Kubaturnik Lite
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 41 keywords for Kubaturnik Lite in Google Play
Kubaturnik Lite tracks 41 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 41 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 45.4.
App for calculating the cubic capacity of round timber, boards and cylinders.
Tracked keywords
41
0 ranked • 41 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: calculation
Avg difficulty
45.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.1
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 375
- 63.7
summary
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 265
- 65.1
round
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 664
- 65.3
entering
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 563
- 60.5
characteristics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 311
Unranked opportunities
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 375
summary
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 265
round
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 664
entering
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 563
characteristics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 311
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 224,577 • Major competitors: 12,356
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
data
Total apps: 177,045 • Major competitors: 7,061
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
even
Total apps: 159,218 • Major competitors: 11,701
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.8
save
Total apps: 153,786 • Major competitors: 10,271
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
phone
Total apps: 150,575 • Major competitors: 9,405
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 150,575 competing apps Median installs: 3,560 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 9,405 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 32,290 competing apps Median installs: 1,214 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,115 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 153,786 competing apps Median installs: 3,526 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 10,271 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,395 competing apps Median installs: 1,808 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,808 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,356 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 74,503 competing apps Median installs: 1,496 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,331 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 57 | 76 62,379 competing apps Median installs: 3,922 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,522 major competitor apps |
| tables | 73 | 100 | 39 | 59 5,068 competing apps Median installs: 2,892 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| click | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 66,332 competing apps Median installs: 4,351 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,990 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 137,975 competing apps Median installs: 1,440 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,694 major competitor apps |
| archive | 73 | 100 | 37 | 58 4,186 competing apps Median installs: 2,621 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| saving | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,143 competing apps Median installs: 1,771 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,720 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,186 competing apps Median installs: 2,058 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 375 major competitor apps |
| entire | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 45,064 competing apps Median installs: 1,619 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,857 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,864 competing apps Median installs: 4,393 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,127 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 57 | 84 177,045 competing apps Median installs: 1,350 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,061 major competitor apps |
| summary | 74 | 100 | 49 | 64 9,848 competing apps Median installs: 1,425 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 265 major competitor apps |
| log | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 39,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,267 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,885 major competitor apps |
| cost | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 22,779 competing apps Median installs: 2,429 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,016 major competitor apps |
| even | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 159,218 competing apps Median installs: 4,101 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 11,701 major competitor apps |
| round | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,149 competing apps Median installs: 2,190 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 664 major competitor apps |
| method | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,344 competing apps Median installs: 2,928 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 806 major competitor apps |
| form | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,265 competing apps Median installs: 3,778 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,985 major competitor apps |
| specific | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 65,438 competing apps Median installs: 1,374 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,533 major competitor apps |
| end | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 47,974 competing apps Median installs: 3,525 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,895 major competitor apps |
App Description
App for calculating the cubic capacity of round timber, boards and cylinders.
What are the conveniences of a cubature:
— entering data with one click on one working screen;
— expanded characteristics of each log;
— adding photos to a specific log or to the entire calculation;
— summary table of calculation results;
— archive of calculations.
Possibilities:
— calculation of cubic capacity according to GOST 2708-75;
— calculation of lumber cubic capacity;
— cubic capacity calculation according to ISO 4480-83;
— calculation of the cubic capacity of the logs according to the tables OST 13-232-87;
— calculation using the end section method (GOST 32594-2013);
— calculation of the cubic capacity of a rounded log;
— calculation of the cost of cubic capacity;
— selection of diameters for acceptance: even / odd;
— saving on the phone in the form of a summary table of the “dot” type;
