Microwine Predictor
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 74 keywords for Microwine Predictor in Google Play
Microwine Predictor tracks 74 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 74 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 41.9.
Growth predictor of spoilage yeasts in wine and concentrated grapes juice
Tracked keywords
74
0 ranked • 74 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: calculation
Avg difficulty
41.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
- 59.8
estimate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 191
- 65.7
determine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 512
- 64.8
interaction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 400
- 63.4
temperature
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 369
Unranked opportunities
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 348
estimate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 191
determine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 512
interaction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 400
temperature
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 369
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,388 • Major competitors: 16,211
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
free
Total apps: 322,124 • Major competitors: 22,311
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
allows
Total apps: 177,725 • Major competitors: 5,777
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
based
Total apps: 152,123 • Major competitors: 5,367
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
life
Total apps: 114,270 • Major competitors: 6,065
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 60 | 88 322,124 competing apps Median installs: 4,281 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 22,311 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 109,646 competing apps Median installs: 1,860 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,427 major competitor apps |
| destination | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 24,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,202 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,224 major competitor apps |
| product | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 52,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,062 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,090 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 59 | 70 24,795 competing apps Median installs: 3,102 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,731 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 114,270 competing apps Median installs: 2,070 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,065 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,388 competing apps Median installs: 1,265 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,211 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,251 competing apps Median installs: 2,150 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,057 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 46 | 67 15,635 competing apps Median installs: 2,407 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,032 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,507 competing apps Median installs: 3,885 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,370 major competitor apps |
| overseas | 72 | 100 | 35 | 53 2,174 competing apps Median installs: 6,488 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,999 competing apps Median installs: 2,388 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 591 major competitor apps |
| develop | 71 | 100 | 47 | 71 30,039 competing apps Median installs: 2,461 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,660 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,725 competing apps Median installs: 1,249 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,777 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 39,960 competing apps Median installs: 952 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,435 major competitor apps |
| become | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 102,842 competing apps Median installs: 4,656 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,751 major competitor apps |
| safe | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 67,497 competing apps Median installs: 1,619 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,597 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,523 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 41,694 competing apps Median installs: 3,188 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,205 major competitor apps |
| probability | 72 | 100 | 34 | 53 2,235 competing apps Median installs: 3,741 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 57,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,869 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,990 major competitor apps |
| main | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 68,488 competing apps Median installs: 2,332 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,232 major competitor apps |
| allow | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 48,171 competing apps Median installs: 2,089 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,165 major competitor apps |
| long | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 64,838 competing apps Median installs: 2,083 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,514 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 48 | 69 22,206 competing apps Median installs: 2,203 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,162 major competitor apps |
App Description
Growth predictor of spoilage yeasts in wine and concentrated grapes juice
Wine: Interaction between the three major wine-relevant “barriers”: pH, ethanol and free sulphite determine the growth rate of the yeast and consequently the speed at which the defect will become perceptible. There is a direct relationship between the level of Brettanomyces population and the concentrations of ethyl phenols produced. The application allows the calculation of the free sulphite concentration required to achieve a desired probability of “no- growth” based upon pH and ethanol concentration in the wine.
Concentrated grape juice: The combination of pH and sugar concentration determines the
growth rate at which the main spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii will be able to grow, and also the time to reach a population greater than 10 6 cells/g where the spoilage becomes evident. The application allows to predict what is the pH value that
should be reached in the concentrated grape juice to get a microbiological shelf-life long enough to allow the product to arrive at its destination in safe conditions.
This application was developed by the INTA, from its Mendoza Experimental Agricultural Station, dependent on the Mendoza- San Juan Regional Center.
