Plastics SIM
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 136 keywords for Plastics SIM in Google Play
Plastics SIM tracks 136 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 135 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 46.0, best rank 13.
Summary of functions for part and mold designers working in the plastic industry
Tracked keywords
136
1 ranked • 135 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 13 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: summary
Avg difficulty
46.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 259
- 66.0
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,035
- 65.7
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 487
- 64.4
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 368
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
Unranked opportunities
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 259
volume
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 1,035
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 487
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 368
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 348
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 368,929 • Major competitors: 21,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
make
Total apps: 327,341 • Major competitors: 18,223
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
like
Total apps: 289,444 • Major competitors: 20,631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
help
Total apps: 282,188 • Major competitors: 14,387
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
simple
Total apps: 256,476 • Major competitors: 11,035
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plastic | 72 | 100 | 35 | 54 2,344 competing apps Median installs: 2,488 Avg rating: 2.0 | 16 | 13 | 116 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 255,713 competing apps Median installs: 3,150 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,877 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 368,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 21,444 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,211 competing apps Median installs: 37,112 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,142 major competitor apps |
| change | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 90,509 competing apps Median installs: 3,508 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,877 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 142,080 competing apps Median installs: 480 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,028 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 327,341 competing apps Median installs: 2,047 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 18,223 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,250 competing apps Median installs: 1,765 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,984 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 56,144 competing apps Median installs: 1,254 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,569 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,327 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,340 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,149 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,683 competing apps Median installs: 1,041 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,052 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,108 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,316 major competitor apps |
| profile | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 38,936 competing apps Median installs: 872 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,600 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 43,001 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,671 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 114,267 competing apps Median installs: 2,067 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,060 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,899 competing apps Median installs: 2,015 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| variety | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 98,131 competing apps Median installs: 3,186 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,775 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 282,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 14,387 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,737 major competitor apps |
| special | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 108,682 competing apps Median installs: 2,053 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,526 major competitor apps |
| volume | 74 | 100 | 50 | 66 13,860 competing apps Median installs: 4,934 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,035 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,188 competing apps Median installs: 2,988 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| take | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 189,267 competing apps Median installs: 1,928 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 10,633 major competitor apps |
App Description
Summary of functions for part and mold designers working in the plastic industry
Some are simple, like how many mm has one inch? Others are more complex since a decision needs to be made to buy a hot runner system or use a cold runner instead.
And sometimes one just needs a little help to interpret a color code in the CAD model correctly.
In order to support the daily work of part and mold designers the application is divided in five main areas.
Let's take a look at each of them to see what is in it for you:
1. Unit Conversion
There is a selection of 16 groups that contains specific parameters for each group.
Each of the parameters in one group can be calculated into another, for example g/cm3 into lbm/in³.
The groups range from temperatures, specific volume and density down to mass, power and flow rate.
Each of the available parameters can be seen and is used in the plastic industry.
Convert one unit into another is often needed and fast done with the functions in this section.
2. Equivalent Diameter
This is a section dedicated to simulation guys. If a filling simulation needs to be done for a plastic part it is necessary to add the runner system for best results.
In order to make life easier a given real shape of a cold runner can be transformed into an equivalent diameter.
A diameter can be assigned to the runner element in simulation pretty easily and is simple to modify during optimization.
However, the shape of the cold runner influences the flow of the plastic. This is taken care in the calculation of the hydraulic diameter.
There is a variety of shapes available for which the hydraulic diameter can be calculated.
3. Dosing
There is a gap between part and mold designers doing simulation of the injection molding process and the setter on the shop floor.
Simulation guys tend to talk in s and at their best in cm³ while setter always think in mm and mm/s as well as cm³ and cm³/s.
In this section it is possible to transfer a given injection profile from one unit to another.
Moreover a special calculation for 2.5D and 3D simulation was added.
4. Comparison
In order to judge if something is getting better or worse it is good to take a look to the change as a percentage value.
This is the first main function in this section.
Enter two values and see what increase or decrease of
