Feedlot Atlas

Developer: Merck Sharp &

Category: Business

3.3K installs

Ratings not yet available

+6 weekly installs

trend steady

+35 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 57 keywords for Feedlot Atlas in Google Play

Developer: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC Category: business

Feedlot Atlas tracks 57 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 57 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 46.8.

Provides users reference photos for different diseases in cattle practice

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 57 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.6

Top keyword: intended

Avg difficulty

46.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

intended

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 786
67.7
animals

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,471
67.2
conditions

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,349
68.9
body

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,381
70.0
spanish

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 477
62.8

Unranked opportunities

intended

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Competitors: 786
animals

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.5 • Competitors: 1,471
conditions

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,349
body

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 1,381
spanish

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 477

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
different

Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
available

Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
provides

Total apps: 71,787 • Major competitors: 6,088

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
provide

Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
images	69	100	59	78 37,077 competing apps Median installs: 30,933 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,614 major competitor apps
users	67	100	60	82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,026 major competitor apps
live	67	100	63	81 57,913 competing apps Median installs: 32,026 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,601 major competitor apps
collection	68	100	54	80 49,948 competing apps Median installs: 28,272 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,345 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	55	82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	5,453 major competitor apps
help	65	100	66	87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,840 major competitor apps
photos	69	100	68	77 34,126 competing apps Median installs: 44,996 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,901 major competitor apps
diagnostic	70	100	53	55 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 19,557 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	105 major competitor apps
comprehensive	70	100	49	76 27,977 competing apps Median installs: 22,814 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	2,001 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	60	83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,088 major competitor apps
contains	69	100	50	78 38,895 competing apps Median installs: 27,025 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	2,326 major competitor apps
user	67	100	60	82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	4,926 major competitor apps
different	66	100	62	85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,575 major competitor apps
main	69	100	53	77 32,327 competing apps Median installs: 33,651 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,349 major competitor apps
animals	72	100	48	67 8,525 competing apps Median installs: 72,126 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,471 major competitor apps
well	68	100	54	80 46,736 competing apps Median installs: 30,414 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,373 major competitor apps
conditions	72	100	49	69 10,721 competing apps Median installs: 44,957 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,349 major competitor apps
encountered	69	100	32	47 539 competing apps Median installs: 26,566 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	49 major competitor apps
system	69	100	58	78 39,167 competing apps Median installs: 26,677 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,528 major competitor apps
high	68	100	58	80 49,801 competing apps Median installs: 38,359 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,873 major competitor apps
body	72	100	49	70 12,539 competing apps Median installs: 33,589 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,381 major competitor apps
practice	70	100	53	75 23,394 competing apps Median installs: 26,136 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,921 major competitor apps
pictures	71	100	55	73 19,824 competing apps Median installs: 39,884 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,596 major competitor apps

App Description

Provides users reference photos for different diseases in cattle practice

The Feedlot Atlas app is intended to help veterinary students, technicians, clinicians, specialists, and cattle producers. It contains a thorough and comprehensive collection of feedlot cattle diseases that ranges from rare conditions of unknown etiology to very well understood and common diseases, with 10 chapters arranged by body system available in Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish.

There are over 700 educational, highly informative high resolution images in the atlas. Although most of the images are of postmortem lesions, pictures of clinical findings in live animals are also included where applicable. Postmortem examination has been and continues to be the main diagnostic procedure used for feedlot cattle diseases.

The aim of this atlas is to provide the user with reference photographs of different lesions and diseases encountered in cattle practice.