MICAS Mobile Agent

Developer: Sharp Electronics Corporation

Category: Productivity

Add App to Comparison

7.00 installs

ratings

+1.00 weekly installs

trend steady

+1.00 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 24 keywords for MICAS Mobile Agent in Google Play

Developer: Sharp Electronics Corporation - North Americas Category: productivity

MICAS Mobile Agent tracks 24 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 24 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 47.9.

Collects Page count and Toner usage data

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 24 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: managed

Avg difficulty

47.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

managed

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 353
64.2
print

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 582
65.4
agent

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 306
61.9
count

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 676
66.0
client

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 400
67.4

Unranked opportunities

managed

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 353
print

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 582
agent

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 306
count

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Competitors: 676
client

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 400

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 279,983 • Major competitors: 11,022

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
using

Total apps: 224,820 • Major competitors: 12,395

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
allows

Total apps: 179,160 • Major competitors: 6,609

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
data

Total apps: 176,649 • Major competitors: 7,048

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
based

Total apps: 154,227 • Major competitors: 5,998

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
page	72	100	47	71 27,962 competing apps Median installs: 3,620 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,603 major competitor apps
device	68	100	60	80 106,083 competing apps Median installs: 3,387 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	6,727 major competitor apps
collect	69	100	53	78 75,991 competing apps Median installs: 3,920 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,237 major competitor apps
using	66	100	57	85 224,820 competing apps Median installs: 2,847 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	12,395 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 279,983 competing apps Median installs: 1,396 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	11,022 major competitor apps
quickly	68	100	57	81 120,166 competing apps Median installs: 1,283 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,254 major competitor apps
managed	74	100	41	64 10,608 competing apps Median installs: 1,372 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	353 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	53	84 179,160 competing apps Median installs: 1,437 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	6,609 major competitor apps
print	74	100	46	65 12,639 competing apps Median installs: 2,628 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	582 major competitor apps
user	67	100	54	82 139,859 competing apps Median installs: 2,005 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	5,526 major competitor apps
data	67	100	57	84 176,649 competing apps Median installs: 1,354 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	7,048 major competitor apps
based	67	100	55	83 154,227 competing apps Median installs: 1,418 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,998 major competitor apps
usage	72	100	46	69 21,408 competing apps Median installs: 4,275 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,490 major competitor apps
send	68	100	55	79 94,245 competing apps Median installs: 2,969 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	5,494 major competitor apps
client	73	100	42	67 16,844 competing apps Median installs: 568 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	400 major competitor apps
system	68	100	52	80 98,869 competing apps Median installs: 1,408 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	3,809 major competitor apps
agent	74	100	40	62 7,595 competing apps Median installs: 1,032 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	306 major competitor apps
locations	72	100	46	69 21,624 competing apps Median installs: 3,514 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,492 major competitor apps
count	74	100	47	66 13,732 competing apps Median installs: 1,195 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	676 major competitor apps
require	72	100	50	70 25,406 competing apps Median installs: 3,512 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,445 major competitor apps
system using	70	100	26	42 437 competing apps Median installs: 1,050 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	9 major competitor apps
collects	73	100	46	57 4,003 competing apps Median installs: 1,846 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	168 major competitor apps
counts	73	100	36	57 4,033 competing apps Median installs: 1,142 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	143 major competitor apps
usage data	70	100	28	43 463 competing apps Median installs: 263 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	12 major competitor apps

App Description

Collects Page count and Toner usage data

At locations where the managed device count is too few to require a PC-based MICAS Agent, the MICAS Mobile Agent allows a client end-user to quickly collect and send print counts and toner usage data to the MICAS system using their mobile device.