KGateway
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 32 keywords for KGateway in Google Play
KGateway tracks 32 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 32 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.6, difficulty 48.1.
KGateway provision tools
Tracked keywords
32
0 ranked • 32 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: configure
Avg difficulty
48.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.6
configure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 364
- 65.0
server
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 769
- 59.6
launched
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 209
- 60.0
configuration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 258
- 67.3
internal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 559
Unranked opportunities
configure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 364
server
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 769
launched
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 209
configuration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 258
internal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 559
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
connect
Total apps: 129,467 • Major competitors: 4,596
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
used
Total apps: 116,194 • Major competitors: 4,649
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
device
Total apps: 107,978 • Major competitors: 6,164
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| security | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 52,577 competing apps Median installs: 1,699 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,747 major competitor apps |
| internal | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 16,816 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 107,978 competing apps Median installs: 2,602 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,164 major competitor apps |
| connected | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 74,127 competing apps Median installs: 549 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,177 major competitor apps |
| scan | 71 | 100 | 56 | 72 34,427 competing apps Median installs: 1,812 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,193 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 63,825 competing apps Median installs: 2,077 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,975 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| connect | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 129,467 competing apps Median installs: 867 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,596 major competitor apps |
| provision | 72 | 100 | 33 | 54 2,305 competing apps Median installs: 2,217 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 68,300 competing apps Median installs: 1,230 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,128 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,165 competing apps Median installs: 2,826 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,083 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,261 competing apps Median installs: 3,227 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,994 major competitor apps |
| perform | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 26,262 competing apps Median installs: 3,039 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,699 major competitor apps |
| resources | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 35,018 competing apps Median installs: 801 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 987 major competitor apps |
| configure | 74 | 100 | 48 | 63 8,525 competing apps Median installs: 1,780 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 364 major competitor apps |
| router | 72 | 100 | 34 | 51 1,689 competing apps Median installs: 1,647 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| first | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 105,932 competing apps Median installs: 2,460 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,952 major competitor apps |
| gateway | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 14,641 competing apps Median installs: 668 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 370 major competitor apps |
| server | 74 | 100 | 44 | 65 12,133 competing apps Median installs: 4,334 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 769 major competitor apps |
| supports | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 58,428 competing apps Median installs: 1,958 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,008 major competitor apps |
| launched | 74 | 100 | 39 | 60 5,506 competing apps Median installs: 2,868 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 209 major competitor apps |
| risk | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 15,363 competing apps Median installs: 1,544 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| protocol | 72 | 100 | 37 | 55 2,722 competing apps Median installs: 2,086 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 112 major competitor apps |
App Description
KGateway provision tools
1. Wi-Fi connection information.
2. BLE scan parameters, filter parameters.
3. HTTP or MQTT server information connected by the gateway.
Why does this app use the HTTP configuration protocol?
Because BLE/Wi-Fi gateway's internal resources are limited, the device only supports the HTTP protocol. This app uses HTTP to connect to the gatway device for provision. In addition, because the app will only perform provisioning when the KGateway is used for the first time, and the app and the device must be under the same Wi-Fi router during provisioning, the security risk of using the HTTP protocol for Provisioning is controllable.