TRAX Analytics

Developer: TRAX Analytics

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

836 installs

9.00 ratings

42 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +2.00

Steady

Monthly +9.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 50 keywords for TRAX Analytics in Google Play

Developer: TRAX Analytics Category: tools Rating: 3.78

TRAX Analytics tracks 50 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 50 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 45.5.

Utilizing technology to improve custodial operations and facility management

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.7

Top keyword: facility

Avg difficulty

45.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

facility

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 233
63.7
inventory

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 272
65.3
notify

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 394
62.7
alert

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 650
66.2
cleaning

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 541
62.9

Unranked opportunities

facility

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 233
inventory

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 272
notify

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Competitors: 394
alert

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 650
cleaning

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.0 • Competitors: 541

High competition keywords

manage

Total apps: 186,393 • Major competitors: 6,769

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
allows

Total apps: 177,540 • Major competitors: 5,758

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
complete

Total apps: 169,259 • Major competitors: 8,813

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
see

Total apps: 164,574 • Major competitors: 7,501

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
based

Total apps: 151,846 • Major competitors: 5,339

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
used	68	100	55	81 116,056 competing apps Median installs: 2,382 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,638 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 111,297 competing apps Median installs: 491 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	2,444 major competitor apps
manage	66	100	56	84 186,393 competing apps Median installs: 652 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	6,769 major competitor apps
working	70	100	51	74 43,005 competing apps Median installs: 1,426 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,671 major competitor apps
including	67	100	57	81 129,371 competing apps Median installs: 2,104 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	6,930 major competitor apps
task	72	100	52	69 22,396 competing apps Median installs: 1,218 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,075 major competitor apps
complete	67	100	54	83 169,259 competing apps Median installs: 2,113 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	8,813 major competitor apps
notification	70	100	49	74 44,172 competing apps Median installs: 1,265 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,900 major competitor apps
improve	68	100	52	80 99,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,632 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,452 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	53	84 177,540 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,758 major competitor apps
see	67	100	60	83 164,574 competing apps Median installs: 1,695 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,501 major competitor apps
work	68	100	56	81 122,001 competing apps Median installs: 1,546 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,897 major competitor apps
operations	73	100	44	68 19,874 competing apps Median installs: 439 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	472 major competitor apps
location	69	100	54	77 69,624 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,982 major competitor apps
inventory	74	100	40	65 12,535 competing apps Median installs: 340 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	272 major competitor apps
receive	67	100	53	82 144,323 competing apps Median installs: 831 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,295 major competitor apps
facility	75	100	39	64 10,018 competing apps Median installs: 768 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	233 major competitor apps
enter	70	100	49	75 51,858 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,434 major competitor apps
tasks	72	100	49	71 29,511 competing apps Median installs: 1,193 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,464 major competitor apps
go	68	100	59	80 101,673 competing apps Median installs: 2,584 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,968 major competitor apps
perform	72	100	47	70 26,230 competing apps Median installs: 3,034 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,692 major competitor apps
notify	74	100	59	63 8,678 competing apps Median installs: 1,943 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	394 major competitor apps
background	70	100	51	76 58,867 competing apps Median installs: 3,496 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,430 major competitor apps
allow	70	100	50	75 48,111 competing apps Median installs: 2,086 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,159 major competitor apps
alert	74	100	42	66 14,347 competing apps Median installs: 1,444 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	650 major competitor apps

App Description

Utilizing technology to improve custodial operations and facility management

The purpose of this app is to notify Custodial staff of the Cleaning Alert and allow them to manage task which has performed and inventory used during the janitorial operations for the location.

The brief working of the application is as below:

1. Custodial staff will receive the notification including the details about the location to clean.
2. Custodial Worker will accept the work.
3. Custodial Worker will go to the cleaning area.
4. Custodial Worker will be able to see the tasks to perform based on the location they are in.
5. Custodial Worker will be able to enter the inventory used during the cleaning work.
6. Custodial Worker will be able to complete the Cleaning Work Order.

This app also allows custodial staff to perform QC and Inspection for a location.

Warning: Continued use of GPS running in the background can dramatically decrease battery life.