EnergyCycles

Developer: kaupshenoyassociates

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

12 installs

Ratings not yet available

MAU not available

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 99 keywords for EnergyCycles in Google Play

Developer: kaupshenoyassociates Category: tools Rating: 0.01

EnergyCycles tracks 99 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 99 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 44.9.

Covers four major energy cycle apps to help run onsite analysis and audit.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 99 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.2

Top keyword: output

Avg difficulty

44.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

output

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 256
59.8
cycle

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 296
60.8
gas

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 583
62.0
outdoor

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 415
62.3
utility

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 474
63.2

Unranked opportunities

output

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 256
cycle

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 296
gas

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 583
outdoor

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 415
utility

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 474

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 280,962 • Major competitors: 14,384

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
using

Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
data

Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
user

Total apps: 143,402 • Major competitors: 5,128

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
users

Total apps: 136,474 • Major competitors: 4,877

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
feed	73	100	52	67 15,903 competing apps Median installs: 868 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	895 major competitor apps
change	68	100	53	79 90,292 competing apps Median installs: 3,556 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,880 major competitor apps
users	67	100	54	82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,877 major competitor apps
tailored	70	100	48	75 48,397 competing apps Median installs: 602 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,604 major competitor apps
section	71	100	47	72 32,580 competing apps Median installs: 1,051 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,050 major competitor apps
individual	71	100	49	73 38,004 competing apps Median installs: 1,268 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	1,070 major competitor apps
file	72	100	60	71 28,900 competing apps Median installs: 4,450 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,184 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	11,093 major competitor apps
added	71	100	53	74 41,785 competing apps Median installs: 3,572 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,369 major competitor apps
help	65	100	60	87 280,962 competing apps Median installs: 1,692 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	14,384 major competitor apps
efficiency	73	100	41	67 16,430 competing apps Median installs: 381 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	314 major competitor apps
monitor	69	100	47	77 63,818 competing apps Median installs: 523 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,633 major competitor apps
continuous	73	100	43	69 20,069 competing apps Median installs: 1,225 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	657 major competitor apps
power	69	100	54	77 67,148 competing apps Median installs: 2,001 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,794 major competitor apps
run	70	100	52	74 44,311 competing apps Median installs: 3,270 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	3,288 major competitor apps
tool	68	100	51	80 101,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,136 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,601 major competitor apps
part	69	100	54	77 67,803 competing apps Median installs: 1,506 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	2,920 major competitor apps
please	67	100	54	81 128,746 competing apps Median installs: 3,790 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	6,306 major competitor apps
output	74	100	38	60 5,711 competing apps Median installs: 2,807 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	256 major competitor apps
following	69	100	54	77 64,956 competing apps Median installs: 2,853 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,079 major competitor apps
user	67	100	56	82 143,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	5,128 major competitor apps
web	71	100	54	74 41,638 competing apps Median installs: 1,221 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,679 major competitor apps
displayed	72	100	46	69 21,272 competing apps Median installs: 1,884 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	738 major competitor apps
two	70	100	50	76 58,077 competing apps Median installs: 2,863 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,008 major competitor apps
screen	68	100	62	80 99,720 competing apps Median installs: 3,469 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,976 major competitor apps

App Description

Covers four major energy cycle apps to help run onsite analysis and audit.

Energy Cycle App covers four major energy conversion cycles to facilitate as a tool for performing energy efficiency studies. This also can be very helpful to energy engineers and auditors in assessing the cycle performances with respect to sizing and conversion efficiencies. App generates following generic models two under utility power generation category and two under HVAC category as shown in the screen shots. Each can be tailored to suits individual application and can be saved in a file for continuous reference and to monitor the change and improvement.

Energy Cycles:
1. Rankine Cycle
a. Boiler
b. Turbine
c. Condenser
d. Feed Pump

2. CHP (Brayton) Cycle
a. Air compressor
b. Fuel Injection
c. Gas Turbine
d. Steam Generator

3. HVAC Cooling Cycle
a. Conditioned space
b. Outdoor Air
c. Fan-coil process
d. Return and Exhaust air flows

4. HVAC Heating Cycle
a. Conditioned space
b. Outdoor Air
c. Fan-coil process
d. Return and Exhaust air flows

Cycle efficiency and total cycle heat is displayed in the home screen along with state properties. For HVAC, a separate section is added as a part of conditioned space for editing cooling and heating load under 10 major categories as shown in the screen shot. A separate edit section is provided for the users to select and compute load under each category using recommended parameters. Each user specific cycles can be saved for future review and analysis. Details on app specific user input and output are explained in the respective help notes sections.

For more examples and data please refer to our web site at www.flowjoule.com