LaserSoft Pole Audit O-Calc
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 31 keywords for LaserSoft Pole Audit O-Calc in Google Play
LaserSoft Pole Audit O-Calc tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 43.9.
Pole Audit data collection using lasers, written exclusively for O-Calc® users
Tracked keywords
31
0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: electric
Avg difficulty
43.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
electric
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 483
- 65.7
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 612
- 63.1
utility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 498
- 60.6
measurements
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 158
- 60.0
configuration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 278
Unranked opportunities
electric
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 483
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 612
utility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 498
measurements
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 158
configuration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.2 • Competitors: 278
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 263,588 • Major competitors: 8,518
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
using
Total apps: 223,871 • Major competitors: 12,270
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
data
Total apps: 178,035 • Major competitors: 7,100
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
users
Total apps: 137,206 • Major competitors: 5,485
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
directly
Total apps: 129,291 • Major competitors: 4,498
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| export | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 17,785 competing apps Median installs: 2,259 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,206 competing apps Median installs: 1,355 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,485 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 98,780 competing apps Median installs: 3,835 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,565 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 263,588 competing apps Median installs: 790 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,518 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 223,871 competing apps Median installs: 2,829 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,270 major competitor apps |
| program | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 42,998 competing apps Median installs: 1,826 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,325 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 129,291 competing apps Median installs: 972 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,498 major competitor apps |
| audit | 72 | 100 | 32 | 53 2,089 competing apps Median installs: 517 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| pro | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 33,309 competing apps Median installs: 3,825 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,693 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 94,721 competing apps Median installs: 4,340 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,231 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,704 competing apps Median installs: 440 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 406 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,288 competing apps Median installs: 865 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 607 major competitor apps |
| field data | 69 | 100 | 25 | 41 357 competing apps Median installs: 666 Avg rating: 1.5 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 57 | 84 178,035 competing apps Median installs: 1,333 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,100 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 27,862 competing apps Median installs: 1,172 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| data collection | 73 | 100 | 43 | 55 2,923 competing apps Median installs: 375 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| electric | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 9,207 competing apps Median installs: 2,825 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 483 major competitor apps |
| measure | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,304 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 612 major competitor apps |
| utility | 74 | 100 | 42 | 63 9,104 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 498 major competitor apps |
| exclusively | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 17,205 competing apps Median installs: 699 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 443 major competitor apps |
| records | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 19,231 competing apps Median installs: 902 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 580 major competitor apps |
| laser | 72 | 100 | 40 | 54 2,595 competing apps Median installs: 3,075 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| analysis | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,898 competing apps Median installs: 1,327 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| measurements | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 6,322 competing apps Median installs: 435 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| configuration | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 5,786 competing apps Median installs: 2,509 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 278 major competitor apps |
App Description
Pole Audit data collection using lasers, written exclusively for O-Calc® users