GAtec PER
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for GAtec PER in Google Play
GAtec PER tracks 58 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 58 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 49.1.
A new way to monitor losses in the harvesting process
Tracked keywords
58
0 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: reduce
Avg difficulty
49.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 913
- 68.5
organized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 763
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 62.2
efficiency
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 318
- 69.7
strategic
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,652
Unranked opportunities
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 913
organized
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 763
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
efficiency
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 318
strategic
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,652
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
way
Total apps: 89,339 • Major competitors: 10,854
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.0
even
Total apps: 88,180 • Major competitors: 12,732
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,945 major competitor apps |
| modern | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 27,345 competing apps Median installs: 33,314 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,186 major competitor apps |
| new way | 71 | 100 | 61 | 61 3,695 competing apps Median installs: 34,282 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 69 | 100 | 56 | 79 39,579 competing apps Median installs: 28,449 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,140 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 72 | 100 | 40 | 62 4,373 competing apps Median installs: 18,172 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 318 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 19,087 competing apps Median installs: 23,470 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,617 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| managing | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 15,473 competing apps Median installs: 19,742 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,239 major competitor apps |
| strategic | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 12,011 competing apps Median installs: 40,962 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,652 major competitor apps |
| ensures | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,651 competing apps Median installs: 30,658 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,038 major competitor apps |
| without | 65 | 100 | 63 | 86 113,596 competing apps Median installs: 37,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 12,654 major competitor apps |
| companies | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,321 competing apps Median installs: 22,864 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 532 major competitor apps |
| internet | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 62,322 competing apps Median installs: 30,196 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,670 major competitor apps |
| safe | 70 | 100 | 65 | 76 27,975 competing apps Median installs: 36,001 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,609 major competitor apps |
| waste | 72 | 100 | 42 | 63 4,758 competing apps Median installs: 25,012 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 428 major competitor apps |
| solution | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 26,114 competing apps Median installs: 18,502 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,816 major competitor apps |
| allowing | 70 | 100 | 54 | 74 22,860 competing apps Median installs: 29,282 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,309 major competitor apps |
| detailed | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 37,199 competing apps Median installs: 28,491 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,729 major competitor apps |
| optimize | 72 | 100 | 48 | 66 6,817 competing apps Median installs: 24,096 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 677 major competitor apps |
| reduce | 73 | 100 | 52 | 68 10,199 competing apps Median installs: 26,550 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 913 major competitor apps |
App Description
A new way to monitor losses in the harvesting process
With the ability to operate offline, PER ensures that data is recorded and accessed at any time, allowing efficient monitoring of losses throughout the workflow. This enables detailed analysis and strategic decision-making to optimize production.
In addition, the application facilitates information management, ensuring safe and organized control. With an intuitive and modern interface, PER makes monitoring losses simpler and more accessible, providing greater efficiency and agility in day-to-day operations.
