Reco Antifongiques AP-HP

Developer: Assistance Publique -

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

1.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

+17 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 28 keywords for Reco Antifongiques AP-HP in Google Play

Developer: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Category: medical

Reco Antifongiques AP-HP tracks 28 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 28 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 72.1, difficulty 40.5.

Recommendations on the proper use of antifungals

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 28 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

72.1

Top keyword: contribute

Avg difficulty

40.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

contribute

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 220
63.3
remain

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 468
63.0
replace

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 572
62.8
proper

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 484
64.0
damage

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 619
61.2

Unranked opportunities

contribute

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 220
remain

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 468
replace

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 572
proper

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 484
damage

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 619

High competition keywords

information

Total apps: 266,303 • Major competitors: 8,178

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
even

Total apps: 158,153 • Major competitors: 11,566

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
developed

Total apps: 51,775 • Major competitors: 1,372

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 46.3
direct

Total apps: 38,347 • Major competitors: 1,452

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.4
field

Total apps: 28,019 • Major competitors: 698

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
information	65	100	55	86 266,303 competing apps Median installs: 1,230 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	8,178 major competitor apps
initiative	73	100	34	56 3,199 competing apps Median installs: 1,680 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	81 major competitor apps
field	72	100	44	71 28,019 competing apps Median installs: 1,218 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	698 major competitor apps
specialists	73	100	35	57 3,811 competing apps Median installs: 1,346 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	103 major competitor apps
even	67	100	57	83 158,153 competing apps Median installs: 4,296 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	11,566 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	46	75 51,775 competing apps Median installs: 1,386 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,372 major competitor apps
contribute	74	100	48	63 9,333 competing apps Median installs: 1,166 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	220 major competitor apps
remain	74	100	40	63 8,961 competing apps Median installs: 2,754 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	468 major competitor apps
kind	72	100	46	70 23,477 competing apps Median installs: 4,282 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,593 major competitor apps
resulting	73	100	35	55 2,913 competing apps Median installs: 2,069 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	112 major competitor apps
direct	71	100	48	73 38,347 competing apps Median installs: 1,300 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,452 major competitor apps
replace	74	100	42	63 8,778 competing apps Median installs: 4,069 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	572 major competitor apps
recommendations	73	100	54	66 14,770 competing apps Median installs: 1,628 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	713 major competitor apps
responsible	73	100	42	67 15,132 competing apps Median installs: 3,064 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	771 major competitor apps
proper	74	100	40	64 10,446 competing apps Median installs: 2,579 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	484 major competitor apps
damage	74	100	41	61 6,901 competing apps Median installs: 4,252 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	619 major competitor apps
clinical	74	100	38	62 7,822 competing apps Median installs: 842 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	77 major competitor apps
copyright	72	100	42	69 22,459 competing apps Median installs: 4,875 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	648 major competitor apps
held	74	100	38	61 6,272 competing apps Median installs: 1,616 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	210 major competitor apps
decisions	73	100	42	68 18,770 competing apps Median installs: 919 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	603 major competitor apps
hp	71	100	37	48 1,082 competing apps Median installs: 3,335 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	76 major competitor apps
written	73	100	41	68 18,221 competing apps Median installs: 4,886 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	442 major competitor apps
validated	71	100	31	50 1,463 competing apps Median installs: 2,382 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	35 major competitor apps
medications	73	100	33	55 2,806 competing apps Median installs: 694 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	63 major competitor apps
practitioners	72	100	31	52 1,745 competing apps Median installs: 883 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	22 major competitor apps

App Description

Recommendations on the proper use of antifungals

These recommendations were developed at the initiative of COMAI AP-HP, to contribute to the proper use of antifungal medications by interns and AP-HP practitioners.
They have been written by specialists in the field and have been validated by the COMAI of AP-HP. They do not replace the clinical decisions of practitioners who remain responsible for their prescriptions in all circumstances.
AP-HP can not be held responsible for any direct or indirect damage of any kind resulting from the use, even partial, of the information of these recommendations. The AP-HP owns the copyright of these recommendations.