Play The Page Product Showcase
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 65 keywords for Play The Page Product Showcase in Google Play
Play The Page Product Showcase tracks 65 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 65 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 48.1.
What if your books could tell more than you can print?
Tracked keywords
65
0 ranked • 65 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: qr codes
Avg difficulty
48.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 60.6
qr codes
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 59.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 246
- 64.7
minimum
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 793
- 62.9
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
- 62.8
structure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 242
- 61.8
printed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 179
Unranked opportunities
qr codes
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 59.8 • Competitors: 246
minimum
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 793
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 381
structure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 242
printed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 179
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 327,701 • Major competitors: 14,519
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
without
Total apps: 211,639 • Major competitors: 10,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
play
Total apps: 206,958 • Major competitors: 18,529
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.1
perfect
Total apps: 201,326 • Major competitors: 10,917
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 206,958 competing apps Median installs: 6,219 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 18,529 major competitor apps |
| page | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 28,299 competing apps Median installs: 2,819 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,479 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 327,701 competing apps Median installs: 1,985 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14,519 major competitor apps |
| audio | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 67,250 competing apps Median installs: 3,259 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,223 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 54 | 76 62,071 competing apps Median installs: 2,203 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,472 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 124,534 competing apps Median installs: 778 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,271 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,618 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,519 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,776 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,602 major competitor apps |
| delivered | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 22,886 competing apps Median installs: 444 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 623 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 36,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,324 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,409 major competitor apps |
| perfect | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 201,326 competing apps Median installs: 1,836 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,917 major competitor apps |
| never | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 118,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,630 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,500 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 51,564 competing apps Median installs: 3,017 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,862 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,262 competing apps Median installs: 1,505 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,022 major competitor apps |
| qr codes | 74 | 100 | 60 | 61 6,339 competing apps Median installs: 516 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 74 | 100 | 45 | 65 11,573 competing apps Median installs: 4,324 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 793 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 28,546 competing apps Median installs: 1,092 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,050 major competitor apps |
| book | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 88,855 competing apps Median installs: 717 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,274 major competitor apps |
| visual | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 44,021 competing apps Median installs: 1,487 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,060 major competitor apps |
| fast | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 132,579 competing apps Median installs: 2,036 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,822 major competitor apps |
| yet | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 28,315 competing apps Median installs: 1,894 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,333 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,711 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,773 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 211,639 competing apps Median installs: 2,785 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,341 major competitor apps |
| books | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 22,863 competing apps Median installs: 3,355 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
App Description
What if your books could tell more than you can print?
Think of Play the Page as a QR code scanner, but without the need of having actual QR codes printed on any of the pages. This allows book publishers to seamlessly extend their readers' book experience, with minimum investment and effort.
The app was designed by a book publisher for book publishers. It is a book-cantered solution where any extra digital content is delivered while reading or studying with a printed book. It is perfect for activity books, study scripts, children’s books and language courses. Delivering extra content to books has never been that fast and straightforward.
Since Play the Page bases on readers’ traditional interaction with books and it does not require any form of specific visual identification on books’ pages - it can be applied to any book, even those already in stock. It liberates the books’ design and structure from multimedia requirements and yet makes your digital content extremely accessible.
Super easy to use - designed for and tested with 2-year-olds.