GAtec PER
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for GAtec PER in Google Play
GAtec PER tracks 58 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 58 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 46.1.
A new way to monitor losses in the harvesting process
Tracked keywords
58
0 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: new way
Avg difficulty
46.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.1
new way
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 396
- 64.4
waste
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 411
- 63.0
operate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 453
- 65.9
recorded
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 464
- 64.0
production
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 322
Unranked opportunities
new way
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 396
waste
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 411
operate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.2 • Competitors: 453
recorded
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 464
production
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 322
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 370,270 • Major competitors: 21,630
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
without
Total apps: 212,452 • Major competitors: 10,465
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
way
Total apps: 205,299 • Major competitors: 10,422
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 370,270 competing apps Median installs: 2,549 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 21,630 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 135,108 competing apps Median installs: 1,562 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,819 major competitor apps |
| modern | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 77,304 competing apps Median installs: 1,010 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 3,235 major competitor apps |
| new way | 74 | 100 | 51 | 63 9,096 competing apps Median installs: 1,128 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 396 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 205,299 competing apps Median installs: 1,662 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,422 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 116,413 competing apps Median installs: 760 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,119 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,440 competing apps Median installs: 872 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,737 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,430 competing apps Median installs: 381 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 63,818 competing apps Median installs: 523 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,633 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,860 competing apps Median installs: 595 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,169 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 166,176 competing apps Median installs: 1,227 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,004 major competitor apps |
| managing | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 52,040 competing apps Median installs: 601 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,282 major competitor apps |
| strategic | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 28,282 competing apps Median installs: 2,621 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,712 major competitor apps |
| ensures | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 49,163 competing apps Median installs: 556 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,640 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 212,452 competing apps Median installs: 2,784 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,465 major competitor apps |
| companies | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 18,047 competing apps Median installs: 928 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 411 major competitor apps |
| internet | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 121,640 competing apps Median installs: 3,242 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,529 major competitor apps |
| safe | 69 | 100 | 57 | 77 67,174 competing apps Median installs: 1,648 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,596 major competitor apps |
| waste | 74 | 100 | 41 | 64 10,980 competing apps Median installs: 1,597 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 411 major competitor apps |
| solution | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 78,472 competing apps Median installs: 771 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,743 major competitor apps |
| allowing | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 56,554 competing apps Median installs: 983 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,880 major competitor apps |
| detailed | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 101,622 competing apps Median installs: 1,066 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,764 major competitor apps |
| optimize | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 23,780 competing apps Median installs: 462 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 664 major competitor apps |
| reduce | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 24,865 competing apps Median installs: 916 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 767 major competitor apps |
App Description
A new way to monitor losses in the harvesting process
With the ability to operate offline, PER ensures that data is recorded and accessed at any time, allowing efficient monitoring of losses throughout the workflow. This enables detailed analysis and strategic decision-making to optimize production.
In addition, the application facilitates information management, ensuring safe and organized control. With an intuitive and modern interface, PER makes monitoring losses simpler and more accessible, providing greater efficiency and agility in day-to-day operations.
