Charging Master
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 121 keywords for Charging Master in Google Play
Charging Master tracks 121 keywords (7 keywords rank; 114 need traction). Key metrics: 57% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.1, difficulty 45.1, best rank 1.
Professional charging application
Tracked keywords
121
7 ranked • 114 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
57%
Best rank 1 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: normal
Avg difficulty
45.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
normal
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 623
- 62.7
charging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank 2
Competitors: 318
- 60.3
charges
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank 2
Competitors: 393
- 62.2
charged
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank 142
Competitors: 559
- 65.1
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 503
Unranked opportunities
normal
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 623
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 503
notify
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 59.4 • Competitors: 395
loss
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 603
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 447
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
mobile
Total apps: 280,792 • Major competitors: 10,253
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
way
Total apps: 206,164 • Major competitors: 10,421
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
phone
Total apps: 152,369 • Major competitors: 8,545
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| charging | 74 | 100 | 40 | 63 8,614 competing apps Median installs: 1,499 Avg rating: 1.8 | 2 | 1 | 318 major competitor apps |
| charger | 72 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,825 competing apps Median installs: 2,404 Avg rating: 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 84 major competitor apps |
| charges | 74 | 100 | 45 | 60 6,131 competing apps Median installs: 3,541 Avg rating: 2.1 | 2 | 2 | 393 major competitor apps |
| charge | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 19,202 competing apps Median installs: 2,761 Avg rating: 2.1 | 5 | 5 | 1,063 major competitor apps |
| decrease battery | 71 | 100 | 32 | 50 1,393 competing apps Median installs: 1,379 Avg rating: 1.9 | 13 | 13 | 37 major competitor apps |
| battery life | 72 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,833 competing apps Median installs: 1,108 Avg rating: 1.9 | 22 | 22 | 63 major competitor apps |
| charged | 74 | 100 | 45 | 62 8,067 competing apps Median installs: 5,218 Avg rating: 2.4 | 142 | 141 | 559 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 79,784 competing apps Median installs: 5,732 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,164 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 62 | 83 152,369 competing apps Median installs: 2,624 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,545 major competitor apps |
| handle | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 18,072 competing apps Median installs: 1,235 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,002 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,207 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,822 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 206,164 competing apps Median installs: 1,630 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 10,421 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 34,651 competing apps Median installs: 2,253 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,943 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,792 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,253 major competitor apps |
| pay | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 71,257 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,833 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,737 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,510 competing apps Median installs: 3,897 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,369 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,188 competing apps Median installs: 2,988 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 64,057 competing apps Median installs: 519 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,639 major competitor apps |
| effective | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 37,727 competing apps Median installs: 921 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,135 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,486 competing apps Median installs: 1,961 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,797 major competitor apps |
| playing | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 56,874 competing apps Median installs: 8,876 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,877 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 89,363 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,413 major competitor apps |
App Description
Professional charging application
There are two ways to charge faster:
The first is to use a higher power AC charger and avoid using USB charging because the current is too low;
The second is to reduce the power consumption and load of the phone as much as possible during the charging process to reduce the loss of electricity. If the electricity consumption can be reduced, the phone can be charged faster. For example, under normal circumstances, the phone can be charged for 1000mAh in an hour. But if the phone is continuously under high load, such as playing games, watching HD videos or turning on the flashlight, it may consume 300mAh in one hour. In this case, only 700mAh can be charged in one hour. However, if the electricity consumption can be reduced to 100mAh, the phone can be charged for 900mAh in one hour. This means that the charging speed indirectly increased by nearly 30%.
Explanation of the function description:
☆ Try to stop the work of your own background thread when charging.
During charging, avoid running background threads to reduce power consumption.
☆ Reduce screen brightness, reduce power consumption and reduce power consumption.
The screen LED is one of the main factors that consumes electricity, and reducing the screen brightness is a very effective way to reduce energy loss.
☆ Notify users to deal with abnormal power consumption increase in a short time.
If the electricity consumption speed increases in a short period of time, it indicates that there may be non-normal CPU loads. Users need to be reminded to handle them.
☆ Optimize WiFi, GPS, Bluetooth and other system settings to reduce mobile phone consumption.
Suggest that users turn off power-consuming devices such as WiFi, GPS, Bluetooth, and automatic sync to reduce power consumption.
☆ Real-time monitoring of mobile phone temperature, remind users to unplug the charger to prevent overheating.
During charging, it will periodically monitor the temperature of the mobile phone. If it exceeds a certain threshold, it will remind the user that the phone is too hot and pay attention to safety.
☆ Accurately predict the remaining charging time and reset fully charged.
Through algorithms, estimate the time required to charge fully, to prevent overcharging and affect the battery life.
