Project FeederWatch

Developer: Cornell Lab of

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

12.1K installs

89 ratings

+29 weekly installs

trend steady

+162 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 62 keywords for Project FeederWatch in Google Play

Developer: Cornell Lab of Ornithology Category: education Rating: 2.44

Project FeederWatch tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 46.3.

Turn your love of feeding birds into scientific discoveries

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: new way

Avg difficulty

46.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

new way

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 433
63.1
north

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 355
62.9
scientific

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 318
64.3
contribute

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 222
63.3
count

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 679
66.0

Unranked opportunities

new way

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Competitors: 433
north

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 355
scientific

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 318
contribute

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.6 • Competitors: 222
count

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Competitors: 679

High competition keywords

new

Total apps: 375,249 • Major competitors: 23,968

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
access

Total apps: 333,757 • Major competitors: 12,342

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
find

Total apps: 302,834 • Major competitors: 17,561

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
mobile

Total apps: 280,245 • Major competitors: 11,030

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
best

Total apps: 250,470 • Major competitors: 18,391

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	66	100	57	86 250,470 competing apps Median installs: 4,208 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	18,391 major competitor apps
new	64	100	59	89 375,249 competing apps Median installs: 2,984 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	23,968 major competitor apps
feed	73	100	51	67 15,741 competing apps Median installs: 959 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	946 major competitor apps
version	70	100	54	76 56,451 competing apps Median installs: 4,962 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,369 major competitor apps
learn	67	100	55	82 141,355 competing apps Median installs: 2,298 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	7,061 major competitor apps
new way	74	100	48	63 9,035 competing apps Median installs: 1,362 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	433 major competitor apps
way	66	100	56	85 203,296 competing apps Median installs: 1,967 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	11,327 major competitor apps
immediately	72	100	43	69 22,518 competing apps Median installs: 3,282 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,005 major competitor apps
find	65	100	58	87 302,834 competing apps Median installs: 2,786 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	17,561 major competitor apps
canada	72	100	42	55 2,797 competing apps Median installs: 3,022 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	145 major competitor apps
food	69	100	49	77 69,850 competing apps Median installs: 430 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	2,275 major competitor apps
available	66	100	58	84 194,534 competing apps Median installs: 2,770 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	10,380 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 280,245 competing apps Median installs: 1,393 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	11,030 major competitor apps
visit	70	100	51	75 52,696 competing apps Median installs: 2,171 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	2,931 major competitor apps
access	65	100	59	88 333,757 competing apps Median installs: 1,158 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	12,342 major competitor apps
helping	71	100	45	73 36,534 competing apps Median installs: 982 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,240 major competitor apps
track	66	100	53	84 192,886 competing apps Median installs: 540 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	6,112 major competitor apps
real	67	100	57	83 170,089 competing apps Median installs: 2,776 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	12,908 major competitor apps
see	67	100	58	83 166,657 competing apps Median installs: 1,963 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	8,369 major competitor apps
work	68	100	55	81 120,257 competing apps Median installs: 1,899 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,252 major competitor apps
become	68	100	54	80 103,814 competing apps Median installs: 5,314 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	9,768 major competitor apps
love	68	100	56	81 115,047 competing apps Median installs: 5,421 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	9,040 major competitor apps
members	70	100	48	74 42,711 competing apps Median installs: 642 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,000 major competitor apps
archive	73	100	37	58 4,186 competing apps Median installs: 2,621 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	190 major competitor apps
web	71	100	52	74 41,269 competing apps Median installs: 1,371 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	1,824 major competitor apps

App Description

Turn your love of feeding birds into scientific discoveries

Do you feed birds? You can report what you see for science. Project FeederWatch, a joint project of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Birds Canada, monitors winter feeder-bird populations in North America. The FeederWatch Mobile App is a new way for Project FeederWatch members to contribute their bird counts.

Sign in to:
•Report birds that visit your count site in winter (US and Canada only)
•Track your sighting statistics in real time
•Access your archive of past counts from all years
•Contribute to North America’s largest database on feeder birds
•Find out what food and feeder types work best for the birds overwintering near you
•Identify and learn about feeder birds

FeederWatch Mobile automatically syncs with the web version for seamless multi-platform support. Your data become immediately available for scientific research, education, and conservation. Thank you for helping birds!