BoilerFE

Developer: kaupshenoyassociates

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

160 installs

Ratings not yet available

7.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 103 keywords for BoilerFE in Google Play

Developer: kaupshenoyassociates Category: tools Rating: 1.6

BoilerFE tracks 103 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 103 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 43.7.

BoilerFE analyzes efficiency and performance of water tube industrial boilers.

Tracked keywords

103

0 ranked • 103 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: screens

Avg difficulty

43.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

screens

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 291
60.8
grade

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 572
65.8
unit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 367
64.4
gas

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 583
62.0
thus

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 216
64.0

Unranked opportunities

screens

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 291
grade

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 572
unit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 367
gas

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 583
thus

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 216

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 280,962 • Major competitors: 14,384

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
using

Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
create

Total apps: 200,665 • Major competitors: 13,287

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
choose

Total apps: 196,321 • Major competitors: 12,236

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
different

Total apps: 187,171 • Major competitors: 13,720

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
feed	73	100	52	67 15,903 competing apps Median installs: 868 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	895 major competitor apps
version	70	100	56	76 56,833 competing apps Median installs: 3,752 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,125 major competitor apps
sheet	73	100	37	57 3,937 competing apps Median installs: 2,504 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	144 major competitor apps
users	67	100	54	82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,877 major competitor apps
conveniently	72	100	43	70 23,386 competing apps Median installs: 699 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	694 major competitor apps
used	68	100	56	81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,709 major competitor apps
save	67	100	59	83 156,061 competing apps Median installs: 2,758 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	9,506 major competitor apps
file	72	100	60	71 28,900 competing apps Median installs: 4,450 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,184 major competitor apps
valuable	71	100	45	72 31,015 competing apps Median installs: 1,354 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,051 major competitor apps
choose	66	100	57	84 196,321 competing apps Median installs: 2,313 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	12,236 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	11,093 major competitor apps
help	65	100	60	87 280,962 competing apps Median installs: 1,692 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	14,384 major competitor apps
efficiency	73	100	41	67 16,430 competing apps Median installs: 381 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	314 major competitor apps
audit	72	100	32	53 2,114 competing apps Median installs: 446 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	28 major competitor apps
run	70	100	52	74 44,311 competing apps Median installs: 3,270 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	3,288 major competitor apps
create	66	100	62	84 200,665 competing apps Median installs: 2,550 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	13,287 major competitor apps
many	67	100	57	83 165,971 competing apps Median installs: 4,240 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	10,598 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	55	83 166,176 competing apps Median installs: 1,227 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	5,004 major competitor apps
tool	68	100	51	80 101,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,136 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,601 major competitor apps
tube	72	100	36	52 1,780 competing apps Median installs: 4,874 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	155 major competitor apps
type	70	100	53	75 49,269 competing apps Median installs: 3,115 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,620 major competitor apps
screens	74	100	45	61 6,541 competing apps Median installs: 3,185 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	291 major competitor apps
performance	69	100	48	77 65,394 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 1.6	—	—	1,826 major competitor apps
become	68	100	56	80 103,133 competing apps Median installs: 4,669 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	8,811 major competitor apps
grade	74	100	51	66 13,422 competing apps Median installs: 2,401 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	572 major competitor apps

App Description

BoilerFE analyzes efficiency and performance of water tube industrial boilers.

BoilerFE can help run a quick preliminary audit on water tube industrial boilers. Users can select to run different types of fuels such as coal, oil and gases with specific compositions and heating values. The combustion model computes the efficiency and displays the heat balance sheet as well as flue gas analysis and stoichiometry of the combustion process. In this version users can create and save as many boiler application data and save it in a file with unique titles for monitoring and review. Thus it would also help in performance analysis of different grade fuels used for the same application and become a valuable tool for all energy engineers and auditors in assessing the potential savings as well as to identify areas for improvement.

Fuels:
Coal, Natural gas, Methane, Ethane, Propane, Butane, Furnace Oil#1, Furnace Oil#2, Furnace Oil#3, Furnace Oil#4, Furnace Oil#5, Furnace Oil#6, Diesel (HSD), Kerosene, LSHS, LPG.

By default, App uses a generic Coal fired in an industrial boiler that can be edited for more specific type and compositions. The screen shots displays this example with results on heat balance sheet, exhaust gas analysis and stoichiometry. A brief description of the computation model used in this app is also provided in App notes for reference.

Boiler Specification and inputs:
Users can conveniently choose either SI or USCS unit standards for data input. The home screen covers the main boiler specification data and separate screens are provided to edit other Input such as airflow, type of fuel and feed rates as shown in the screen shots.

Result:
Besides computation of boiler efficiency using direct method, app provides the following results as shown in the screen shots.
1.Heat balance sheet
2.Flue gas analysis
3.Stoichiometry