MICAS Mobile Agent

Developer: Sharp Electronics Corporation

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

7.00 installs

Ratings not yet available

MAU not available

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 24 keywords for MICAS Mobile Agent in Google Play

Developer: Sharp Electronics Corporation - North Americas Category: productivity Rating: 2.65

MICAS Mobile Agent tracks 24 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 24 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 48.8.

Collects Page count and Toner usage data

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 24 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: managed

Avg difficulty

48.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

managed

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 315
64.1
print

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 542
65.4
agent

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 286
61.9
count

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 627
66.0
client

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 390
67.4

Unranked opportunities

managed

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 315
print

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 542
agent

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 286
count

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.9 • Competitors: 627
client

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 390

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
using

Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
data

Total apps: 180,122 • Major competitors: 6,588

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
allows

Total apps: 178,103 • Major competitors: 5,820

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
based

Total apps: 152,689 • Major competitors: 5,418

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
page	72	100	48	71 28,233 competing apps Median installs: 2,833 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,478 major competitor apps
device	68	100	63	80 107,472 competing apps Median installs: 2,652 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	6,156 major competitor apps
collect	69	100	54	78 77,178 competing apps Median installs: 3,500 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,811 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	11,093 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	10,258 major competitor apps
quickly	68	100	59	81 116,979 competing apps Median installs: 1,204 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,642 major competitor apps
managed	74	100	41	64 10,530 competing apps Median installs: 1,197 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	315 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	54	84 178,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,251 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,820 major competitor apps
print	74	100	47	65 12,776 competing apps Median installs: 2,235 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	542 major competitor apps
user	67	100	56	82 143,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	5,128 major competitor apps
data	67	100	58	84 180,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,181 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	6,588 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,689 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,418 major competitor apps
usage	72	100	47	69 21,815 competing apps Median installs: 3,256 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,392 major competitor apps
send	68	100	56	79 95,139 competing apps Median installs: 2,301 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	5,136 major competitor apps
client	73	100	42	67 17,044 competing apps Median installs: 486 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	390 major competitor apps
system	68	100	53	80 100,543 competing apps Median installs: 1,256 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	3,584 major competitor apps
agent	74	100	40	62 7,686 competing apps Median installs: 1,224 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	286 major competitor apps
locations	72	100	46	69 21,409 competing apps Median installs: 2,970 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,354 major competitor apps
count	74	100	49	66 13,946 competing apps Median installs: 1,156 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	627 major competitor apps
require	72	100	51	70 25,208 competing apps Median installs: 2,958 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,300 major competitor apps
system using	70	100	25	42 434 competing apps Median installs: 941 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	9 major competitor apps
collects	73	100	49	57 3,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,586 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	157 major competitor apps
counts	73	100	36	57 3,989 competing apps Median installs: 1,066 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	128 major competitor apps
usage data	70	100	27	42 459 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps

App Description

Collects Page count and Toner usage data

At locations where the managed device count is too few to require a PC-based MICAS Agent, the MICAS Mobile Agent allows a client end-user to quickly collect and send print counts and toner usage data to the MICAS system using their mobile device.