Charging Master
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 118 keywords for Charging Master in Google Play
Charging Master tracks 118 keywords (6 keywords rank; 112 need traction). Key metrics: 17% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.1, difficulty 44.4, best rank 9.
Professional charging application
Tracked keywords
118
6 ranked • 112 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
17%
Best rank 9 • Latest leader 88
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: charged
Avg difficulty
44.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.5
charged
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank 88
Competitors: 627
- 62.6
charging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 347
- 65.2
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 569
- 62.9
notify
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 440
- 64.4
loss
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 636
Unranked opportunities
charging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 347
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 569
notify
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 55.7 • Competitors: 440
loss
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 636
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 505
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 391,175 • Major competitors: 18,123
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
mobile
Total apps: 280,368 • Major competitors: 11,033
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
using
Total apps: 224,577 • Major competitors: 12,364
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
way
Total apps: 203,405 • Major competitors: 11,336
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
phone
Total apps: 150,638 • Major competitors: 9,409
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| charge | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 19,017 competing apps Median installs: 3,183 Avg rating: 2.5 | 9 | 9 | 1,144 major competitor apps |
| battery | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,535 competing apps Median installs: 892 Avg rating: 2.3 | 49 | 49 | 1,421 major competitor apps |
| charged | 74 | 100 | 44 | 63 8,367 competing apps Median installs: 6,219 Avg rating: 2.8 | 88 | 88 | 627 major competitor apps |
| fully | 71 | 100 | 47 | 74 42,078 competing apps Median installs: 2,354 Avg rating: 2.5 | 167 | 167 | 2,016 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 35,034 competing apps Median installs: 2,305 Avg rating: 2.4 | 192 | 192 | 2,181 major competitor apps |
| reduce | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 25,118 competing apps Median installs: 1,091 Avg rating: 2.3 | 199 | 199 | 847 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 55 | 78 79,016 competing apps Median installs: 7,131 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 7,849 major competitor apps |
| phone | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 150,638 competing apps Median installs: 3,555 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 9,409 major competitor apps |
| handle | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 17,600 competing apps Median installs: 1,460 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,083 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,375 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,543 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 203,405 competing apps Median installs: 1,963 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 11,336 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,364 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 391,175 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,123 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,368 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,033 major competitor apps |
| pay | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 70,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,702 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,030 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,990 competing apps Median installs: 996 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,912 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 53 | 76 56,116 competing apps Median installs: 4,873 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,812 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,933 competing apps Median installs: 4,216 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,982 major competitor apps |
| monitor | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 65,078 competing apps Median installs: 496 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,729 major competitor apps |
| effective | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 37,343 competing apps Median installs: 1,095 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,230 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 66,376 competing apps Median installs: 2,283 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,105 major competitor apps |
| playing | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 56,305 competing apps Median installs: 9,830 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,361 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 88,003 competing apps Median installs: 1,689 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,607 major competitor apps |
| second | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 23,598 competing apps Median installs: 2,472 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,192 major competitor apps |
| charging | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 8,515 competing apps Median installs: 1,812 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 347 major competitor apps |
App Description
Professional charging application
There are two ways to charge faster:
The first is to use a higher power AC charger and avoid using USB charging because the current is too low;
The second is to reduce the power consumption and load of the phone as much as possible during the charging process to reduce the loss of electricity. If the electricity consumption can be reduced, the phone can be charged faster. For example, under normal circumstances, the phone can be charged for 1000mAh in an hour. But if the phone is continuously under high load, such as playing games, watching HD videos or turning on the flashlight, it may consume 300mAh in one hour. In this case, only 700mAh can be charged in one hour. However, if the electricity consumption can be reduced to 100mAh, the phone can be charged for 900mAh in one hour. This means that the charging speed indirectly increased by nearly 30%.
Explanation of the function description:
☆ Try to stop the work of your own background thread when charging.
During charging, avoid running background threads to reduce power consumption.
☆ Reduce screen brightness, reduce power consumption and reduce power consumption.
The screen LED is one of the main factors that consumes electricity, and reducing the screen brightness is a very effective way to reduce energy loss.
☆ Notify users to deal with abnormal power consumption increase in a short time.
If the electricity consumption speed increases in a short period of time, it indicates that there may be non-normal CPU loads. Users need to be reminded to handle them.
☆ Optimize WiFi, GPS, Bluetooth and other system settings to reduce mobile phone consumption.
Suggest that users turn off power-consuming devices such as WiFi, GPS, Bluetooth, and automatic sync to reduce power consumption.
☆ Real-time monitoring of mobile phone temperature, remind users to unplug the charger to prevent overheating.
During charging, it will periodically monitor the temperature of the mobile phone. If it exceeds a certain threshold, it will remind the user that the phone is too hot and pay attention to safety.
☆ Accurately predict the remaining charging time and reset fully charged.
Through algorithms, estimate the time required to charge fully, to prevent overcharging and affect the battery life.
