Microwine Predictor
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 74 keywords for Microwine Predictor in Google Play
Microwine Predictor tracks 74 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 74 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 44.3.
Growth predictor of spoilage yeasts in wine and concentrated grapes juice
Tracked keywords
74
0 ranked • 74 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.7
Top keyword: destination
Avg difficulty
44.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.0
destination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,259
- 67.5
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 753
- 68.5
standard
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,127
- 68.5
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 790
- 67.7
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 954
Unranked opportunities
destination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.4 • Competitors: 1,259
upon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 753
standard
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Competitors: 1,127
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Competitors: 790
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 954
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 173,844 • Major competitors: 23,343
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
allows
Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
become
Total apps: 59,069 • Major competitors: 10,342
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 64 | 100 | 64 | 90 173,844 competing apps Median installs: 46,597 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 23,343 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| destination | 73 | 100 | 57 | 68 9,530 competing apps Median installs: 35,253 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,259 major competitor apps |
| product | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 20,165 competing apps Median installs: 31,040 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,102 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 70 | 70 12,008 competing apps Median installs: 50,538 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,739 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 60 | 81 51,898 competing apps Median installs: 37,300 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,276 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,875 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,128 major competitor apps |
| combination | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 7,537 competing apps Median installs: 45,010 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,101 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 60 | 76 28,360 competing apps Median installs: 55,734 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,571 major competitor apps |
| overseas | 70 | 100 | 35 | 53 1,258 competing apps Median installs: 65,572 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 8,881 competing apps Median installs: 28,496 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 753 major competitor apps |
| develop | 71 | 100 | 50 | 72 15,439 competing apps Median installs: 38,317 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,937 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 16,618 competing apps Median installs: 30,552 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| become | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 59,069 competing apps Median installs: 60,770 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,342 major competitor apps |
| safe | 70 | 100 | 65 | 76 27,975 competing apps Median installs: 36,001 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,609 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 43 | 64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| required | 70 | 100 | 61 | 75 23,390 competing apps Median installs: 41,967 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,770 major competitor apps |
| probability | 70 | 100 | 34 | 52 1,143 competing apps Median installs: 39,660 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 104 major competitor apps |
| two | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 30,958 competing apps Median installs: 35,508 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,566 major competitor apps |
| main | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,327 competing apps Median installs: 33,651 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,349 major competitor apps |
| allow | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 24,482 competing apps Median installs: 34,384 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,623 major competitor apps |
| long | 70 | 100 | 57 | 76 27,835 competing apps Median installs: 36,639 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,307 major competitor apps |
| standard | 73 | 100 | 53 | 69 10,269 competing apps Median installs: 34,526 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,127 major competitor apps |
App Description
Growth predictor of spoilage yeasts in wine and concentrated grapes juice
Wine: Interaction between the three major wine-relevant “barriers”: pH, ethanol and free sulphite determine the growth rate of the yeast and consequently the speed at which the defect will become perceptible. There is a direct relationship between the level of Brettanomyces population and the concentrations of ethyl phenols produced. The application allows the calculation of the free sulphite concentration required to achieve a desired probability of “no- growth” based upon pH and ethanol concentration in the wine.
Concentrated grape juice: The combination of pH and sugar concentration determines the
growth rate at which the main spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii will be able to grow, and also the time to reach a population greater than 10 6 cells/g where the spoilage becomes evident. The application allows to predict what is the pH value that
should be reached in the concentrated grape juice to get a microbiological shelf-life long enough to allow the product to arrive at its destination in safe conditions.
This application was developed by the INTA, from its Mendoza Experimental Agricultural Station, dependent on the Mendoza- San Juan Regional Center.
