MICAS Mobile Agent

Developer: Sharp Electronics Corporation

Category: Productivity

6 installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 24 keywords for MICAS Mobile Agent in Google Play

Developer: Sharp Electronics Corporation - North Americas Category: productivity

MICAS Mobile Agent tracks 24 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 24 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.2, difficulty 53.6.

Collects Page count and Toner usage data

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 24 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.2

Top keyword: page

Avg difficulty

53.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

page

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,547
70.8
managed

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 385
62.7
print

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 562
64.5
usage

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,381
68.9
client

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 386
63.7

Unranked opportunities

page

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Competitors: 1,547
managed

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 385
print

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.6 • Competitors: 562
usage

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 1,381
client

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 386

High competition keywords

using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
allows

Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
data

Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
based

Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
page	72	100	52	71 13,904 competing apps Median installs: 37,180 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,547 major competitor apps
device	68	100	72	81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,390 major competitor apps
collect	69	100	58	78 37,582 competing apps Median installs: 51,160 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	5,908 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
quickly	68	100	69	80 51,305 competing apps Median installs: 33,814 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,661 major competitor apps
managed	72	100	43	63 4,652 competing apps Median installs: 25,508 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	385 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	58	84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	7,086 major competitor apps
print	72	100	53	65 5,992 competing apps Median installs: 28,108 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	562 major competitor apps
user	67	100	60	82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	4,926 major competitor apps
data	67	100	65	83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps
based	67	100	63	82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,592 major competitor apps
usage	72	100	51	69 10,725 competing apps Median installs: 47,412 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,381 major competitor apps
send	68	100	62	80 45,966 competing apps Median installs: 36,716 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,277 major competitor apps
client	72	100	43	64 5,327 competing apps Median installs: 21,646 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	386 major competitor apps
system	69	100	58	78 39,167 competing apps Median installs: 26,677 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,528 major competitor apps
agent	71	100	43	59 2,878 competing apps Median installs: 33,572 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	284 major competitor apps
locations	72	100	50	69 11,569 competing apps Median installs: 38,872 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	1,577 major competitor apps
count	72	100	57	64 5,412 competing apps Median installs: 33,925 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	636 major competitor apps
require	72	100	58	71 13,548 competing apps Median installs: 36,082 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,571 major competitor apps
system using	67	100	24	38 164 competing apps Median installs: 23,117 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	13 major competitor apps
collects	70	100	58	56 1,922 competing apps Median installs: 31,158 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	198 major competitor apps
counts	70	100	36	55 1,638 competing apps Median installs: 29,352 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	156 major competitor apps
usage data	67	100	29	38 160 competing apps Median installs: 41,700 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	13 major competitor apps

App Description

Collects Page count and Toner usage data

At locations where the managed device count is too few to require a PC-based MICAS Agent, the MICAS Mobile Agent allows a client end-user to quickly collect and send print counts and toner usage data to the MICAS system using their mobile device.