LaserSoft Pole Audit O-Calc
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 31 keywords for LaserSoft Pole Audit O-Calc in Google Play
LaserSoft Pole Audit O-Calc tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 47.6.
Pole Audit data collection using lasers, written exclusively for O-Calc® users
Tracked keywords
31
0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: specifically
Avg difficulty
47.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.6
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 651
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 68.6
written
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 478
- 66.5
export
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 978
Unranked opportunities
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 651
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
written
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 478
export
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.4 • Competitors: 978
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
users
Total apps: 59,104 • Major competitors: 6,026
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
directly
Total apps: 50,750 • Major competitors: 5,021
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| export | 72 | 100 | 50 | 66 7,777 competing apps Median installs: 42,039 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 978 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 49,948 competing apps Median installs: 28,272 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,345 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| program | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 19,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,294 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,273 major competitor apps |
| directly | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 50,750 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,021 major competitor apps |
| audit | 69 | 100 | 30 | 48 604 competing apps Median installs: 17,652 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| pro | 71 | 100 | 64 | 72 16,544 competing apps Median installs: 52,159 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,522 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,748 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 67 8,269 competing apps Median installs: 17,969 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 466 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 73 | 100 | 46 | 69 10,294 competing apps Median installs: 22,066 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 651 major competitor apps |
| field data | 66 | 100 | 21 | 34 91 competing apps Median installs: 13,074 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| field | 73 | 100 | 45 | 69 10,538 competing apps Median installs: 19,519 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 677 major competitor apps |
| data collection | 69 | 100 | 68 | 49 747 competing apps Median installs: 12,329 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| electric | 72 | 100 | 44 | 62 4,395 competing apps Median installs: 29,948 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 455 major competitor apps |
| measure | 72 | 100 | 45 | 64 5,421 competing apps Median installs: 32,524 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 578 major competitor apps |
| utility | 71 | 100 | 47 | 60 3,389 competing apps Median installs: 39,269 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 440 major competitor apps |
| exclusively | 72 | 100 | 43 | 65 6,087 competing apps Median installs: 23,705 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 514 major competitor apps |
| records | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,385 competing apps Median installs: 26,103 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 628 major competitor apps |
| laser | 70 | 100 | 46 | 53 1,237 competing apps Median installs: 64,472 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 238 major competitor apps |
| analysis | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 9,609 competing apps Median installs: 26,199 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 737 major competitor apps |
| measurements | 70 | 100 | 36 | 56 1,951 competing apps Median installs: 22,997 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| configuration | 71 | 100 | 40 | 59 2,692 competing apps Median installs: 25,572 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 265 major competitor apps |
App Description
Pole Audit data collection using lasers, written exclusively for O-Calc® users