Criollo
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 92 keywords for Criollo in Google Play
Criollo tracks 92 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 92 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 47.6.
Calibrator and verifier of sprayers, Calculator of chemical mixtures.
Tracked keywords
92
0 ranked • 92 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: calculate
Avg difficulty
47.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.2
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 742
- 67.7
pdf
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 918
- 67.6
advance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,150
- 68.4
shared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 982
- 68.3
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 830
Unranked opportunities
calculate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 742
pdf
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.8 • Competitors: 918
advance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Competitors: 1,150
shared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Competitors: 982
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 830
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
want
Total apps: 103,224 • Major competitors: 12,476
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
share
Total apps: 102,576 • Major competitors: 11,283
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,918 major competitor apps | |
| share | 66 | 100 | 65 | 86 102,576 competing apps Median installs: 35,820 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 11,283 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 56 | 73 18,347 competing apps Median installs: 30,163 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 6,975 competing apps Median installs: 33,614 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 670 major competitor apps |
| volume | 72 | 100 | 55 | 66 7,437 competing apps Median installs: 46,520 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| operation | 72 | 100 | 47 | 67 8,140 competing apps Median installs: 28,702 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 724 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 60 | 76 28,360 competing apps Median installs: 55,734 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,571 major competitor apps |
| services | 69 | 100 | 64 | 78 38,598 competing apps Median installs: 28,828 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,045 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| code | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 19,267 competing apps Median installs: 32,705 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| format | 72 | 100 | 49 | 67 8,870 competing apps Median installs: 34,823 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 956 major competitor apps |
| book | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 32,371 competing apps Median installs: 24,485 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,333 major competitor apps |
| want | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 103,224 competing apps Median installs: 39,982 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,476 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
| color | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 30,080 competing apps Median installs: 44,962 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,272 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 67 | 75 25,598 competing apps Median installs: 36,807 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,146 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,198 major competitor apps |
| quick | 68 | 100 | 62 | 81 53,200 competing apps Median installs: 33,498 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,079 major competitor apps |
| made | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 42,597 competing apps Median installs: 32,589 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,321 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 9,840 competing apps Median installs: 26,954 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 742 major competitor apps |
App Description
Calibrator and verifier of sprayers, Calculator of chemical mixtures.
When using the application, it is possible to calculate alternatively the advance speed of the equipment, the working pressure and the spray volume for a peak size and a determined distance between peaks. It is also possible to verify the peaks and obtain a quick diagnosis of their status.
The information generated from the input of the data and the calculations made is compiled in a report that can be saved in PDF format and shared via email and / or WhatsApp. Once installed, the use of Criollo does not require signal availability or access to the network. These services are only necessary if you want to share the generated reports.
This application was developed by INTA, from its Hilario Ascasubi Agricultural Experimental Station, dependent on the Buenos Aires Sur Regional Center. Its authors were Juan Pablo D'Amico and Santiago Crocioni.
For the development of the application CRIOLLO was based on the following sources of information: for the list of peaks with standardized color code was based on the criteria of ISO 10625 (2005) Equipment for crop protection-Sprayer nozzles-Color coding for identification. While for, the calculation equations were taken from the book Agricultural Land Sprays by Agustín Onorato and Omar Tesouro, Ediciones INTA. 2006