Mareas Las Palmas Gran Canaria
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for Mareas Las Palmas Gran Canaria in Google Play
Mareas Las Palmas Gran Canaria tracks 58 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 58 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 41.7.
Astronomical tides of Las Palmas de G. C. LPGC, Canary Islands, Spain.
Tracked keywords
58
0 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: error
Avg difficulty
41.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.1
error
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 377
- 61.7
scroll
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 421
- 62.5
sea
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 660
- 62.6
valid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 499
- 60.6
responsibility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 317
Unranked opportunities
error
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 377
scroll
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 421
sea
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 660
valid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 499
responsibility
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 317
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 391,175 • Major competitors: 18,119
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
every
Total apps: 262,778 • Major competitors: 14,702
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
data
Total apps: 177,045 • Major competitors: 7,061
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
based
Total apps: 154,090 • Major competitors: 5,983
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
check
Total apps: 134,066 • Major competitors: 7,484
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| navigation | 71 | 100 | 50 | 71 30,354 competing apps Median installs: 1,812 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,238 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 391,175 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,119 major competitor apps |
| de | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,616 competing apps Median installs: 1,572 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| touch | 69 | 100 | 52 | 76 62,393 competing apps Median installs: 1,873 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,721 major competitor apps |
| error | 74 | 100 | 40 | 62 7,865 competing apps Median installs: 5,716 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 56,437 competing apps Median installs: 2,177 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,887 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 27,844 competing apps Median installs: 1,304 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 72 | 100 | 53 | 71 29,165 competing apps Median installs: 5,484 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,691 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 43,571 competing apps Median installs: 3,009 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,283 major competitor apps |
| official | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 106,140 competing apps Median installs: 996 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,656 major competitor apps |
| internet | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,271 competing apps Median installs: 4,125 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,931 major competitor apps |
| check | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 134,066 competing apps Median installs: 2,141 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,484 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 262,778 competing apps Median installs: 2,257 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 14,702 major competitor apps |
| schedules | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 15,154 competing apps Median installs: 532 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 315 major competitor apps |
| low | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 25,789 competing apps Median installs: 4,492 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,794 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 57 | 84 177,045 competing apps Median installs: 1,350 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,061 major competitor apps |
| requires | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 30,951 competing apps Median installs: 2,492 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,557 major competitor apps |
| future | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 54,984 competing apps Median installs: 1,327 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,267 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 80,737 competing apps Median installs: 909 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,151 major competitor apps |
| ensure | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 71,642 competing apps Median installs: 961 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,658 major competitor apps |
| scroll | 74 | 100 | 46 | 62 7,432 competing apps Median installs: 1,998 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 421 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 154,090 competing apps Median installs: 1,414 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,983 major competitor apps |
| actual | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 15,428 competing apps Median installs: 2,394 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 748 major competitor apps |
| height | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,782 competing apps Median installs: 2,961 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| sea | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 8,345 competing apps Median installs: 5,120 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 660 major competitor apps |
App Description
Astronomical tides of Las Palmas de G. C. LPGC, Canary Islands, Spain.
Prediction of astronomical tides of the Port of Las Palmas (LPA GC), Canary Islands, Spain. (15.41 ° W 28.15 ° N)
DIRECTED:
A swimmers, surfers, swimmers and walkers of Playa de las Canteras (100 m from the port of LPA GC)
METHOD:
astronomical tide prediction by harmonic constants and data Mareógrafo Las Palmas G.C. Spain.
FEATURE OF APPLICATION:
• No need wifi or 3G, or Internet connection.
• No propaganda.
• With one touch the desired data is obtained.
• Fits small (Scroll horizontal and vertical) screens
• Predict future and past dates.
• Astronomical Tide Graph every 30 min. height in cm.
• schedules are adjusted to the local time in Las Palmas de G.C. (Summer: UTC + 1 in winter: UTC + 0).
• The maximum error of time of high tide (or low tide) is less than +/- 30 min. and / or +/- 20 cm.
• Permissions: This application requires no service.
DISCLAIMER:
The tide predictions are based on mathematical models and are not hallmarked by any official body, so
They ARE NOT VALID FOR NAVIGATION OR ANY OTHER NAUTICAL ACTIVITY.
It is the user's responsibility to ensure that the data are suitable for their activity and also check the actual sea conditions.
OWNER OF IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPER:
Owner: EGO Engineering
For suggestions contact: ingenieria.ego@gmail.com