Cargo Surveyor
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 166 keywords for Cargo Surveyor in Google Play
Cargo Surveyor tracks 166 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 166 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.4, difficulty 43.3.
The most complete toolset for cargo / bunker surveyors / other oil professionals
Tracked keywords
166
0 ranked • 166 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.4
Top keyword: api
Avg difficulty
43.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.0
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 398
- 65.9
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,136
- 62.8
soft
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 424
- 64.3
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 395
- 63.0
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 436
Unranked opportunities
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 398
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Competitors: 1,136
soft
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 424
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 395
units
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 436
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 390,894 • Major competitors: 18,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.8
using
Total apps: 224,372 • Major competitors: 12,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
way
Total apps: 203,415 • Major competitors: 11,337
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
choose
Total apps: 197,916 • Major competitors: 13,624
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
start
Total apps: 195,327 • Major competitors: 12,774
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| board | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 28,196 competing apps Median installs: 2,501 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,625 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 68,780 competing apps Median installs: 2,549 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,063 major competitor apps | |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 56,468 competing apps Median installs: 4,946 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,365 major competitor apps |
| whether | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 194,949 competing apps Median installs: 948 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,802 major competitor apps |
| environment | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,296 competing apps Median installs: 2,168 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,088 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,567 competing apps Median installs: 1,371 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,503 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 32,308 competing apps Median installs: 1,211 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,115 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 103,865 competing apps Median installs: 1,505 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,133 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 31,829 competing apps Median installs: 1,814 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,475 major competitor apps |
| setting | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 23,201 competing apps Median installs: 3,735 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,344 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,130 competing apps Median installs: 3,080 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,201 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 203,415 competing apps Median installs: 1,963 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 11,337 major competitor apps |
| choose | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 197,916 competing apps Median installs: 2,802 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 13,624 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,372 competing apps Median installs: 2,821 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,284 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 390,894 competing apps Median installs: 1,407 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,018 major competitor apps |
| api | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 13,791 competing apps Median installs: 460 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 398 major competitor apps |
| company | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,553 competing apps Median installs: 1,157 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,381 major competitor apps |
| install | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,568 competing apps Median installs: 3,201 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,820 major competitor apps |
| special | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 109,662 competing apps Median installs: 2,192 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,049 major competitor apps |
| volume | 74 | 100 | 49 | 66 13,625 competing apps Median installs: 6,700 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,136 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 35,236 competing apps Median installs: 6,284 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,676 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 129,454 competing apps Median installs: 977 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,501 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 195,327 competing apps Median installs: 2,663 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 12,774 major competitor apps |
| tables | 73 | 100 | 39 | 59 5,065 competing apps Median installs: 2,890 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 167,762 competing apps Median installs: 2,275 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 9,356 major competitor apps |
App Description
The most complete toolset for cargo / bunker surveyors / other oil professionals
The most complete toolset for cargo and bunker surveyors, as well as other professionals in the oil industry!
The app replaces laptop, hard copy ASTM tables and printed company forms used by cargo surveyors on board oil tankers.
Do your complete cargo surveys with this app and produce:
- Ullage reports
- Transfer (executive) summaries, both for ship and for client
- Bunker survey reports
- Notices of apparent discrepancy
- Statements of facts
- VEF reports
- Slop reports
- Sampling reports
- Pre-loading reports
- Master's receipt of samples reports
- Reference heights and raw measurements reports
- OBQ and ROB reports
- Time sheets
Tools include:
- Bottom Lines Calculator
- Wedge Calculator
- Pre Cargo Matrix for getting advice on required tank cleaning prior to loading next cargo
Reports can be emailed directly from the app as a pdf or jpg attachment and can be transferred to a desktop computer for printing.
All reports can be written using either SI Metric or Imperial standards, using mixed units in the respective editors as required by the user. The user can e.g. enter temperatures in deg C while producing an ullage report, but have the report printed using deg F by setting the environment to Imperial standard etc.
Weights and volumes can be calculated using both SI metric and Imperial standards, and both the ASTM 1980 and 2004 version tables are included for the user to choose from.
The app can calculate for crude oil, products, lubrication oils, chemicals (such as vegetable oil) and special applications such as denatured ethanol.
To assist with OBQ/ROB quantity calculation, a configurable wedge calculator is included which accepts input in both SI Metric and Imperial units. The user can choose whether to use table volume data or tank dimensions for the wedge calculation.
In the general settings screen the user can choose whether calculations are done using Si Metric or Imperial units, and whether ASTM tables version 1980 or 2004 is used.
All calculations are done conform the latest API MPMS recommendations.
In the report settings screen the user can import his company logo by tranfering his logo picture to the phone. At any one time two logos can be saved, one as the default and one as the active logo.
Also in the report settings screen 4 default email addresses can be entered using the address book.
The notices of discrepancy and statement of facts section contains a number of templates as well as a fully customisable version of each.
Ullage reports are fully configurable regarding number of tanks (maximum is 53 tanks), with as many grades as required, and ullages/temperatures/volumes/densities can be entered as either SI Metric or Imperial units.
Inline conversion for all of these can be done within the app by pressing the appropriate unit button.
There is no limit to the number of reports that can be saved. Existing reports can be copied and used as a template for the next project.
The user can name all reports in any way desired, bearing in mind that spaces are automatically replaced with underscores, and names should only start with a letter, not a number or other character.
