Antkey Mobile
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 130 keywords for Antkey Mobile in Google Play
Antkey Mobile tracks 130 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 130 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 45.2.
an identification key for introduced ants
Tracked keywords
130
0 ranked • 130 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: often
Avg difficulty
45.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 68.3
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 877
- 68.6
icon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,128
- 68.5
close
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,168
- 68.6
four
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,186
Unranked opportunities
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 877
icon
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 55.3 • Competitors: 1,128
close
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 51.5 • Competitors: 1,168
four
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.5 • Competitors: 1,186
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
find
Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
please
Total apps: 75,311 • Major competitors: 7,632
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 72 | 100 | 58 | 70 12,601 competing apps Median installs: 27,732 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,141 major competitor apps |
| external | 72 | 100 | 55 | 66 6,882 competing apps Median installs: 37,392 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 869 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 65 | 88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,874 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,446 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,828 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 57 | 75 23,850 competing apps Median installs: 31,586 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,738 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,891 competing apps Median installs: 33,950 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,961 competing apps Median installs: 32,987 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,750 major competitor apps |
| community | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,102 competing apps Median installs: 24,182 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,517 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 73,791 competing apps Median installs: 37,773 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,679 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,793 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 31,519 competing apps Median installs: 30,635 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,488 major competitor apps |
| become | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 59,069 competing apps Median installs: 60,770 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,342 major competitor apps |
| internet | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 62,322 competing apps Median installs: 30,196 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,670 major competitor apps |
| please | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 75,311 competing apps Median installs: 36,602 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,632 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 81 | 78 38,391 competing apps Median installs: 39,224 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 5,234 major competitor apps |
| hundreds | 71 | 100 | 57 | 72 16,319 competing apps Median installs: 56,862 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 2,646 major competitor apps |
| full | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 67,878 competing apps Median installs: 40,620 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,324 major competitor apps |
| two | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 30,958 competing apps Median installs: 35,508 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,566 major competitor apps |
App Description
an identification key for introduced ants
Over 15,000 species of ants have been described, and more than 200 have established populations outside of their native ranges. A small subset of these have become highly destructive invaders including the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), the big-headed ant (Pheidole megacephala), the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes), the little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata), and the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) which are currently listed among the world’s 100 worst invasive species (Lowe et al. 2000). Additionally, two of these species (Linepithema humile and Solenopsis invicta) are among the four most well studied invasive species generally (Pyšek et al. 2008). Although invasive ants are economically costly in both urban and agricultural areas, the most serious consequences of their introduction may be ecological. Invasive ants can greatly modify ecosystems by reducing native ant diversity, displacing other arthropods, negatively impacting vertebrate populations, and disrupting ant-plant mutualisms.
Invasive ants form a small and somewhat distinct subset of ants introduced into new environments by humans. A majority of introduced ants remain confined to human-modified habitats and some of these species are often referred to as tramp ants because of their reliance on human-mediated dispersal and close association with humans generally. Although hundreds of ant species have become established outside of their native ranges, most research has concentrated on the biology of only a few species.
Antkey is a community resource for the identification of invasive, introduced and commonly intercepted ant species from across the globe.
This key was designed to be used with the “Find Best” function. Find best is invoked by tapping on the wand icon on the navigation bar, or by selecting the Find Best option in the navigation drawer.
Authors: Eli M. Sarnat and Andrew V. Suarez
Original source: This key is part of the complete Antkey tool at http://antkey.org (requires internet connection). External links are provided in the fact sheets for convenience, but they also require an internet connection. Full references for all citations may be found at the Antkey website, along with distribution maps, behavior videos, a fully illustrated glossary, and more.
This key was developed in cooperation with the USDA APHIS ITP Identification Technology Program. Please visit http://idtools.org to learn more.
Mobile app updated: August, 2024
