FanSpec

Developer: kaupshenoyassociates

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

98 installs

Ratings not yet available

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 83 keywords for FanSpec in Google Play

Developer: kaupshenoyassociates Category: tools

FanSpec tracks 83 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 83 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 44.2.

App evaluates selection of axial and centrifugal fans for a given application.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 83 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.3

Top keyword: summary

Avg difficulty

44.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

summary

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 259
63.7
motor

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 616
61.1
flow

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 483
65.7
medium

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 241
60.8
length

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 335
61.3

Unranked opportunities

summary

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 259
motor

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 616
flow

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 483
medium

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 241
length

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 335

High competition keywords

choose

Total apps: 196,321 • Major competitors: 12,236

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
different

Total apps: 187,171 • Major competitors: 13,720

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
data

Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
right

Total apps: 158,613 • Major competitors: 8,097

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.4
based

Total apps: 152,689 • Major competitors: 5,418

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
action	71	100	58	73 38,468 competing apps Median installs: 5,314 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,544 major competitor apps
right	67	100	58	83 158,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,615 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	8,097 major competitor apps
used	68	100	56	81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,709 major competitor apps
choose	66	100	57	84 196,321 competing apps Median installs: 2,313 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	12,236 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	52	82 137,173 competing apps Median installs: 1,374 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,451 major competitor apps
rate	70	100	48	75 50,100 competing apps Median installs: 2,182 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,057 major competitor apps
motor	74	100	44	61 6,858 competing apps Median installs: 5,009 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	616 major competitor apps
power	69	100	54	77 67,148 competing apps Median installs: 2,001 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,794 major competitor apps
comprehensive	69	100	48	78 84,168 competing apps Median installs: 685 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	1,970 major competitor apps
flow	74	100	42	66 13,236 competing apps Median installs: 1,163 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	483 major competitor apps
type	70	100	53	75 49,269 competing apps Median installs: 3,115 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,620 major competitor apps
upon	73	100	42	67 17,051 competing apps Median installs: 2,389 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	596 major competitor apps
performance	69	100	48	77 65,394 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 1.6	—	—	1,826 major competitor apps
terminal	73	100	37	58 4,180 competing apps Median installs: 3,319 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	206 major competitor apps
fan	72	100	48	70 23,847 competing apps Median installs: 7,220 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,654 major competitor apps
medium	74	100	38	61 6,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,676 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	241 major competitor apps
length	74	100	39	61 6,998 competing apps Median installs: 2,377 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	335 major competitor apps
includes	69	100	50	77 66,636 competing apps Median installs: 2,094 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,571 major competitor apps
pressure	74	100	43	64 9,844 competing apps Median installs: 1,835 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	530 major competitor apps
auto	72	100	56	71 27,388 competing apps Median installs: 6,405 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	2,426 major competitor apps
displayed	72	100	46	69 21,272 competing apps Median installs: 1,884 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	738 major competitor apps
screen	68	100	62	80 99,720 competing apps Median installs: 3,469 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,976 major competitor apps
different	66	100	58	84 187,171 competing apps Median installs: 4,067 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	13,720 major competitor apps
provided	70	100	47	74 46,432 competing apps Median installs: 2,025 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,477 major competitor apps
data	67	100	58	84 180,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,181 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	6,588 major competitor apps

App Description

App evaluates selection of axial and centrifugal fans for a given application.

App helps in evaluation of different fan specifications for a given application. Most manufacturers provide fan curve (Q vs H) and the operating point on this curve depends on the type of duct system, the average duct velocity, duct pressure loss and duct leakage rates. Thus selecting a right fan for the given duct system is very critical to the satisfactory performance and energy efficiency.

Fan properties:
Fans are categorized based on the type of flow. The flow can be either axial or radial by centrifugal action based on type of application. Fan specification data such as rotor diameter, fan rpm, motor power and flow rate at given static pressure need to be provided that will be evaluated against the given duct system.

Gas properties:
By default Air is used as gas medium and its properties are updated based on the input temperature. For gases other than air, edit the property data such as density, viscosity at given temperature.

Duct system
Users can choose any duct system based on cross section, class, size and material. Upon selection, app auto updates the duct leakage rates as per recommended standards. The total equivalent length data is used for evaluation of duct losses that includes resistance due to different duct fittings and terminal boxes.

Performance summary:
A comprehensive fan-duct system summary is displayed as shown in the screen shot.

App notes provide descriptions of different fan performance characteristics referred in the summary.