Antkey Mobile
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 130 keywords for Antkey Mobile in Google Play
Antkey Mobile tracks 130 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 130 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 42.4.
an identification key for introduced ants
Tracked keywords
130
0 ranked • 130 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: fire
Avg difficulty
42.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
fire
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,300
- 66.1
links
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 463
- 60.4
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 295
- 62.6
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 216
- 65.0
outside
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 679
Unranked opportunities
fire
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.9 • Competitors: 1,300
links
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 463
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 295
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 216
outside
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Competitors: 679
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 368,391 • Major competitors: 21,386
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
find
Total apps: 307,226 • Major competitors: 16,297
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
designed
Total apps: 260,603 • Major competitors: 7,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
best
Total apps: 255,681 • Major competitors: 16,876
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
complete
Total apps: 169,259 • Major competitors: 8,813
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 255,681 competing apps Median installs: 3,149 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,876 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 368,391 competing apps Median installs: 2,544 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 21,386 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 31,066 competing apps Median installs: 1,579 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,136 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,768 competing apps Median installs: 1,174 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 847 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,735 competing apps Median installs: 1,914 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,599 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,056 competing apps Median installs: 2,382 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,638 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,603 competing apps Median installs: 720 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,531 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 307,226 competing apps Median installs: 2,265 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,297 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 47,412 competing apps Median installs: 2,256 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,352 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,493 competing apps Median installs: 1,107 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,392 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,371 competing apps Median installs: 2,104 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,930 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 53,468 competing apps Median installs: 1,843 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,827 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,903 competing apps Median installs: 2,141 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,765 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 57,622 competing apps Median installs: 1,658 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,717 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 85,106 competing apps Median installs: 514 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,549 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 169,259 competing apps Median installs: 2,113 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,813 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,571 competing apps Median installs: 1,111 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,590 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,497 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,895 major competitor apps |
| become | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 102,709 competing apps Median installs: 4,641 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,722 major competitor apps |
| internet | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 122,268 competing apps Median installs: 3,190 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,544 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 54 | 81 128,204 competing apps Median installs: 3,775 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 6,220 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 64 | 78 83,454 competing apps Median installs: 1,627 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,183 major competitor apps |
| hundreds | 72 | 100 | 51 | 71 28,178 competing apps Median installs: 4,655 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,213 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 129,461 competing apps Median installs: 2,532 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,717 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 57,868 competing apps Median installs: 2,864 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,981 major competitor apps |
App Description
an identification key for introduced ants
Over 15,000 species of ants have been described, and more than 200 have established populations outside of their native ranges. A small subset of these have become highly destructive invaders including the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), the big-headed ant (Pheidole megacephala), the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes), the little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata), and the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) which are currently listed among the world’s 100 worst invasive species (Lowe et al. 2000). Additionally, two of these species (Linepithema humile and Solenopsis invicta) are among the four most well studied invasive species generally (Pyšek et al. 2008). Although invasive ants are economically costly in both urban and agricultural areas, the most serious consequences of their introduction may be ecological. Invasive ants can greatly modify ecosystems by reducing native ant diversity, displacing other arthropods, negatively impacting vertebrate populations, and disrupting ant-plant mutualisms.
Invasive ants form a small and somewhat distinct subset of ants introduced into new environments by humans. A majority of introduced ants remain confined to human-modified habitats and some of these species are often referred to as tramp ants because of their reliance on human-mediated dispersal and close association with humans generally. Although hundreds of ant species have become established outside of their native ranges, most research has concentrated on the biology of only a few species.
Antkey is a community resource for the identification of invasive, introduced and commonly intercepted ant species from across the globe.
This key was designed to be used with the “Find Best” function. Find best is invoked by tapping on the wand icon on the navigation bar, or by selecting the Find Best option in the navigation drawer.
Authors: Eli M. Sarnat and Andrew V. Suarez
Original source: This key is part of the complete Antkey tool at http://antkey.org (requires internet connection). External links are provided in the fact sheets for convenience, but they also require an internet connection. Full references for all citations may be found at the Antkey website, along with distribution maps, behavior videos, a fully illustrated glossary, and more.
This key was developed in cooperation with the USDA APHIS ITP Identification Technology Program. Please visit http://idtools.org to learn more.
Mobile app updated: August, 2024
