Claims submission

Developer: EHIS

Category: Finance

Add App to Comparison

263 installs

Ratings not yet available

24 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +3.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 67 keywords for Claims submission in Google Play

Developer: EHIS Category: finance

Claims submission tracks 67 keywords (2 keywords rank; 65 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.0, difficulty 43.1, best rank 25.

Claims submission for Health facilities

Tracked keywords

2 ranked • 65 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 25 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: entry

Avg difficulty

43.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

entry

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 353
65.5
alert

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 741
66.2
encounter

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 977
65.8
authorized

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 331
63.2
robust

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 481
65.1

Unranked opportunities

entry

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 353
alert

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 741
encounter

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 977
authorized

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 331
robust

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 481

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 383,027 • Major competitors: 17,709

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
whether

Total apps: 191,834 • Major competitors: 7,661

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
data

Total apps: 182,626 • Major competitors: 7,206

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
provides

Total apps: 165,188 • Major competitors: 5,559

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
based

Total apps: 151,450 • Major competitors: 5,846

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
submit	72	100	44	70 25,938 competing apps Median installs: 731 Avg rating: 3.9	25	25	520 major competitor apps
claims	73	100	35	57 3,659 competing apps Median installs: 2,343 Avg rating: 3.6	25	25	114 major competitor apps
health	69	100	49	77 69,944 competing apps Median installs: 771 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,975 major competitor apps
member	72	100	44	71 27,780 competing apps Median installs: 1,300 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,092 major competitor apps
whether	66	100	53	84 191,834 competing apps Median installs: 990 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,661 major competitor apps
built	71	100	51	73 41,231 competing apps Median installs: 770 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,392 major competitor apps
time	64	100	58	89 383,027 competing apps Median installs: 1,492 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	17,709 major competitor apps
process	70	100	48	76 56,882 competing apps Median installs: 998 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,932 major competitor apps
efficiency	73	100	41	67 16,564 competing apps Median installs: 428 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	347 major competitor apps
validation	72	100	33	53 2,279 competing apps Median installs: 902 Avg rating: 3.7	—	—	49 major competitor apps
interface	68	100	50	81 114,573 competing apps Median installs: 1,215 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	3,709 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	54	83 165,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,559 major competitor apps
type	70	100	52	75 49,668 competing apps Median installs: 3,941 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,861 major competitor apps
feature	69	100	53	78 76,334 competing apps Median installs: 3,130 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,585 major competitor apps
check	67	100	57	82 137,091 competing apps Median installs: 2,116 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,582 major competitor apps
entry	74	100	43	65 12,982 competing apps Median installs: 1,130 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	353 major competitor apps
manual	72	100	46	69 21,073 competing apps Median installs: 1,266 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	825 major competitor apps
guide	69	100	48	77 72,103 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,221 major competitor apps
user	67	100	54	82 145,967 competing apps Median installs: 1,955 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	5,710 major competitor apps
web	71	100	52	74 41,984 competing apps Median installs: 1,367 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,858 major competitor apps
accuracy	73	100	43	67 16,156 competing apps Median installs: 1,538 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	662 major competitor apps
displayed	72	100	45	69 21,116 competing apps Median installs: 2,494 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	805 major competitor apps
important	68	100	52	81 118,156 competing apps Median installs: 1,440 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	4,289 major competitor apps
data	66	100	57	84 182,626 competing apps Median installs: 1,338 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,206 major competitor apps
main	69	100	50	77 69,016 competing apps Median installs: 3,030 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,575 major competitor apps

App Description

Claims submission for Health facilities

On EtNHIS the claim submission process has three main steps. These are 1) member identification and validation of eligibility for services, 2) capturing/recording of claim/encounter information, 3) approval/authorization of the claim for submission by authorized user from the provider. To increase efficiency and accuracy the claim submission platform has a robust data validation feature in built in to the system. This inbuilt data validation feature is based on predefined rules and helps in preventing data entry errors, reduces data entry time and effort, and provides important input, in the form of alert or flagging, for claim adjudicator to guide the claim review and adjudication process. Some of the flags displayed for the adjudicator based on the data validation feature built in the submission app are the type of check in(manual vs automatic/system check in), the membership status of the beneficiary (expired or not), the referral status of the claim (whether the inbound referral is linked or not), etc. Although the system is meant for claim submission, it also has a feature/interface in to the claim adjudication & reimbursement web of the payer that gives the health facilities visibility about the status of the claims they submitted.