Heel2Toe Docking Station
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 87 keywords for Heel2Toe Docking Station in Google Play
Heel2Toe Docking Station tracks 87 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 87 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 45.7.
Companion for managing sessions from the Heel2Toe device.
Tracked keywords
87
0 ranked • 87 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: managed
Avg difficulty
45.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.0
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 310
- 62.8
analytics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 118
- 61.5
glance
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 317
- 59.3
calculates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 126
Unranked opportunities
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 310
analytics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 168
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 118
glance
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 317
calculates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Competitors: 126
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 368,929 • Major competitors: 21,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
access
Total apps: 339,043 • Major competitors: 11,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
view
Total apps: 183,815 • Major competitors: 5,710
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
data
Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 368,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 21,444 major competitor apps |
| card | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 69,472 competing apps Median installs: 3,540 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,664 major competitor apps |
| page | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 28,299 competing apps Median installs: 2,819 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,479 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,207 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,822 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,239 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 60,399 competing apps Median installs: 797 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,080 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,741 competing apps Median installs: 3,150 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,178 major competitor apps |
| profile | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 38,936 competing apps Median installs: 872 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,600 major competitor apps |
| secure | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 106,277 competing apps Median installs: 754 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,226 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 53 | 74 41,428 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,301 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,316 competing apps Median installs: 1,103 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,380 major competitor apps |
| breakdown | 73 | 100 | 39 | 56 3,242 competing apps Median installs: 862 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 119 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,222 major competitor apps |
| tracking | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 68,818 competing apps Median installs: 363 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,561 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 53 | 81 128,193 competing apps Median installs: 867 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,054 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 339,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,013 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 11,559 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,262 competing apps Median installs: 658 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| managed | 74 | 100 | 41 | 64 10,495 competing apps Median installs: 1,196 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 310 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 28,546 competing apps Median installs: 1,092 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,050 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 183,815 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,710 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 165,742 competing apps Median installs: 1,224 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,954 major competitor apps |
| analytics | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 8,776 competing apps Median installs: 381 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| managing | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 52,399 competing apps Median installs: 585 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,282 major competitor apps |
| station | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 27,599 competing apps Median installs: 924 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 782 major competitor apps |
App Description
Companion for managing sessions from the Heel2Toe device.
Home Screen is the main landing page after login. It provides an at-a-glance overview of analytics and client information, including:
- A user or client profile card with an editable name and age.
- A Risk of Fall assessment card that calculates and displays fall-risk probability using heel-strike data and age.
- Key statistics such as total sessions and last session date.
- A Sessions per Week bar chart that visually tracks activity over time.
The app supports two distinct usage modes:
- Single-User Mode: for individual users.
- Multi-Client Clinic Mode: for healthcare providers managing multiple clients.
Switch modes directly from the Home Screen. In clinic mode, you can select an existing client from a dropdown, view filtered analytics, or add new clients. Client data (name and age) is now stored and managed in a secure Firestore sub-collection called clientsLocal for faster access and reliable synchronization.
Risk of Fall Analytics implements a logistic regression model that predicts fall-risk probability based on heel-strike data and client age. A dedicated Risk of Fall screen provides a detailed breakdown of the assessment and supports progress tracking over time.