HydroCrowd
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 96 keywords for HydroCrowd in Google Play
HydroCrowd tracks 96 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 96 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 44.8.
HydroCrowd is a hydrological participatory monitoring project by JLU Giessen.
Tracked keywords
96
0 ranked • 96 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: automated
Avg difficulty
44.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
automated
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 261
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 65.3
reporting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 260
- 61.3
tested
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 406
- 66.1
impact
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 507
Unranked opportunities
automated
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 261
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
reporting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 260
tested
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 406
impact
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 507
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 332,448 • Major competitors: 15,780
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
easy
Total apps: 328,697 • Major competitors: 14,659
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
using
Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
create
Total apps: 200,665 • Major competitors: 13,287
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
different
Total apps: 187,171 • Major competitors: 13,720
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 332,448 competing apps Median installs: 1,713 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 15,780 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 108,633 competing apps Median installs: 1,962 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,418 major competitor apps |
| weather | 72 | 100 | 57 | 70 23,535 competing apps Median installs: 2,569 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,432 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 328,697 competing apps Median installs: 1,993 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 14,659 major competitor apps |
| collect | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 77,178 competing apps Median installs: 3,500 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,811 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| events | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 79,388 competing apps Median installs: 628 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,015 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 29,149 competing apps Median installs: 3,971 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,842 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,093 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,101 competing apps Median installs: 2,143 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,302 major competitor apps |
| program | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 43,195 competing apps Median installs: 1,483 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,234 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,113 competing apps Median installs: 1,534 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| collected | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,857 competing apps Median installs: 2,838 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 561 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,461 competing apps Median installs: 2,011 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 62 | 84 200,665 competing apps Median installs: 2,550 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 13,287 major competitor apps |
| engaging | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 51,410 competing apps Median installs: 1,558 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,583 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 182,573 competing apps Median installs: 807 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,701 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 166,176 competing apps Median installs: 1,227 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,004 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,952 competing apps Median installs: 1,681 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,411 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,882 competing apps Median installs: 1,642 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,509 major competitor apps |
| approach | 73 | 100 | 48 | 68 18,877 competing apps Median installs: 816 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| participate | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 22,336 competing apps Median installs: 1,146 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 986 major competitor apps |
| stations | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 19,590 competing apps Median installs: 1,812 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| map | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 41,537 competing apps Median installs: 2,724 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,369 major competitor apps |
App Description
HydroCrowd is a hydrological participatory monitoring project by JLU Giessen.
The project will test different approaches to engaging volunteers by implementing and evaluating a participatory hydro-climatic monitoring program in selected mountain regions in Ecuador, Honduras, and Tanzania. Furthermore, it will demonstrate how the data collected by the volunteers can be used in hydrological modeling and, therefore, improve the prediction of climate change's impact on water resources in data-scarce regions. The project outputs can be used to guide the development of future participatory monitoring programs and stimulate upscaling of the approach to other regions to address the lack of hydro-climatic data for evidence-based decision-making and sustainable water management.
Volunteers participate by reporting measurements from easy-to-use instruments at weather and water stations installed in the project areas in Ecuador, Honduras, and Tanzania. These measurements include rainfall, air temperature, humidity, and the water level and turbidity of rivers and streams. To evaluate the quality of the data, the data will be compared with automated reference measurements at selected sites. These are then systematically examined and tested for their suitability for modeling. This app enables easy submission of data by the volunteers and provides instructions on how to collect data. Furthermore, users can view the data previously submitted by other volunteers. As the remote study areas have limited network access, it is recommended to download the map of your region and the locations of the stations before going to any of the HydroCrowd stations.
In addition to reporting measurements from the HydroCrowd stations, volunteers can create spots to record their own rainfall data and report weather events using ‘photo notes.’
