Snakes & Ladders: Online Dice!
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 129 keywords for Snakes & Ladders: Online Dice! in Google Play
Snakes & Ladders: Online Dice! tracks 129 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 129 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 68.7, difficulty 49.6.
A Breath taking top Survival game is here with the Online Multiplayer Feature.
Tracked keywords
129
0 ranked • 129 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
68.7
Top keyword: race
Avg difficulty
49.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.3
race
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,034
- 67.6
problem
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 879
- 68.3
random
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,316
- 67.9
indian
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,349
- 68.0
behind
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,407
Unranked opportunities
race
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.7 • Competitors: 2,034
problem
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Competitors: 879
random
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 1,316
indian
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 1,349
behind
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Competitors: 1,407
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
play
Total apps: 113,236 • Major competitors: 19,366
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 67.3
simple
Total apps: 106,353 • Major competitors: 11,187
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
us
Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 65 | 100 | 67 | 86 113,236 competing apps Median installs: 62,750 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 19,366 major competitor apps |
| top | 68 | 100 | 65 | 80 46,866 competing apps Median installs: 46,978 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,127 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| multiplayer | 20 | 100 | 64 | 67 8,384 competing apps Median installs: 176,834 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 2,383 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| board | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,703 competing apps Median installs: 36,549 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,560 major competitor apps |
| survival | 67 | 100 | 53 | 66 7,725 competing apps Median installs: 107,305 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,607 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,918 major competitor apps | |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| interest | 72 | 100 | 57 | 70 12,516 competing apps Median installs: 40,690 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,436 major competitor apps |
| payment | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 29,462 competing apps Median installs: 30,186 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,270 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 64 | 71 15,037 competing apps Median installs: 30,161 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,552 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 60 | 81 51,898 competing apps Median installs: 37,300 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,276 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,446 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| journey | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 41,532 competing apps Median installs: 35,406 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,953 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 18,440 competing apps Median installs: 33,512 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,756 major competitor apps |
| services | 69 | 100 | 64 | 78 38,598 competing apps Median installs: 28,828 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,045 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 88,254 competing apps Median installs: 44,186 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 11,840 major competitor apps |
| race | 73 | 100 | 57 | 68 9,885 competing apps Median installs: 83,733 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,034 major competitor apps |
| today | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 35,039 competing apps Median installs: 28,691 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,372 major competitor apps |
| sort | 72 | 100 | 52 | 66 7,558 competing apps Median installs: 44,148 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 1,052 major competitor apps |
| navigate | 70 | 100 | 54 | 74 22,030 competing apps Median installs: 29,426 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,225 major competitor apps |
App Description
A Breath taking top Survival game is here with the Online Multiplayer Feature.
This Dice game is a simple race contest based on sheer luck and is popular with young kids. The historic version had root in morality lessons, where a player's progression up the board represented a life journey complicated by virtues (ladders) and vices (snakes).
The AI behind the Snakes and Ladder’s game is completely built by keeping-in-mind that the outcome of dice is always random and unpredictable whether it is thrown by the player or AI.
We have brought in a ground-up engine for dice throwing mechanics which will simulate the real-time dice throwing/flinging or tossing effect.
Online Multiplayer:
Google Play Game Services has been integrated into the ludo game, which means you can log in with Google Play app, or with your Google Plus account. Play with your friends, family or a random player. You have the option to see the invites from your friends, family, and anyone in your google plus circles.
History:
Snakes and Ladders originated in India as part of a family of dice board games. The game made its way to England and was sold as "Snakes and Ladders", then the basic concept was introduced in the United States as Chutes and Ladders (an "improved new version of England's famous indoor sport”) by game pioneer Milton Bradley in 1943.
The phrase "back to square one" originates in the game of snakes and ladders, or at least was influenced by it – the earliest attestation of the phrase refers to the game: "Withal he has the problem of maintaining the interest of the reader who is always being sent back to square one in a sort of intellectual game of snakes and ladders.
Note: Advertisements are strategically placed so you can have nondisruptive Gameplay.
Support and Feedback
If you have any technical problems (or) payment related questions please email us at support@hashcube.com