Eligibility criteria of MHT

Developer: Plexus

Category: Health & Fitness

Add App to Comparison

5.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

+28 weekly installs

+144 monthly installs

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 55 keywords for Eligibility criteria of MHT in Google Play

Developer: Plexus Category: health_and_fitness Rating: 2.94

Eligibility criteria of MHT tracks 55 keywords (2 keywords rank; 53 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 42.5, best rank 7.

It allows to choose the THM indicated for each patient, endorsed by the AEEM

Tracked keywords

2 ranked • 53 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

100%

Best rank 7 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.8

Top keyword: patient

Avg difficulty

42.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patient

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 195
64.8
decision

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 541
64.8
scientific

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 303
64.3
replace

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 522
62.8
published

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 307
65.1

Unranked opportunities

patient

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
decision

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 541
scientific

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 303
replace

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 522
published

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 307

High competition keywords

download

Total apps: 332,448 • Major competitors: 15,779

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
information

Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed

Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,628

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
best

Total apps: 254,675 • Major competitors: 16,895

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
choose

Total apps: 196,321 • Major competitors: 12,235

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
eligibility	72	100	37	52 1,891 competing apps Median installs: 6,965 Avg rating: 2.1	7	7	162 major competitor apps
criteria	73	100	35	56 3,500 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 1.7	10	10	109 major competitor apps
download	65	100	57	88 332,448 competing apps Median installs: 1,712 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	15,779 major competitor apps
best	66	100	59	86 254,675 competing apps Median installs: 3,217 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	16,895 major competitor apps
collect	69	100	54	78 77,178 competing apps Median installs: 3,499 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	5,811 major competitor apps
support	67	100	55	83 169,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,289 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,314 major competitor apps
digital	68	100	52	81 123,675 competing apps Median installs: 795 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	4,256 major competitor apps
information	65	100	55	86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	7,571 major competitor apps
used	68	100	56	81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,709 major competitor apps
designed	65	100	54	86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	7,628 major competitor apps
educational	70	100	48	76 60,441 competing apps Median installs: 997 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	2,020 major competitor apps
choose	66	100	57	84 196,321 competing apps Median installs: 2,312 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	12,235 major competitor apps
program	70	100	46	74 43,195 competing apps Median installs: 1,483 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,234 major competitor apps
visit	70	100	52	75 53,258 competing apps Median installs: 1,869 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,818 major competitor apps
document	73	100	46	68 17,607 competing apps Median installs: 879 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	780 major competitor apps
helping	71	100	45	73 36,186 competing apps Median installs: 881 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,132 major competitor apps
patient	74	100	39	65 11,651 competing apps Median installs: 540 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	195 major competitor apps
professionals	72	100	43	71 27,520 competing apps Median installs: 433 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	382 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	54	84 178,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,251 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,820 major competitor apps
user	67	100	56	82 143,402 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	5,128 major competitor apps
provided	70	100	47	74 46,432 competing apps Median installs: 2,025 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,477 major competitor apps
decision	74	100	41	65 11,706 competing apps Median installs: 1,760 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	541 major competitor apps
data	67	100	58	84 180,122 competing apps Median installs: 1,181 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	6,587 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,689 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,417 major competitor apps
development	71	100	45	72 33,421 competing apps Median installs: 1,154 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	991 major competitor apps

App Description

It allows to choose the THM indicated for each patient, endorsed by the AEEM

MHT Eligibility Criteria is an App designed with the aim of helping professionals to choose the most appropriate hormone therapy for each woman. Based on the answers to a questionnaire, the program identifies the treatment of climacteric symptoms that best suits the conditions of the user. This information is provided for educational and informational purposes only, serves as a decision support for the practitioner and should not be used as a substitute for individualized physician assessment, nor does it replace the physician-patient assessment. The App does not collect user data and is endorsed by the AEEM.

It has been designed based on the consensus document on MHT eligibility criteria, published by the AEEM with the support of 21 other scientific societies (https://aeem.es/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/criterios-de-elegibilidad-electronico.pdf).

For more information, download the app or visit http://www.aeem.es.

Theramex has contributed to the digital development of the App.