ESC CHAT
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 77 keywords for ESC CHAT in Google Play
ESC CHAT tracks 77 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 77 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 51.8.
Ask your guideline-related question and ESC Chat will generate the answer
Tracked keywords
77
0 ranked • 77 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: relevant
Avg difficulty
51.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 790
- 69.3
source
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 959
- 66.4
transparent
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 501
- 70.2
powered
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 82.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,436
- 70.3
question
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 769
Unranked opportunities
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Competitors: 790
source
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 959
transparent
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 501
powered
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 82.1 • Competitors: 1,436
question
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 769
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
various
Total apps: 74,125 • Major competitors: 9,464
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
provides
Total apps: 71,787 • Major competitors: 6,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
full
Total apps: 67,878 • Major competitors: 8,324
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chat | 70 | 100 | 62 | 75 24,682 competing apps Median installs: 47,105 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,579 major competitor apps |
| art | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 21,686 competing apps Median installs: 37,108 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,077 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 52 | 69 11,396 competing apps Median installs: 27,566 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 959 major competitor apps |
| exclusive | 69 | 100 | 62 | 77 34,168 competing apps Median installs: 36,550 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,554 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 59 | 76 29,667 competing apps Median installs: 31,657 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,542 major competitor apps |
| transparent | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,740 competing apps Median installs: 12,454 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 501 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| enhance | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 30,373 competing apps Median installs: 33,880 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,622 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 64 | 71 15,037 competing apps Median installs: 30,161 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,552 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 70 | 100 | 53 | 55 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 19,557 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,206 competing apps Median installs: 32,062 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,931 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,302 competing apps Median installs: 26,107 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,820 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| powered | 72 | 100 | 82 | 70 12,785 competing apps Median installs: 29,315 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,436 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,793 major competitor apps |
| ask | 71 | 100 | 74 | 71 15,110 competing apps Median installs: 26,594 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,363 major competitor apps |
| ai | 71 | 100 | 72 | 73 19,033 competing apps Median installs: 39,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,628 major competitor apps |
| current | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 37,523 competing apps Median installs: 28,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,434 major competitor apps |
| question | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 13,032 competing apps Median installs: 23,094 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 769 major competitor apps |
| backed | 71 | 100 | 75 | 59 2,801 competing apps Median installs: 33,195 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 306 major competitor apps |
| continuously | 72 | 100 | 45 | 64 5,891 competing apps Median installs: 30,915 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| generate | 72 | 100 | 56 | 70 11,932 competing apps Median installs: 30,326 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,206 major competitor apps |
| companion | 71 | 100 | 50 | 71 15,187 competing apps Median installs: 20,502 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,041 major competitor apps |
App Description
Ask your guideline-related question and ESC Chat will generate the answer
Unlock instant, authoritative clinical insights
ESC Chat is the only ESC-endorsed AI tool designed to streamline your access to ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Built on state-of-the-art language modeling, it provides fast, accurate, and trustworthy answers to your guideline-related questions—backed by clear citations and direct links to the source.
Key Features
- Exclusive guideline-based responses: Powered solely by current ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines to ensure clinical reliability and evidence-based accuracy.
European Society of Cardiology
- Instant, personalized answers: Ask about diagnostic criteria, risk assessments, treatment pathways, or definitions—and receive precise responses with relevant guideline references and links.
European Society of Cardiology
- Contextual follow-up enabled: Refine or expand your question for deeper clarification or comparison across guidelines.
- Multilingual understanding, English responses: ESC Chat understands questions in various languages, though answers are provided in English.
- Transparent and traceable: Each answer includes source citations and links to the full guideline text—making it a reliable, time-saving tool for clinicians.
- ESC-backed and continuously evolving: As the only ESC-endorsed AI for clinical guidelines, it's built to enhance implementation of evidence-based practice—and your feedback helps it get better.