Project FeederWatch

Developer: Cornell Lab of

Category: Education

11.9K installs

89 ratings

+43 weekly installs

trend steady

+367 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 62 keywords for Project FeederWatch in Google Play

Developer: Cornell Lab of Ornithology Category: education Rating: 2.44

Project FeederWatch tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.3, difficulty 51.2.

Turn your love of feeding birds into scientific discoveries

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.3

Top keyword: largest

Avg difficulty

51.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

largest

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,165
68.1
feed

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 65.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 897
64.3
immediately

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,118
69.6
helping

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,392
71.1
project

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 506
66.0

Unranked opportunities

largest

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,165
feed

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 65.6 • Competitors: 897
immediately

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 1,118
helping

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.9 • Competitors: 1,392
project

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 506

High competition keywords

new

Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
find

Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
best

Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
access

Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	65	100	63	87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	18,001 major competitor apps
new	64	100	66	90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	25,823 major competitor apps
feed	72	100	66	64 5,791 competing apps Median installs: 43,509 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	897 major competitor apps
version	69	100	61	77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,300 major competitor apps
learn	67	100	61	82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,746 major competitor apps
new way	71	100	61	61 3,695 competing apps Median installs: 34,282 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	401 major competitor apps
way	66	100	61	85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	10,854 major competitor apps
immediately	72	100	45	70 11,872 competing apps Median installs: 32,552 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,118 major competitor apps
find	65	100	65	88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	16,874 major competitor apps
canada	70	100	49	54 1,397 competing apps Median installs: 30,008 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	138 major competitor apps
food	71	100	52	73 19,500 competing apps Median installs: 26,500 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,206 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
visit	70	100	57	75 23,850 competing apps Median installs: 31,586 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,738 major competitor apps
access	65	100	67	87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,667 major competitor apps
helping	72	100	48	71 14,477 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,392 major competitor apps
track	67	100	57	81 58,055 competing apps Median installs: 25,840 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,673 major competitor apps
real	67	100	64	83 74,834 competing apps Median installs: 53,568 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	11,689 major competitor apps
see	67	100	68	84 78,341 competing apps Median installs: 34,000 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	9,101 major competitor apps
work	68	100	61	81 52,752 competing apps Median installs: 28,708 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,048 major competitor apps
become	67	100	61	82 59,069 competing apps Median installs: 60,770 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	10,342 major competitor apps
love	67	100	62	82 60,143 competing apps Median installs: 47,097 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	8,442 major competitor apps
members	71	100	55	71 14,854 competing apps Median installs: 24,420 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,146 major competitor apps
archive	70	100	39	56 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 30,995 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	182 major competitor apps
web	71	100	61	72 16,914 competing apps Median installs: 27,890 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,758 major competitor apps

App Description

Turn your love of feeding birds into scientific discoveries

Do you feed birds? You can report what you see for science. Project FeederWatch, a joint project of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Birds Canada, monitors winter feeder-bird populations in North America. The FeederWatch Mobile App is a new way for Project FeederWatch members to contribute their bird counts.

Sign in to:
•Report birds that visit your count site in winter (US and Canada only)
•Track your sighting statistics in real time
•Access your archive of past counts from all years
•Contribute to North America’s largest database on feeder birds
•Find out what food and feeder types work best for the birds overwintering near you
•Identify and learn about feeder birds

FeederWatch Mobile automatically syncs with the web version for seamless multi-platform support. Your data become immediately available for scientific research, education, and conservation. Thank you for helping birds!