Compare Inspired Version, KJV
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 102 keywords for Compare Inspired Version, KJV in Google Play
Compare Inspired Version, KJV tracks 102 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 101 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.1, difficulty 42.6, best rank 8.
Comparison of Joseph Smith's IV with the KJV and a Greek/Hebrew interlinear.
Tracked keywords
102
1 ranked • 101 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 8 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: chapter
Avg difficulty
42.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.9
chapter
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
- 66.2
meaning
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 444
- 64.9
king
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,174
- 60.2
context
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 193
- 62.4
sometimes
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 503
Unranked opportunities
chapter
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 381
meaning
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 444
king
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Competitors: 1,174
context
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 193
sometimes
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 503
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 367,061 • Major competitors: 23,500
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
using
Total apps: 220,824 • Major competitors: 12,059
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
available
Total apps: 201,883 • Major competitors: 10,535
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
allows
Total apps: 176,993 • Major competitors: 6,455
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
many
Total apps: 164,854 • Major competitors: 11,670
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compare | 72 | 100 | 46 | 69 20,923 competing apps Median installs: 2,704 Avg rating: 4.1 | 11 | 8 | 1,267 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 59 | 89 367,061 competing apps Median installs: 3,177 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 23,500 major competitor apps |
| word | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,550 competing apps Median installs: 3,963 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 2,355 major competitor apps |
| change | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 91,182 competing apps Median installs: 4,808 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,406 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 57,194 competing apps Median installs: 4,924 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,391 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 142,884 competing apps Median installs: 564 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,324 major competitor apps |
| words | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,392 competing apps Median installs: 4,884 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,972 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,656 competing apps Median installs: 3,163 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,072 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 220,824 competing apps Median installs: 2,910 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 12,059 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 201,883 competing apps Median installs: 2,603 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 10,535 major competitor apps |
| excellent | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 21,096 competing apps Median installs: 3,372 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,196 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 41,413 competing apps Median installs: 4,600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,592 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 139,277 competing apps Median installs: 3,304 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,668 major competitor apps |
| task | 72 | 100 | 50 | 69 22,691 competing apps Median installs: 1,404 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,200 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 52,156 competing apps Median installs: 4,107 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,011 major competitor apps |
| continuous | 73 | 100 | 43 | 69 20,546 competing apps Median installs: 1,474 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 728 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 115,722 competing apps Median installs: 1,473 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,130 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 47,152 competing apps Median installs: 4,018 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,017 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 78,333 competing apps Median installs: 4,522 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,694 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 164,854 competing apps Median installs: 5,384 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 11,670 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 102,614 competing apps Median installs: 1,350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,132 major competitor apps |
| book | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 89,381 competing apps Median installs: 902 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,441 major competitor apps |
| benefit | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,258 competing apps Median installs: 2,047 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 809 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 176,993 competing apps Median installs: 1,474 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,455 major competitor apps |
| books | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 23,031 competing apps Median installs: 4,782 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 790 major competitor apps |
App Description
Comparison of Joseph Smith's IV with the KJV and a Greek/Hebrew interlinear.
This scholarly work is to benefit the reader in four ways.
1. The majority of Bible reference books are geared to the King James Version of the Bible. Concordances, Bible dictionaries, and commentaries all use numbering systems (chapter and verse) which is also the same used by the King James Version. Joseph Smith’s Inspired Version has its own numbering system, making it very difficult to use many of the references available. With this parallel study, a verse directed to the numbering system of the King James Version could quickly be cross referenced in the Inspired Version and read in the context of other verses.
2. It is a tedious task to compare the differences between the Inspired Version and the King James Version. This reference highlights the change in words using bold and underlining to show words that appear in one version but do not appear in the other version.
3. The Berean Interlinear Bible is an additional tool to allow the non-Greek reader to check out the meaning of Greek words used for various Bible translations today. Each Greek word is followed by an English translation. The English is hyperlinked to a more detailed explanation of the Greek word. For those not knowing Greek, one could also copy the Greek word and have the Internet interpret the word. The same applies to the Hebrew interlinear.
4. This reference has the advantage of being able to read any of the versions (IV, KJV, and Greek/Hebrew) in the order available in any hard copy. Previously, there was one excellent reference book (Joseph Smith’s “New Translation” of the Bible) showing only the verses with differences between the King James Version and the Inspired Version. The verses that did not have differences were not printed, making reading a continuous narrative difficult. Also, sometimes the passages of Joseph Smith’s work were reorganized from what is found in the King James Version. The text of a chapter might have verses 5 and 8 switched with the order found in the other version.