Criollo
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 92 keywords for Criollo in Google Play
Criollo tracks 92 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 92 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 44.1.
Calibrator and verifier of sprayers, Calculator of chemical mixtures.
Tracked keywords
92
0 ranked • 92 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: obtain
Avg difficulty
44.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 549
- 65.9
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,033
- 65.2
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 345
- 63.6
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 530
- 61.4
ground
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 452
Unranked opportunities
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 549
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 1,033
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 345
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 530
ground
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 452
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 337,289 • Major competitors: 11,556
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
mobile
Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
using
Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
share
Total apps: 215,942 • Major competitors: 10,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,207 competing apps Median installs: 2,082 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,885 major competitor apps | |
| share | 66 | 100 | 60 | 85 215,942 competing apps Median installs: 2,262 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,852 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 116,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,490 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,298 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 82,336 competing apps Median installs: 1,975 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,302 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,825 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,673 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,093 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,258 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,451 competing apps Median installs: 2,204 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 549 major competitor apps |
| volume | 74 | 100 | 51 | 66 13,795 competing apps Median installs: 5,015 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,033 major competitor apps |
| operation | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,431 competing apps Median installs: 1,979 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 683 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,113 competing apps Median installs: 3,999 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,364 major competitor apps |
| services | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 103,208 competing apps Median installs: 938 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 3,997 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 337,289 competing apps Median installs: 1,032 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 11,556 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,048 competing apps Median installs: 1,539 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,026 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 19,565 competing apps Median installs: 2,093 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 946 major competitor apps |
| book | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 88,422 competing apps Median installs: 732 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,269 major competitor apps |
| want | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 192,216 competing apps Median installs: 2,835 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,455 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 178,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,251 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,820 major competitor apps |
| color | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 64,334 competing apps Median installs: 2,273 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,080 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 57 | 75 53,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,608 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,618 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 64,956 competing apps Median installs: 2,853 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,079 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 140,631 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,230 major competitor apps |
| made | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 89,160 competing apps Median installs: 1,695 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,595 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,575 competing apps Median installs: 1,228 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
App Description
Calibrator and verifier of sprayers, Calculator of chemical mixtures.
When using the application, it is possible to calculate alternatively the advance speed of the equipment, the working pressure and the spray volume for a peak size and a determined distance between peaks. It is also possible to verify the peaks and obtain a quick diagnosis of their status.
The information generated from the input of the data and the calculations made is compiled in a report that can be saved in PDF format and shared via email and / or WhatsApp. Once installed, the use of Criollo does not require signal availability or access to the network. These services are only necessary if you want to share the generated reports.
This application was developed by INTA, from its Hilario Ascasubi Agricultural Experimental Station, dependent on the Buenos Aires Sur Regional Center. Its authors were Juan Pablo D'Amico and Santiago Crocioni.
For the development of the application CRIOLLO was based on the following sources of information: for the list of peaks with standardized color code was based on the criteria of ISO 10625 (2005) Equipment for crop protection-Sprayer nozzles-Color coding for identification. While for, the calculation equations were taken from the book Agricultural Land Sprays by Agustín Onorato and Omar Tesouro, Ediciones INTA. 2006