Fluid DeltaP
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 98 keywords for Fluid DeltaP in Google Play
Fluid DeltaP tracks 98 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 98 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.4, difficulty 43.5.
App computes fluid pressure drop in pipes and conduits.
Tracked keywords
98
0 ranked • 98 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.4
Top keyword: flow
Avg difficulty
43.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.7
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 483
- 64.4
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 367
- 61.3
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 335
- 63.6
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 530
- 60.4
algorithm
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 311
Unranked opportunities
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 483
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 367
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 335
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 530
algorithm
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 311
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
different
Total apps: 187,171 • Major competitors: 13,720
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
provides
Total apps: 166,176 • Major competitors: 5,004
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
based
Total apps: 152,689 • Major competitors: 5,418
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 103,085 competing apps Median installs: 1,287 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,729 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 82,336 competing apps Median installs: 1,975 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,302 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,093 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,128 competing apps Median installs: 3,006 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,823 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 166,176 competing apps Median installs: 1,227 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,004 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,136 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,601 major competitor apps |
| good | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 81,826 competing apps Median installs: 3,661 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,358 major competitor apps |
| flow | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,236 competing apps Median installs: 1,163 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 483 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 121,472 competing apps Median installs: 1,575 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,894 major competitor apps |
| guide | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 71,403 competing apps Median installs: 1,308 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,011 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 140,631 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,230 major competitor apps |
| unit | 74 | 100 | 43 | 64 10,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 367 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 53,299 competing apps Median installs: 2,975 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,424 major competitor apps |
| length | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 6,998 competing apps Median installs: 2,377 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 335 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 74 | 100 | 43 | 64 9,844 competing apps Median installs: 1,835 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 530 major competitor apps |
| schedules | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 15,050 competing apps Median installs: 486 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 292 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 15,870 competing apps Median installs: 1,343 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 609 major competitor apps |
| weight | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,329 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| screen | 68 | 100 | 62 | 80 99,720 competing apps Median installs: 3,469 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,976 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 187,171 competing apps Median installs: 4,067 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 13,720 major competitor apps |
| provided | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 46,432 competing apps Median installs: 2,025 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,477 major competitor apps |
| transmission | 73 | 100 | 40 | 59 4,888 competing apps Median installs: 1,286 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 180,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,181 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,588 major competitor apps |
| energy | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 25,376 competing apps Median installs: 1,001 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 801 major competitor apps |
App Description
App computes fluid pressure drop in pipes and conduits.
Pressure loss is computed using Darcy’s equation, which gives a good estimate for both liquid and gases. For gases, the method is valid if the fluid velocity is within 40% of its sonic velocity. In addition, app also provides values of different flow parameters that are very useful in comparing results using other methods.
List of fluids:
Air, Steam, Water, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Hydrogen, Helium, CO2, Methane, Ethane, Chlorine, Ammonia, Argon, Hydraulic oil, HFC (R410A), Mercury.
Pipe Schedules:
10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160.
Users can pick applicable sizes under nominal diameter for which app provides the corresponding inside and outside diameter.
Material of construction:
Steel, SS, GI, CI, Concrete, Copper, Aluminum, PVC, Glass, Wood, FRP, Rubber line.
Based on the size, length and material of construction, the app gives the total weight of the pipe for trade-off analysis.
Flow Parameters:
Fluid velocity, Reynolds number and pipe friction coefficient are computed as a function of pipe size, fluid density and viscosity. App has its own algorithm to compute the coefficient of pipe friction based on roughness factor and Reynolds number under turbulent conditions and for laminar it is purely a function of Reynolds number and irrespective of pipe roughness. For more accuracy users can edit the pipe roughness factor. For gases, additional data on sonic velocity is provided for a quick reference. This would also helps in determining pressure loss using other user’s methods.
App notes enlists steps and guide lines for using this app.
Unit of Measurement:
Users can toggle between unit standards (SI or USCS) and work with both standards as shown in the screen shot example.
