Kubaturnik Lite
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 41 keywords for Kubaturnik Lite in Google Play
Kubaturnik Lite tracks 41 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 41 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 50.1.
App for calculating the cubic capacity of round timber, boards and cylinders.
Tracked keywords
41
0 ranked • 41 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: cost
Avg difficulty
50.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 980
- 70.2
section
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,080
- 70.4
saving
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,633
- 63.6
calculation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 344
- 63.4
round
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 600
Unranked opportunities
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 980
section
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,080
saving
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 1,633
calculation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 344
round
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 600
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
even
Total apps: 88,180 • Major competitors: 12,732
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.3
phone
Total apps: 75,756 • Major competitors: 9,010
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.9
save
Total apps: 75,490 • Major competitors: 9,726
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.3
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phone | 67 | 100 | 69 | 83 75,756 competing apps Median installs: 37,780 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 9,010 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,915 competing apps Median installs: 29,599 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 75,490 competing apps Median installs: 41,387 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 9,726 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 56 | 73 18,347 competing apps Median installs: 30,163 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 30,608 competing apps Median installs: 31,194 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,175 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 68 | 77 34,126 competing apps Median installs: 44,996 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,901 major competitor apps |
| tables | 71 | 100 | 44 | 58 2,619 competing apps Median installs: 34,612 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 286 major competitor apps |
| click | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 35,009 competing apps Median installs: 38,208 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,894 major competitor apps |
| quick | 68 | 100 | 62 | 81 53,200 competing apps Median installs: 33,498 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,079 major competitor apps |
| archive | 70 | 100 | 39 | 56 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 30,995 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| saving | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 13,263 competing apps Median installs: 38,092 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,633 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 43 | 64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| entire | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 18,707 competing apps Median installs: 27,720 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,780 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 26,003 competing apps Median installs: 32,925 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,321 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| summary | 71 | 100 | 63 | 62 4,055 competing apps Median installs: 27,085 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 271 major competitor apps |
| log | 71 | 100 | 50 | 72 15,536 competing apps Median installs: 36,792 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,745 major competitor apps |
| cost | 73 | 100 | 48 | 69 10,513 competing apps Median installs: 29,271 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 980 major competitor apps |
| even | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 88,180 competing apps Median installs: 47,246 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 12,732 major competitor apps |
| round | 72 | 100 | 44 | 63 5,109 competing apps Median installs: 35,448 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 600 major competitor apps |
| method | 72 | 100 | 46 | 67 8,465 competing apps Median installs: 32,829 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 790 major competitor apps |
| form | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,937 competing apps Median installs: 35,119 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,904 major competitor apps |
| specific | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 26,226 competing apps Median installs: 27,691 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,394 major competitor apps |
| end | 70 | 100 | 60 | 75 23,924 competing apps Median installs: 35,008 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,756 major competitor apps |
App Description
App for calculating the cubic capacity of round timber, boards and cylinders.
What are the conveniences of a cubature:
— entering data with one click on one working screen;
— expanded characteristics of each log;
— adding photos to a specific log or to the entire calculation;
— summary table of calculation results;
— archive of calculations.
Possibilities:
— calculation of cubic capacity according to GOST 2708-75;
— calculation of lumber cubic capacity;
— cubic capacity calculation according to ISO 4480-83;
— calculation of the cubic capacity of the logs according to the tables OST 13-232-87;
— calculation using the end section method (GOST 32594-2013);
— calculation of the cubic capacity of a rounded log;
— calculation of the cost of cubic capacity;
— selection of diameters for acceptance: even / odd;
— saving on the phone in the form of a summary table of the “dot” type;
