Operational Oceanography
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 46 keywords for Operational Oceanography in Google Play
Operational Oceanography tracks 46 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 45 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.7, difficulty 43.1, best rank 8.
Monitoring, observational and operational oceanography.
Tracked keywords
46
1 ranked • 45 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 8 • Latest leader 8
Avg opportunity
71.7
Top keyword: operational
Avg difficulty
43.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.6
operational
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank 8
Competitors: 75
- 62.9
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
- 65.5
entry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 330
- 63.5
developing
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 416
- 63.2
law
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 317
Unranked opportunities
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 381
entry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 330
developing
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 416
law
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 317
animals
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 1,280
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,792 • Major competitors: 10,253
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
data
Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
live
Total apps: 143,239 • Major competitors: 6,365
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
key
Total apps: 120,316 • Major competitors: 5,380
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| operational | 74 | 100 | 38 | 63 8,495 competing apps Median installs: 263 Avg rating: 1.6 | 8 | 8 | 75 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 116,161 competing apps Median installs: 1,484 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,252 major competitor apps |
| live | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 143,239 competing apps Median installs: 1,368 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,365 major competitor apps |
| particularly | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,456 competing apps Median installs: 1,516 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,277 competing apps Median installs: 490 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,440 major competitor apps |
| modern | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 78,102 competing apps Median installs: 979 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,243 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 2,136 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,289 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,792 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,253 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,316 competing apps Median installs: 1,103 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,380 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 68,818 competing apps Median installs: 363 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,561 major competitor apps |
| effective | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 37,727 competing apps Median installs: 921 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,135 major competitor apps |
| applied | 74 | 100 | 43 | 63 8,912 competing apps Median installs: 4,328 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 381 major competitor apps |
| entry | 74 | 100 | 44 | 65 12,901 competing apps Median installs: 966 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 330 major competitor apps |
| assist | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 18,574 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 712 major competitor apps |
| tablet | 72 | 100 | 59 | 70 23,885 competing apps Median installs: 4,056 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,422 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 181,410 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,597 major competitor apps |
| resources | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 35,018 competing apps Median installs: 801 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 987 major competitor apps |
| developing | 74 | 100 | 41 | 64 9,772 competing apps Median installs: 2,324 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 416 major competitor apps |
| energy | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 25,599 competing apps Median installs: 963 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 805 major competitor apps |
| law | 74 | 100 | 40 | 63 9,256 competing apps Median installs: 2,204 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| animals | 74 | 100 | 46 | 66 13,362 competing apps Median installs: 9,644 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,280 major competitor apps |
| marine | 73 | 100 | 35 | 55 3,053 competing apps Median installs: 1,020 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 128 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,394 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 583 major competitor apps |
| scientific | 74 | 100 | 43 | 64 10,924 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
App Description
Monitoring, observational and operational oceanography.
Based in South Africa, CFOO was established with the intent on developing in-situ monitoring, observational and operational oceanography in conjunction with marine species management, particularly Endangered species. In achieving this, CFOO will incorporate training, education, human capacity development, scientific research, R & D, engineering and renewable energy applications. Accessibility using modern techniques is key to the effective use of the resources available, particularly the live data. This will include ‘in-field’ data entry via mobile or tablet for tracking animals and assist environmental law enforcement.