EACS

Developer: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc.

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

12.6K installs

Ratings not yet available

577 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +13

Steady

Monthly +84

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 49 keywords for EACS in Google Play

Developer: Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc. Category: medical Rating: 2.61

EACS tracks 49 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 49 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.4, difficulty 41.9.

EACS Guidelines

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 49 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.4

Top keyword: promote

Avg difficulty

41.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

promote

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 355
65.7
assessment

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 118
61.2
society

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 109
61.4
profit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 274
62.1
reducing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 164
63.0

Unranked opportunities

promote

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 355
assessment

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 118
society

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 109
profit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 274
reducing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 164

High competition keywords

features

Total apps: 253,887 • Major competitors: 13,784

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
various

Total apps: 139,841 • Major competitors: 7,811

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
provide

Total apps: 136,849 • Major competitors: 4,403

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
full

Total apps: 129,647 • Major competitors: 6,741

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
management

Total apps: 111,277 • Major competitors: 2,440

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	69	100	50	77 69,675 competing apps Median installs: 648 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,824 major competitor apps
promote	74	100	41	66 13,336 competing apps Median installs: 744 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	355 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 111,277 competing apps Median installs: 490 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	2,440 major competitor apps
created	70	100	48	76 55,816 competing apps Median installs: 1,592 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,989 major competitor apps
include	71	100	48	72 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 2,136 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,289 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	52	82 136,849 competing apps Median installs: 1,367 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,403 major competitor apps
various	67	100	54	82 139,841 competing apps Median installs: 2,620 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,811 major competitor apps
mission	71	100	48	72 33,004 competing apps Median installs: 1,453 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,069 major competitor apps
healthcare	73	100	41	67 16,262 competing apps Median installs: 658 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	314 major competitor apps
tables	73	100	40	59 4,999 competing apps Median installs: 2,657 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	243 major competitor apps
text	69	100	59	78 77,552 competing apps Median installs: 3,276 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	4,281 major competitor apps
related	70	100	49	76 57,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,780 major competitor apps
professionals	72	100	43	71 27,406 competing apps Median installs: 431 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	375 major competitor apps
education	71	100	44	72 32,320 competing apps Median installs: 899 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	674 major competitor apps
across	69	100	64	78 83,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,631 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,203 major competitor apps
full	67	100	55	81 129,647 competing apps Median installs: 2,535 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	6,741 major competitor apps
features	66	100	59	86 253,887 competing apps Median installs: 2,163 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	13,784 major competitor apps
assessment	74	100	37	61 6,984 competing apps Median installs: 972 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	118 major competitor apps
healthcare professionals	72	100	32	54 2,307 competing apps Median installs: 467 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	27 major competitor apps
positive	73	100	43	68 19,412 competing apps Median installs: 1,222 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	574 major competitor apps
research	73	100	48	67 16,394 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	583 major competitor apps
society	74	100	37	61 7,158 competing apps Median installs: 684 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	109 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	46	75 51,614 competing apps Median installs: 1,099 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,245 major competitor apps
public	70	100	50	75 50,731 competing apps Median installs: 2,174 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,897 major competitor apps
disease	73	100	38	57 3,843 competing apps Median installs: 1,851 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	99 major competitor apps

App Description

EACS Guidelines

These Guidelines are developed by the European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS), a not-for-profit organization, whose mission is to promote excellence in standards of care, research and education in HIV-infection and related co-infections, and to actively engage in the formulation of public health policy, with the aim of reducing HIV disease burden across Europe.

The EACS Guidelines provide guidance for healthcare professionals on: assessment of HIV-positive persons, antiretroviral therapy (ART), prevention and management of co-morbidities, co-infections and opportunistic infections. EACS App features include full text search, user-created bookmarks and notes, various tables and more.