Gait Analyzer
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for Gait Analyzer in Google Play
Gait Analyzer tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 46.4.
Real-time analysis of your walking under single and dual-task conditions.
Tracked keywords
85
0 ranked • 85 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: continuously
Avg difficulty
46.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.2
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 572
- 60.0
reaction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 262
- 62.9
asked
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 390
- 63.7
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 443
- 62.6
valid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 495
Unranked opportunities
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 572
reaction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 262
asked
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 390
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 443
valid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 495
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 391,506 • Major competitors: 18,148
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
information
Total apps: 263,929 • Major competitors: 8,123
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
available
Total apps: 194,110 • Major competitors: 10,361
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
data
Total apps: 176,422 • Major competitors: 7,038
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
even
Total apps: 159,396 • Major competitors: 11,732
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| single | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 73,017 competing apps Median installs: 2,392 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,202 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 139,883 competing apps Median installs: 559 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,295 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 150,304 competing apps Median installs: 3,576 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 9,391 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 81,436 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,015 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,820 competing apps Median installs: 1,373 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,538 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 263,929 competing apps Median installs: 1,195 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,123 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,300 competing apps Median installs: 3,098 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 153,335 competing apps Median installs: 3,548 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 10,249 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 57 | 71 28,451 competing apps Median installs: 6,145 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,388 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,316 competing apps Median installs: 2,589 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,434 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 391,506 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,148 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 194,110 competing apps Median installs: 2,782 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 10,361 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 138,055 competing apps Median installs: 1,609 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,049 major competitor apps |
| task | 72 | 100 | 50 | 69 21,902 competing apps Median installs: 1,440 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,188 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 17,399 competing apps Median installs: 571 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 423 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 94,800 competing apps Median installs: 2,157 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,221 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 43,620 competing apps Median installs: 4,000 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,595 major competitor apps |
| second | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 23,495 competing apps Median installs: 2,514 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,191 major competitor apps |
| continuously | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,319 competing apps Median installs: 2,354 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 74 | 76 61,911 competing apps Median installs: 3,150 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,329 major competitor apps | |
| generate | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 31,214 competing apps Median installs: 1,371 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,310 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 139,601 competing apps Median installs: 2,019 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,519 major competitor apps |
| coming | 72 | 100 | 46 | 69 22,137 competing apps Median installs: 2,769 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,373 major competitor apps |
| tasks | 71 | 100 | 48 | 71 29,927 competing apps Median installs: 1,376 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,616 major competitor apps |
| smartphone | 71 | 100 | 47 | 74 40,801 competing apps Median installs: 2,770 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,860 major competitor apps |
App Description
Real-time analysis of your walking under single and dual-task conditions.
Take a look at the app's user guide.
* Single- and dual-task cognitive and gait options available. The cognitive test is currently auditory Stroop, with users asked to respond to the pitch of the word, rather than the spoken word. Outcome parameters include reaction time and accuracy. More cognitive tasks coming soon as well.
* Computed gait data can be calculated over a given duration (e.g. 10 second trials), continuously until stopped, and even run all day in the background of your phone (In beta testing now)!
* Save your data locally to a comma-delimited csv file or upload to Google Drive to further analyze at your convenience.
* Just provide your body height and get started! Other optional demographic information can be provided, and will allow you to compare your walking characteristics to other gender- age- location- matched individuals (coming soon!).
* Analyze your historical gait and cognitive data.
* Generate user specific pdf reports.
* The methodology has previously been used to assess dual-task smartphone usage and has been shown to be valid and reliable:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28961548
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445278
