TeSys-Lég
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 63 keywords for TeSys-Lég in Google Play
TeSys-Lég tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 42.9.
Cropping systems greengrocers efficient products phytophamaceutiques
Tracked keywords
63
0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: ministry
Avg difficulty
42.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.1
ministry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 264
- 59.8
produced
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 129
- 60.4
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 295
- 64.0
schools
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
- 66.1
impact
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 508
Unranked opportunities
ministry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 264
produced
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 129
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 295
schools
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 138
impact
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 508
High competition keywords
available
Total apps: 199,934 • Major competitors: 9,729
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
manage
Total apps: 186,339 • Major competitors: 6,766
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
allows
Total apps: 177,622 • Major competitors: 5,761
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
support
Total apps: 171,021 • Major competitors: 7,328
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
quality
Total apps: 144,762 • Major competitors: 6,425
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 171,021 competing apps Median installs: 1,243 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,328 major competitor apps |
| organization | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 20,335 competing apps Median installs: 435 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 322 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,708 competing apps Median installs: 1,275 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,672 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,535 competing apps Median installs: 1,619 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,519 major competitor apps |
| manage | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 186,339 competing apps Median installs: 651 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,766 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,806 competing apps Median installs: 1,986 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,606 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 103,575 competing apps Median installs: 2,224 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,286 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,934 competing apps Median installs: 2,017 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| request | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 44,766 competing apps Median installs: 960 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,371 major competitor apps |
| products | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 66,884 competing apps Median installs: 929 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,326 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,815 competing apps Median installs: 598 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,167 major competitor apps |
| financial | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 49,494 competing apps Median installs: 1,123 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,806 major competitor apps |
| market | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 38,383 competing apps Median installs: 1,342 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,360 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,762 competing apps Median installs: 1,645 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,425 major competitor apps |
| practical | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 35,225 competing apps Median installs: 820 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 65,952 competing apps Median installs: 861 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,830 major competitor apps |
| develop | 71 | 100 | 47 | 71 30,003 competing apps Median installs: 2,446 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,652 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,622 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,761 major competitor apps |
| charge | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 19,204 competing apps Median installs: 2,761 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,063 major competitor apps |
| know | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 131,853 competing apps Median installs: 1,722 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,566 major competitor apps |
| producer | 71 | 100 | 34 | 48 1,020 competing apps Median installs: 1,013 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| guide | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 71,718 competing apps Median installs: 1,279 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,015 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,544 competing apps Median installs: 1,567 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,147 major competitor apps |
| agriculture | 72 | 100 | 33 | 54 2,386 competing apps Median installs: 1,205 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 79 major competitor apps |
| training | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,248 competing apps Median installs: 614 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,645 major competitor apps |
App Description
Cropping systems greengrocers efficient products phytophamaceutiques
It allows user to select one or more technical options to sustainably manage a given, but also to know how they are implemented, their effectiveness and their impact bioagressor.
This guide produced by the GIS PIClég applies to all productions field, shelter or greenhouse for the fresh market or for processing. It identifies practical alternatives available and develops a methodology to develop more efficient farming systems protection products and multi-performance in terms of environment, economy, quality of production and organization within the farms.
Conducted at the request of the Ministry in charge of agriculture with the financial support of ONEMA, it is very widely distributed since July, 2014 people in charge of consulting, development and training for vegetable production (chambers of agriculture, producer organizations, agricultural schools ...).