Compressor Capacity
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 130 keywords for Compressor Capacity in Google Play
Compressor Capacity tracks 130 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 130 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 43.9.
App can monitor capacity performance and helps in running FAD & leakage testing.
Tracked keywords
130
0 ranked • 130 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: summary
Avg difficulty
43.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 259
- 61.1
motor
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 616
- 64.7
minimum
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 792
- 65.7
stage
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 794
- 63.6
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 530
Unranked opportunities
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 259
motor
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 616
minimum
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 792
stage
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 794
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 530
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
world
Total apps: 194,449 • Major competitors: 13,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.2
different
Total apps: 187,171 • Major competitors: 13,720
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 90,292 competing apps Median installs: 3,556 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,880 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 74,510 competing apps Median installs: 1,868 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,971 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 141,210 competing apps Median installs: 494 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,042 major competitor apps |
| sheet | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,937 competing apps Median installs: 2,504 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,167 competing apps Median installs: 1,297 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,151 major competitor apps |
| wear | 71 | 100 | 63 | 72 32,469 competing apps Median installs: 363 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 813 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,211 competing apps Median installs: 2,014 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,589 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 385,850 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 16,372 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 118,372 competing apps Median installs: 1,169 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,344 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,430 competing apps Median installs: 381 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| operation | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,431 competing apps Median installs: 1,979 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 683 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 63,818 competing apps Median installs: 523 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,633 major competitor apps |
| tests | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,961 competing apps Median installs: 1,590 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 88,754 competing apps Median installs: 2,928 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,778 major competitor apps |
| motor | 74 | 100 | 44 | 61 6,858 competing apps Median installs: 5,009 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 616 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,148 competing apps Median installs: 2,001 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,794 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 44,311 competing apps Median installs: 3,270 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,288 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 74 | 100 | 45 | 65 11,540 competing apps Median installs: 4,420 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 84,168 competing apps Median installs: 685 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,970 major competitor apps |
| stage | 74 | 100 | 44 | 66 13,298 competing apps Median installs: 2,404 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 794 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,136 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,601 major competitor apps |
| bring | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,983 competing apps Median installs: 2,078 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,815 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 17,051 competing apps Median installs: 2,389 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 65,394 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,826 major competitor apps |
App Description
App can monitor capacity performance and helps in running FAD & leakage testing.
Manufacturers give compressor specification data such as FAD, power and other efficiencies at certain standard operating conditions. But, most compressors normally operate between two set pressure points for loading and unloading. Therefore app uses a hypothetical pressure ratio of average discharge pressure to ambient to compute different performance indices. Further, any change in operating conditions such as atmospheric pressure due to altitude, temperature, humidity etc. could also have considerable impact on compressor performance. A typical example is shown in screen shot. Thus app can be a helpful tool for different operation and maintenance personnel to evaluate compressor performance time to time.
Ambient Properties:
Ambient properties such as atmospheric pressure, temperature and humidity values are taken as key input to the computation model. The app computes the pressure for any given altitude. Data for some of the higher altitude (> 1000m) cities around the world are also provided for convenience.
Compressor Specification Data:
A typical compressor specification data sheet is show in the screen shot. FAD, pressure rating and motor hp and rpm data are the minimum requirement based on manufacturers data sheet. Additional data pertaining to reciprocating cylinder data helps to determine the range for FAD for general verification. Volumetric efficiency is primarily depended upon cylinder clearance and generally present in most compressors and in the range of 2% to 8% of total swept volume.
FAD/Leakage Testing
As the compressor put more hours on service, the natural wear and tear could bring down the performance of any compressor. Therefore, it is often necessary to run tests to determine its capacity and also any excess leakage in the compressed air system. This app helps to run quick tests to estimate the losses and concern for any further investigation.
Result Summary:
A comprehensive result summary provided that includes heat load for the inter coolers, moisture content etc. as shown in screen shot. Additional information