Mareas Las Palmas Gran Canaria
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 58 keywords for Mareas Las Palmas Gran Canaria in Google Play
Mareas Las Palmas Gran Canaria tracks 58 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 58 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 45.9.
Astronomical tides of Las Palmas de G. C. LPGC, Canary Islands, Spain.
Tracked keywords
58
0 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: navigation
Avg difficulty
45.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 70.1
navigation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 58.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,141
- 66.0
de
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 644
- 62.4
error
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 372
- 68.8
activity
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 56.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 980
- 62.8
schedules
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 353
Unranked opportunities
navigation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 58.5 • Competitors: 1,141
de
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 644
error
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 372
activity
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 56.7 • Competitors: 980
schedules
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 353
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
internet
Total apps: 62,322 • Major competitors: 5,670
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| navigation | 72 | 100 | 58 | 70 12,601 competing apps Median installs: 27,732 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,141 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,241 competing apps Median installs: 22,978 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| touch | 70 | 100 | 58 | 76 27,478 competing apps Median installs: 40,045 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,581 major competitor apps |
| error | 72 | 100 | 42 | 62 4,512 competing apps Median installs: 31,886 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,961 competing apps Median installs: 32,987 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,750 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 57 | 69 10,591 competing apps Median installs: 28,338 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 980 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 71 | 100 | 62 | 72 17,127 competing apps Median installs: 39,571 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 20,163 competing apps Median installs: 33,595 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| official | 69 | 100 | 60 | 78 38,012 competing apps Median installs: 28,214 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,398 major competitor apps |
| internet | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 62,322 competing apps Median installs: 30,196 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,670 major competitor apps |
| check | 67 | 100 | 65 | 82 60,031 competing apps Median installs: 36,479 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 7,081 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 62 | 87 125,665 competing apps Median installs: 38,364 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,037 major competitor apps |
| schedules | 72 | 100 | 43 | 63 4,729 competing apps Median installs: 20,626 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 353 major competitor apps |
| low | 72 | 100 | 53 | 70 12,715 competing apps Median installs: 42,645 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| requires | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 15,340 competing apps Median installs: 33,836 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,687 major competitor apps |
| future | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 21,807 competing apps Median installs: 31,554 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,133 major competitor apps |
| local | 70 | 100 | 59 | 76 28,377 competing apps Median installs: 26,545 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,999 major competitor apps |
| ensure | 70 | 100 | 59 | 76 27,894 competing apps Median installs: 27,644 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,884 major competitor apps |
| scroll | 71 | 100 | 56 | 60 3,217 competing apps Median installs: 38,583 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 388 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 63 | 82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,592 major competitor apps |
| actual | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 6,933 competing apps Median installs: 33,245 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 696 major competitor apps |
| height | 70 | 100 | 40 | 56 1,817 competing apps Median installs: 35,726 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| sea | 72 | 100 | 44 | 62 4,435 competing apps Median installs: 49,172 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
App Description
Astronomical tides of Las Palmas de G. C. LPGC, Canary Islands, Spain.
Prediction of astronomical tides of the Port of Las Palmas (LPA GC), Canary Islands, Spain. (15.41 ° W 28.15 ° N)
DIRECTED:
A swimmers, surfers, swimmers and walkers of Playa de las Canteras (100 m from the port of LPA GC)
METHOD:
astronomical tide prediction by harmonic constants and data Mareógrafo Las Palmas G.C. Spain.
FEATURE OF APPLICATION:
• No need wifi or 3G, or Internet connection.
• No propaganda.
• With one touch the desired data is obtained.
• Fits small (Scroll horizontal and vertical) screens
• Predict future and past dates.
• Astronomical Tide Graph every 30 min. height in cm.
• schedules are adjusted to the local time in Las Palmas de G.C. (Summer: UTC + 1 in winter: UTC + 0).
• The maximum error of time of high tide (or low tide) is less than +/- 30 min. and / or +/- 20 cm.
• Permissions: This application requires no service.
DISCLAIMER:
The tide predictions are based on mathematical models and are not hallmarked by any official body, so
They ARE NOT VALID FOR NAVIGATION OR ANY OTHER NAUTICAL ACTIVITY.
It is the user's responsibility to ensure that the data are suitable for their activity and also check the actual sea conditions.
OWNER OF IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPER:
Owner: EGO Engineering
For suggestions contact: ingenieria.ego@gmail.com