Kubaturnik Lite
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 41 keywords for Kubaturnik Lite in Google Play
Kubaturnik Lite tracks 41 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 41 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 45.3.
App for calculating the cubic capacity of round timber, boards and cylinders.
Tracked keywords
41
0 ranked • 41 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: summary
Avg difficulty
45.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 274
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
- 65.4
round
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 691
- 65.1
entering
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 544
- 60.3
characteristics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 307
Unranked opportunities
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 274
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 381
round
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 691
entering
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 544
characteristics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 307
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 221,317 • Major competitors: 12,105
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
data
Total apps: 182,594 • Major competitors: 7,201
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
save
Total apps: 157,906 • Major competitors: 10,389
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
even
Total apps: 156,922 • Major competitors: 11,487
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.1
phone
Total apps: 152,927 • Major competitors: 9,500
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 152,927 competing apps Median installs: 3,552 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,500 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 32,785 competing apps Median installs: 1,226 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,127 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 157,906 competing apps Median installs: 3,443 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 10,389 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 43,170 competing apps Median installs: 1,780 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,831 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 221,317 competing apps Median installs: 2,899 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 12,105 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 75,918 competing apps Median installs: 1,506 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,384 major competitor apps |
| photos | 70 | 100 | 57 | 76 61,498 competing apps Median installs: 4,010 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,449 major competitor apps |
| tables | 73 | 100 | 39 | 59 4,988 competing apps Median installs: 3,011 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 253 major competitor apps |
| click | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 67,102 competing apps Median installs: 4,332 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,032 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 143,148 competing apps Median installs: 1,453 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,849 major competitor apps |
| archive | 73 | 100 | 37 | 58 4,311 competing apps Median installs: 2,637 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 201 major competitor apps |
| saving | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,746 competing apps Median installs: 1,776 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,748 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,628 competing apps Median installs: 2,008 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 381 major competitor apps |
| entire | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 46,231 competing apps Median installs: 1,620 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,891 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,303 competing apps Median installs: 4,464 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,089 major competitor apps |
| data | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 182,594 competing apps Median installs: 1,338 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,201 major competitor apps |
| summary | 75 | 100 | 49 | 64 10,052 competing apps Median installs: 1,424 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| log | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 40,866 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,919 major competitor apps |
| cost | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 23,287 competing apps Median installs: 2,410 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,024 major competitor apps |
| even | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 156,922 competing apps Median installs: 4,220 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 11,487 major competitor apps |
| round | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,732 competing apps Median installs: 2,132 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 691 major competitor apps |
| method | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,558 competing apps Median installs: 2,909 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 818 major competitor apps |
| form | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,882 competing apps Median installs: 3,775 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,010 major competitor apps |
| specific | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 67,023 competing apps Median installs: 1,370 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,584 major competitor apps |
| end | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 48,999 competing apps Median installs: 3,477 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,929 major competitor apps |
App Description
App for calculating the cubic capacity of round timber, boards and cylinders.
What are the conveniences of a cubature:
— entering data with one click on one working screen;
— expanded characteristics of each log;
— adding photos to a specific log or to the entire calculation;
— summary table of calculation results;
— archive of calculations.
Possibilities:
— calculation of cubic capacity according to GOST 2708-75;
— calculation of lumber cubic capacity;
— cubic capacity calculation according to ISO 4480-83;
— calculation of the cubic capacity of the logs according to the tables OST 13-232-87;
— calculation using the end section method (GOST 32594-2013);
— calculation of the cubic capacity of a rounded log;
— calculation of the cost of cubic capacity;
— selection of diameters for acceptance: even / odd;
— saving on the phone in the form of a summary table of the “dot” type;
