Heel2Toe Docking Station
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 87 keywords for Heel2Toe Docking Station in Google Play
Heel2Toe Docking Station tracks 87 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 87 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 44.8.
Companion for managing sessions from the Heel2Toe device.
Tracked keywords
87
0 ranked • 87 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: managed
Avg difficulty
44.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.2
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 351
- 63.0
analytics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 186
- 61.1
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
- 61.4
glance
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 329
- 66.3
model
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 834
Unranked opportunities
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 351
analytics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 186
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 123
glance
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 329
model
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 834
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 375,249 • Major competitors: 23,968
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
access
Total apps: 333,757 • Major competitors: 12,342
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
using
Total apps: 224,577 • Major competitors: 12,356
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
view
Total apps: 180,016 • Major competitors: 6,121
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
data
Total apps: 177,045 • Major competitors: 7,061
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 375,249 competing apps Median installs: 2,984 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 23,968 major competitor apps |
| card | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 68,557 competing apps Median installs: 4,435 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,927 major competitor apps |
| page | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 27,992 competing apps Median installs: 3,612 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,603 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,375 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,538 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 58,265 competing apps Median installs: 904 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,196 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 98,545 competing apps Median installs: 3,787 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,548 major competitor apps |
| profile | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 38,221 competing apps Median installs: 1,033 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,729 major competitor apps |
| secure | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 100,780 competing apps Median installs: 1,006 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,482 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,356 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,193 competing apps Median installs: 716 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,435 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 113,460 competing apps Median installs: 1,424 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,639 major competitor apps |
| breakdown | 73 | 100 | 38 | 56 3,107 competing apps Median installs: 1,092 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 124 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 127,092 competing apps Median installs: 2,941 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,846 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 66,599 competing apps Median installs: 412 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,655 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 129,545 competing apps Median installs: 981 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,532 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 333,757 competing apps Median installs: 1,158 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,342 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 15,924 competing apps Median installs: 702 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 325 major competitor apps |
| managed | 74 | 100 | 41 | 64 10,599 competing apps Median installs: 1,370 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 351 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 27,844 competing apps Median installs: 1,304 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 180,016 competing apps Median installs: 913 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,121 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 167,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,649 major competitor apps |
| analytics | 74 | 100 | 40 | 63 8,901 competing apps Median installs: 385 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| managing | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 51,217 competing apps Median installs: 651 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,351 major competitor apps |
| station | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 27,269 competing apps Median installs: 943 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 835 major competitor apps |
App Description
Companion for managing sessions from the Heel2Toe device.
Home Screen is the main landing page after login. It provides an at-a-glance overview of analytics and client information, including:
- A user or client profile card with an editable name and age.
- A Risk of Fall assessment card that calculates and displays fall-risk probability using heel-strike data and age.
- Key statistics such as total sessions and last session date.
- A Sessions per Week bar chart that visually tracks activity over time.
The app supports two distinct usage modes:
- Single-User Mode: for individual users.
- Multi-Client Clinic Mode: for healthcare providers managing multiple clients.
Switch modes directly from the Home Screen. In clinic mode, you can select an existing client from a dropdown, view filtered analytics, or add new clients. Client data (name and age) is now stored and managed in a secure Firestore sub-collection called clientsLocal for faster access and reliable synchronization.
Risk of Fall Analytics implements a logistic regression model that predicts fall-risk probability based on heel-strike data and client age. A dedicated Risk of Fall screen provides a detailed breakdown of the assessment and supports progress tracking over time.