PI-Support
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 52 keywords for PI-Support in Google Play
PI-Support tracks 52 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 52 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 45.6.
App designed to lessen the workload of clinical research teams.
Tracked keywords
52
0 ranked • 52 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: patient
Avg difficulty
45.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 64.5
trial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 761
- 62.9
engagement
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 192
- 61.3
hospital
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 354
- 65.4
limit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,194
Unranked opportunities
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
trial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 761
engagement
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 192
hospital
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 354
limit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Competitors: 1,194
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
share
Total apps: 215,942 • Major competitors: 10,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
data
Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
support
Total apps: 169,442 • Major competitors: 7,314
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| share | 66 | 100 | 60 | 85 215,942 competing apps Median installs: 2,262 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,852 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 158,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,615 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,097 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 169,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,290 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,314 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 156,061 competing apps Median installs: 2,758 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 9,506 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,258 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 84,612 competing apps Median installs: 521 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,554 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,651 competing apps Median installs: 540 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,136 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,601 major competitor apps |
| trial | 74 | 100 | 45 | 65 11,228 competing apps Median installs: 6,182 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 761 major competitor apps |
| offering | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,474 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,892 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 64,956 competing apps Median installs: 2,853 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,079 major competitor apps |
| screen | 68 | 100 | 62 | 80 99,720 competing apps Median installs: 3,469 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,976 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 180,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,181 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,588 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 84,309 competing apps Median installs: 725 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,992 major competitor apps |
| engagement | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 8,932 competing apps Median installs: 522 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| platform | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 124,588 competing apps Median installs: 644 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 2,737 major competitor apps |
| select | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 99,496 competing apps Median installs: 2,334 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,606 major competitor apps |
| hospital | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 7,012 competing apps Median installs: 1,957 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 354 major competitor apps |
| locate | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 15,481 competing apps Median installs: 2,548 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 806 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,325 competing apps Median installs: 1,511 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 583 major competitor apps |
| referral | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,223 competing apps Median installs: 1,556 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 160 major competitor apps |
| integrated | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 35,494 competing apps Median installs: 881 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,085 major competitor apps |
| review | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 50,651 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,735 major competitor apps |
| office | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 23,999 competing apps Median installs: 1,259 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,005 major competitor apps |
App Description
App designed to lessen the workload of clinical research teams.
* save PIs and their site teams time and effort,
* support Junior Investigators and trainees,
* increase patient engagement and retention,
* limit screen failures,
* broaden study awareness,
* integrate local HCPs and
* improve data quality.
It largely achieves these goals by empowering PIs and maximizing their involvement. Specifically, it enables PIs to select and prioritize which study criteria they want displayed on their colleagues’ cell phones or mobile devices (making pre-screening in busy office clinics and/or hospital ward rounds much easier for all concerned); it extracts from study protocols the answers to common patient queries (obviating the need for PIs and Sub-Is to locate and review extensive study protocols); it helps to ensure the right patients are enrolled into the right trial by offering side-by-side comparisons of each competing trial; and increases study awareness by enabling site teams to share selected study information with their community-based referral networks. Finally, intra- and inter-site bulletin boards allow PIs and SCs to discuss their local and study-wide concerns/solutions with other site PIs and SCs, CRAs and study sponsors.
Overall, PI-Support can be used as a stand-alone tool or seamlessly integrated into existing CTMS to provide broad spectrum, site support.