Antkey Mobile
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 130 keywords for Antkey Mobile in Google Play
Antkey Mobile tracks 130 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 130 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 41.6.
an identification key for introduced ants
Tracked keywords
130
0 ranked • 130 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: fire
Avg difficulty
41.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.7
fire
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,451
- 60.3
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 313
- 62.6
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 239
- 65.0
outside
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 715
- 63.1
remain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 473
Unranked opportunities
fire
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 1,451
plant
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 313
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 239
outside
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Competitors: 715
remain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 473
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 375,249 • Major competitors: 23,968
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
find
Total apps: 302,834 • Major competitors: 17,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed
Total apps: 264,190 • Major competitors: 8,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
best
Total apps: 250,470 • Major competitors: 18,391
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
complete
Total apps: 167,566 • Major competitors: 9,339
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 250,470 competing apps Median installs: 4,208 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 18,391 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 375,249 competing apps Median installs: 2,984 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 23,968 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 71 | 100 | 50 | 71 30,354 competing apps Median installs: 1,812 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,238 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 16,441 competing apps Median installs: 1,512 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 918 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 141,355 competing apps Median installs: 2,298 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 7,061 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,205 competing apps Median installs: 3,092 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,232 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 264,190 competing apps Median installs: 798 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,559 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 302,834 competing apps Median installs: 2,786 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 17,561 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 47,086 competing apps Median installs: 3,036 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,518 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 113,460 competing apps Median installs: 1,424 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,639 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 131,189 competing apps Median installs: 2,542 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,751 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 52,696 competing apps Median installs: 2,171 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,931 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,218 competing apps Median installs: 2,744 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,000 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 56,437 competing apps Median installs: 2,177 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,887 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 83,587 competing apps Median installs: 548 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,677 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 167,566 competing apps Median installs: 2,280 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 9,339 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 99,810 competing apps Median installs: 1,336 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,051 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 68,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,810 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,236 major competitor apps |
| become | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 103,814 competing apps Median installs: 5,314 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 9,768 major competitor apps |
| internet | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,271 competing apps Median installs: 4,125 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,931 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 53 | 81 129,568 competing apps Median installs: 4,943 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,079 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 61 | 79 84,826 competing apps Median installs: 1,690 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| hundreds | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 28,524 competing apps Median installs: 5,458 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,417 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 131,251 competing apps Median installs: 3,127 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,640 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,463 competing apps Median installs: 3,421 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,315 major competitor apps |
App Description
an identification key for introduced ants
Over 15,000 species of ants have been described, and more than 200 have established populations outside of their native ranges. A small subset of these have become highly destructive invaders including the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), the big-headed ant (Pheidole megacephala), the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes), the little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata), and the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) which are currently listed among the world’s 100 worst invasive species (Lowe et al. 2000). Additionally, two of these species (Linepithema humile and Solenopsis invicta) are among the four most well studied invasive species generally (Pyšek et al. 2008). Although invasive ants are economically costly in both urban and agricultural areas, the most serious consequences of their introduction may be ecological. Invasive ants can greatly modify ecosystems by reducing native ant diversity, displacing other arthropods, negatively impacting vertebrate populations, and disrupting ant-plant mutualisms.
Invasive ants form a small and somewhat distinct subset of ants introduced into new environments by humans. A majority of introduced ants remain confined to human-modified habitats and some of these species are often referred to as tramp ants because of their reliance on human-mediated dispersal and close association with humans generally. Although hundreds of ant species have become established outside of their native ranges, most research has concentrated on the biology of only a few species.
Antkey is a community resource for the identification of invasive, introduced and commonly intercepted ant species from across the globe.
This key was designed to be used with the “Find Best” function. Find best is invoked by tapping on the wand icon on the navigation bar, or by selecting the Find Best option in the navigation drawer.
Authors: Eli M. Sarnat and Andrew V. Suarez
Original source: This key is part of the complete Antkey tool at http://antkey.org (requires internet connection). External links are provided in the fact sheets for convenience, but they also require an internet connection. Full references for all citations may be found at the Antkey website, along with distribution maps, behavior videos, a fully illustrated glossary, and more.
This key was developed in cooperation with the USDA APHIS ITP Identification Technology Program. Please visit http://idtools.org to learn more.
Mobile app updated: August, 2024
