SnapCalorie AI Calorie Counter
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 158 keywords for SnapCalorie AI Calorie Counter in Google Play
SnapCalorie AI Calorie Counter tracks 158 keywords (4 keywords rank; 154 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.8, difficulty 48.6, best rank 75.
Photo Diary & Macro Tracker
Tracked keywords
158
4 ranked • 154 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 75 • Latest leader 111
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: depth
Avg difficulty
48.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
depth
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank 111
Competitors: 899
- 68.1
collected
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 688
- 68.4
anything
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,521
- 68.6
phones
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,219
- 70.9
value
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank 169
Competitors: 1,328
Unranked opportunities
collected
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 688
anything
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.2 • Competitors: 1,521
phones
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,219
volume
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Competitors: 1,088
error
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 372
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
features
Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| portion | 71 | 100 | 42 | 58 2,420 competing apps Median installs: 28,382 Avg rating: 3.2 | 76 | 75 | 224 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 19,904 competing apps Median installs: 36,597 Avg rating: 2.9 | 77 | 77 | 2,266 major competitor apps |
| depth | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 9,732 competing apps Median installs: 28,270 Avg rating: 3.1 | 111 | 111 | 899 major competitor apps |
| value | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 14,016 competing apps Median installs: 30,256 Avg rating: 2.8 | 169 | 169 | 1,328 major competitor apps |
| challenging | 70 | 100 | 57 | 76 27,379 competing apps Median installs: 61,738 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,888 major competitor apps |
| voice notes | 68 | 100 | 45 | 44 363 competing apps Median installs: 49,234 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| calorie counter | 68 | 100 | 33 | 42 291 competing apps Median installs: 67,167 Avg rating: 3.4 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 37,575 competing apps Median installs: 32,284 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,364 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| sensor | 71 | 100 | 40 | 59 2,831 competing apps Median installs: 31,787 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 319 major competitor apps |
| scan | 71 | 100 | 65 | 71 14,906 competing apps Median installs: 42,340 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,192 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,369 competing apps Median installs: 33,095 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,197 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| food | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 19,500 competing apps Median installs: 26,500 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,206 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| dish | 70 | 100 | 37 | 54 1,427 competing apps Median installs: 32,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 156 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| note | 71 | 100 | 53 | 72 16,600 competing apps Median installs: 34,914 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,579 major competitor apps |
| collected | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 9,686 competing apps Median installs: 25,493 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 688 major competitor apps |
| volume | 72 | 100 | 55 | 66 7,437 competing apps Median installs: 46,520 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 58 | 74 20,076 competing apps Median installs: 43,590 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,597 major competitor apps |
App Description
Photo Diary & Macro Tracker
Do you only track calories?
No! We track all macronutrients and over 100 micronutrients. SnapCalorie's AI nutritionist can help you achieve a diverse set of dietary goals.
How accurate is it?
Our photo calorie counter is approximately twice as accurate as visually estimating portion sizes.
Our voice note algorithm is as accurate as the information you give it. Dictating gram values and ingredients as you place items on a food scale allows you to log your food with laboratory-grade precision and NO TYPING.
Don’t want to use a kitchen scale?
Our photo calorie counter can scan the exact volume of your food with the LiDAR depth sensor on your iPhone Pro or our voice note feature can assume average portion sizes if not specified.
How do you measure accuracy?
We were founded by a team of ex-Google AI researchers who co-founded Google Lens and Cloud Vision API. Our AI algorithm is the only one backed by peer-reviewed academic research. In our research, Nutrition5k, we collected a test dataset of 5,000 unique dishes, weighing every ingredient that went onto the plate. To evaluate our algorithm's accuracy, we ran the photo calorie counter on this dataset and compared the results to the true nutrient values.
Average expected error for a 500 calorie dish is +/- 80 calories on an iPhone Pro and +/- 130 on a regular iPhone. By comparison users eyeballing portion size visually were +/- 265 calories on average.
How does it work?
Snap a picture with the photo calorie counter and our AI starts by identifying the different types of food and where they are on the dish, like a nutritionist would. Next, if you have an iPhone Pro, we measure the food's volume with the LiDAR depth sensor. Our AI estimates portion size visually for phones without a depth sensor. Finally, we look up the nutritional values for that type of food and portion size in a trusted database (e.g., USDA) and sum up the totals for you!
If anything looks incorrect, you can fix it yourself OR send it back to our team of nutrition experts for review.
Over time, our photo calorie counter fine-tunes itself based on your specific data, learning from the corrections you make. Always eat meat alternative burgers? Our AI algorithm will slowly learn and adapt to you.
What about cooking fats and oils?
Cooking fats are challenging for anyone counting calories, and our algorithm is no exception. You can add voice notes to hint at the cooking method used or just adjust cooking fats after the initial prediction.
What if something is missing from your barcode database?
One of our favorite features is the ability to take a photo of a nutrition label. Our AI will type in all the values for you in seconds!
Terms: https://www.snapcalorie.com/terms/