SICK Safety Assistant
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 98 keywords for SICK Safety Assistant in Google Play
SICK Safety Assistant tracks 98 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 97 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.8, difficulty 47.4, best rank 15.
Read configuration and diagnosis data from SICK safety sensors via NFC.
Tracked keywords
98
1 ranked • 97 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 15 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: field
Avg difficulty
47.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 67.7
moving
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,058
- 67.5
protection
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,237
- 67.5
technical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 694
- 70.3
safety
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank 15
Competitors: 1,232
Unranked opportunities
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
moving
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Competitors: 1,058
protection
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 1,237
technical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 694
combine
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.7 • Competitors: 1,471
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
check
Total apps: 60,031 • Major competitors: 7,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| safety | 72 | 100 | 63 | 70 13,052 competing apps Median installs: 21,160 Avg rating: 2.6 | 15 | 15 | 1,232 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 72 | 81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,390 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 71 | 100 | 37 | 57 2,237 competing apps Median installs: 19,792 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 171 major competitor apps |
| flexibility | 71 | 100 | 43 | 62 4,120 competing apps Median installs: 28,476 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| modern | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 27,345 competing apps Median installs: 33,314 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,186 major competitor apps |
| offer | 69 | 100 | 57 | 77 34,258 competing apps Median installs: 30,128 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,586 major competitor apps |
| lock | 71 | 100 | 57 | 72 15,690 competing apps Median installs: 37,368 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,917 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| combine | 72 | 100 | 51 | 67 8,726 competing apps Median installs: 57,555 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,471 major competitor apps |
| error | 72 | 100 | 42 | 62 4,512 competing apps Median installs: 31,886 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
| supply | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,775 competing apps Median installs: 25,252 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 234 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 70 | 100 | 53 | 55 1,622 competing apps Median installs: 19,557 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 27,977 competing apps Median installs: 22,814 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,001 major competitor apps |
| fast | 68 | 100 | 61 | 81 56,216 competing apps Median installs: 44,906 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,690 major competitor apps |
| current | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 37,523 competing apps Median installs: 28,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,434 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 31,519 competing apps Median installs: 30,635 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,488 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 20,163 competing apps Median installs: 33,595 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| completely | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 25,933 competing apps Median installs: 41,029 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,060 major competitor apps |
| without | 65 | 100 | 63 | 86 113,596 competing apps Median installs: 37,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 12,654 major competitor apps |
| check | 67 | 100 | 65 | 82 60,031 competing apps Median installs: 36,479 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 7,081 major competitor apps |
| devices | 70 | 100 | 67 | 75 25,598 competing apps Median installs: 36,807 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,146 major competitor apps |
App Description
Read configuration and diagnosis data from SICK safety sensors via NFC.
Supported products
deTec4 safety light curtains: www.sick.com/deTec
The new generation of safety light curtains deTec are suitable for safeguarding hazardous areas, access points and danger points. Intelligent and modern technologies such as NFC and IO-Link offer completely new possibilities for comprehensive diagnostics, fast commissioning, and adoption of automation functions.
• deTec4
• deTec4 HG
• deTec4 Ex II 3GD
deTem A/P multiple light beam safety devices: www.sick.com/deTem
The deTem A/P multiple light beam safety devices are active/passive systems in a compact housing and offer a high degree of flexibility for access protection and entry and exit monitoring (muting).
• deTem4 A/P
• deTem4 Core A/P
• deTem2 Core A/P
• deTem4 LT Muting A/P
Secure multi-beam scanners scanGrid2: www.sick.com/scanGrid
Safe multi-beam scanners from SICK combine the advantages of a safety light curtain with those of a safety laser scanner. Thanks to safe solid-state technology of the LiDAR sensors, transmitter and receiver units are compactly integrated in one device without moving parts. The result: innovation in a new dimension.
• scanGrid2 CANopen
• scanGrid2 I/O
Report
Resolution, protective field height, level of supply voltage, OSSD state, error messages, troubleshooting
Configuration
Details of current configuration, safety check sum
Technical data
Type code, part number, safety check sum
Error history
Details of the last lock outs
Switch-off analysis
Details of the last switch-offs (not lock outs)
Beam status
Signal strength in fourfold graduation: Very strong, strong, weak, no
DIP switch assistant
DIP switch positions comply with desired configuration
Dashboard
Overview of last reports
Do you have any ideas or comments? We look forward to your feedback