Gait Analyzer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for Gait Analyzer in Google Play
Gait Analyzer tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 47.7.
Real-time analysis of your walking under single and dual-task conditions.
Tracked keywords
85
0 ranked • 85 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: continuously
Avg difficulty
47.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.1
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 506
- 60.2
reaction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 245
- 62.8
asked
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 351
- 63.5
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 395
- 62.6
valid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 454
Unranked opportunities
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 506
reaction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 245
asked
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 351
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 395
valid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 454
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
available
Total apps: 198,627 • Major competitors: 9,718
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,587
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
even
Total apps: 157,949 • Major competitors: 10,655
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| single | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 74,510 competing apps Median installs: 1,867 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,970 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 141,210 competing apps Median installs: 494 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,042 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 62 | 83 151,879 competing apps Median installs: 2,662 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,546 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 83,331 competing apps Median installs: 1,280 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,798 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 156,061 competing apps Median installs: 2,756 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 9,506 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 60 | 71 28,900 competing apps Median installs: 4,450 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,184 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,101 competing apps Median installs: 2,143 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,302 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 385,850 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 16,372 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 198,627 competing apps Median installs: 2,067 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 9,718 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 137,173 competing apps Median installs: 1,374 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,451 major competitor apps |
| task | 72 | 100 | 52 | 69 22,246 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,077 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 17,209 competing apps Median installs: 496 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 362 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,461 competing apps Median installs: 2,011 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,876 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 44,311 competing apps Median installs: 3,270 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,288 major competitor apps |
| second | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 23,978 competing apps Median installs: 1,907 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,112 major competitor apps |
| continuously | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,205 competing apps Median installs: 2,003 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 506 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 79 | 76 62,815 competing apps Median installs: 2,638 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,098 major competitor apps | |
| generate | 71 | 100 | 50 | 72 32,047 competing apps Median installs: 1,177 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,225 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,128 major competitor apps |
| coming | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 21,935 competing apps Median installs: 2,437 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,245 major competitor apps |
| tasks | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 29,675 competing apps Median installs: 1,211 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| smartphone | 71 | 100 | 47 | 74 41,130 competing apps Median installs: 2,195 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,722 major competitor apps |
App Description
Real-time analysis of your walking under single and dual-task conditions.
Take a look at the app's user guide.
* Single- and dual-task cognitive and gait options available. The cognitive test is currently auditory Stroop, with users asked to respond to the pitch of the word, rather than the spoken word. Outcome parameters include reaction time and accuracy. More cognitive tasks coming soon as well.
* Computed gait data can be calculated over a given duration (e.g. 10 second trials), continuously until stopped, and even run all day in the background of your phone (In beta testing now)!
* Save your data locally to a comma-delimited csv file or upload to Google Drive to further analyze at your convenience.
* Just provide your body height and get started! Other optional demographic information can be provided, and will allow you to compare your walking characteristics to other gender- age- location- matched individuals (coming soon!).
* Analyze your historical gait and cognitive data.
* Generate user specific pdf reports.
* The methodology has previously been used to assess dual-task smartphone usage and has been shown to be valid and reliable:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28961548
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445278
