SICK Safety Assistant
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 98 keywords for SICK Safety Assistant in Google Play
SICK Safety Assistant tracks 98 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 97 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.1, difficulty 42.9, best rank 15.
Read configuration and diagnosis data from SICK safety sensors via NFC.
Tracked keywords
98
1 ranked • 97 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 15 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: innovation
Avg difficulty
42.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.5
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 186
- 64.5
flexibility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 486
- 62.1
error
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 378
- 61.6
supply
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 237
- 65.3
entry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 340
Unranked opportunities
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 186
flexibility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 486
error
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 378
supply
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 237
entry
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 340
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 376,268 • Major competitors: 24,058
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
access
Total apps: 331,798 • Major competitors: 12,273
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
without
Total apps: 214,890 • Major competitors: 11,650
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
data
Total apps: 175,427 • Major competitors: 7,022
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
check
Total apps: 133,266 • Major competitors: 7,462
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| safety | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 36,123 competing apps Median installs: 1,095 Avg rating: 2.2 | 15 | 15 | 1,329 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 376,268 competing apps Median installs: 2,970 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 24,058 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 104,155 competing apps Median installs: 2,572 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 6,853 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 105,602 competing apps Median installs: 3,420 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,704 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 117,628 competing apps Median installs: 1,772 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,704 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,206 competing apps Median installs: 604 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| flexibility | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 11,120 competing apps Median installs: 928 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 486 major competitor apps |
| modern | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 74,441 competing apps Median installs: 1,194 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,445 major competitor apps |
| offer | 69 | 100 | 51 | 79 86,409 competing apps Median installs: 1,275 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,768 major competitor apps |
| lock | 72 | 100 | 51 | 71 27,835 competing apps Median installs: 6,385 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,025 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 125,887 competing apps Median installs: 2,993 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,786 major competitor apps |
| combine | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 15,954 competing apps Median installs: 4,532 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,354 major competitor apps |
| error | 74 | 100 | 40 | 62 7,822 competing apps Median installs: 5,844 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| supply | 74 | 100 | 39 | 62 7,296 competing apps Median installs: 1,043 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 237 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 331,798 competing apps Median installs: 1,161 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,273 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 43 | 57 3,751 competing apps Median installs: 1,910 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 82,540 competing apps Median installs: 743 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,117 major competitor apps |
| fast | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 125,800 competing apps Median installs: 2,728 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,391 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 87,415 competing apps Median installs: 1,706 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,589 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 68,357 competing apps Median installs: 1,793 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,251 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 42,958 competing apps Median installs: 3,106 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,256 major competitor apps |
| completely | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 46,702 competing apps Median installs: 4,676 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,864 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 214,890 competing apps Median installs: 3,424 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,650 major competitor apps |
| check | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 133,266 competing apps Median installs: 2,162 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,462 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 53,985 competing apps Median installs: 1,996 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,908 major competitor apps |
App Description
Read configuration and diagnosis data from SICK safety sensors via NFC.
Supported products
deTec4 safety light curtains: www.sick.com/deTec
The new generation of safety light curtains deTec are suitable for safeguarding hazardous areas, access points and danger points. Intelligent and modern technologies such as NFC and IO-Link offer completely new possibilities for comprehensive diagnostics, fast commissioning, and adoption of automation functions.
• deTec4
• deTec4 HG
• deTec4 Ex II 3GD
deTem A/P multiple light beam safety devices: www.sick.com/deTem
The deTem A/P multiple light beam safety devices are active/passive systems in a compact housing and offer a high degree of flexibility for access protection and entry and exit monitoring (muting).
• deTem4 A/P
• deTem4 Core A/P
• deTem2 Core A/P
• deTem4 LT Muting A/P
Secure multi-beam scanners scanGrid2: www.sick.com/scanGrid
Safe multi-beam scanners from SICK combine the advantages of a safety light curtain with those of a safety laser scanner. Thanks to safe solid-state technology of the LiDAR sensors, transmitter and receiver units are compactly integrated in one device without moving parts. The result: innovation in a new dimension.
• scanGrid2 CANopen
• scanGrid2 I/O
Report
Resolution, protective field height, level of supply voltage, OSSD state, error messages, troubleshooting
Configuration
Details of current configuration, safety check sum
Technical data
Type code, part number, safety check sum
Error history
Details of the last lock outs
Switch-off analysis
Details of the last switch-offs (not lock outs)
Beam status
Signal strength in fourfold graduation: Very strong, strong, weak, no
DIP switch assistant
DIP switch positions comply with desired configuration
Dashboard
Overview of last reports
Do you have any ideas or comments? We look forward to your feedback