Cutting Optimizer

Developer: S.E.

Category: Tools

5.2K installs

ratings

+206 weekly installs

trend steady

+459 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 43 keywords for Cutting Optimizer in Google Play

Developer: S.E. Category: tools

Cutting Optimizer tracks 43 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 42 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.7, difficulty 49.5, best rank 19.

create an optimal cutting scheme for linear products (rebar, timber, cable etc.)

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 42 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 19 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.7

Top keyword: input

Avg difficulty

49.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

input

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 830
68.3
intuitive interface

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 472
63.5
professionals

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 466
66.9
saving

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,633
70.4
minimal

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 447
62.8

Unranked opportunities

input

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 830
intuitive interface

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 472
professionals

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 466
saving

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 1,633
minimal

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 447

High competition keywords

designed

Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
create

Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
start

Total apps: 88,254 • Major competitors: 11,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
perfect

Total apps: 81,756 • Major competitors: 10,774

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
save

Total apps: 75,490 • Major competitors: 9,726

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
cutting	71	100	43	57 2,314 competing apps Median installs: 48,817 Avg rating: 2.8	19	19	347 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	57	85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,110 major competitor apps
save	67	100	65	83 75,490 competing apps Median installs: 41,387 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	9,726 major competitor apps
intuitive	69	100	56	79 39,579 competing apps Median installs: 28,449 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	4,140 major competitor apps
width	69	100	35	49 689 competing apps Median installs: 40,506 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	87 major competitor apps
perfect	66	100	61	84 81,756 competing apps Median installs: 38,510 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	10,774 major competitor apps
account	68	100	60	79 41,533 competing apps Median installs: 33,567 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,686 major competitor apps
products	70	100	58	76 26,531 competing apps Median installs: 29,150 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,907 major competitor apps
efficient	71	100	54	72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,185 major competitor apps
start	66	100	62	85 88,254 competing apps Median installs: 44,186 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	11,840 major competitor apps
interface	68	100	52	79 41,743 competing apps Median installs: 24,264 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	3,368 major competitor apps
create	66	100	69	85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	13,574 major competitor apps
intuitive interface	72	100	43	64 5,215 competing apps Median installs: 25,310 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	472 major competitor apps
suitable	71	100	49	74 20,163 competing apps Median installs: 33,595 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,141 major competitor apps
professionals	72	100	43	67 8,269 competing apps Median installs: 17,969 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	466 major competitor apps
receive	68	100	57	81 56,666 competing apps Median installs: 28,494 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,489 major competitor apps
saving	72	100	52	70 13,263 competing apps Median installs: 38,092 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,633 major competitor apps
required	70	100	61	75 23,390 competing apps Median installs: 41,967 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,770 major competitor apps
minimal	72	100	45	63 4,761 competing apps Median installs: 25,156 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	447 major competitor apps
precise	72	100	52	67 8,611 competing apps Median installs: 36,414 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,101 major competitor apps
optimize	72	100	48	66 6,817 competing apps Median installs: 24,096 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	677 major competitor apps
ensure	70	100	59	76 27,894 competing apps Median installs: 27,644 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,884 major competitor apps
specify	71	100	37	57 2,243 competing apps Median installs: 27,127 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	178 major competitor apps
optimized	72	100	53	70 12,125 competing apps Median installs: 36,907 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,448 major competitor apps
friendly	68	100	54	81 53,552 competing apps Median installs: 26,394 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,890 major competitor apps

App Description

create an optimal cutting scheme for linear products (rebar, timber, cable etc.)

Cutting Optimizerr is a user-friendly and efficient application designed to optimize the cutting of materials such as boards, pipes, rebar, and other linear objects. It helps minimize waste, save materials, and save time.

With Cutting Optimizer, you can:
- Specify the dimensions and quantities of raw materials.
- Input the dimensions and quantities of required pieces.
- Account for cutting width to ensure precise calculations.
- Receive optimized cutting layouts with minimal leftovers.

This app is perfect for construction, manufacturing, and renovation projects. Its intuitive interface makes it suitable for both professionals and DIY enthusiasts.

Download Cutting Optimizer and start saving materials today!