eCasing Fundamentals
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 25 keywords for eCasing Fundamentals in Google Play
eCasing Fundamentals tracks 25 keywords (2 keywords rank; 23 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.8, difficulty 42.9, best rank 1.
Goodyear's successful eCasing platform to inspect casings.
Tracked keywords
25
2 ranked • 23 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 1 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: fleet
Avg difficulty
42.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
fleet
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 279
- 58.5
fundamental
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank 1
Competitors: 109
- 55.1
dispatch
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 67.6
successful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 662
- 58.6
inspection
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
Unranked opportunities
fleet
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 279
dispatch
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.5 • Competitors: 95
successful
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 662
inspection
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Competitors: 102
accepted
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 35.5 • Competitors: 115
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,628
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
manage
Total apps: 184,906 • Major competitors: 6,741
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
platform
Total apps: 124,588 • Major competitors: 2,737
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
used
Total apps: 116,547 • Major competitors: 4,709
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
collection
Total apps: 99,442 • Major competitors: 4,166
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fundamental | 73 | 100 | 39 | 59 4,703 competing apps Median installs: 1,838 Avg rating: 1.8 | 1 | 1 | 109 major competitor apps |
| fundamentals | 72 | 100 | 33 | 54 2,339 competing apps Median installs: 1,476 Avg rating: 1.7 | 7 | 7 | 39 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,442 competing apps Median installs: 3,176 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,166 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 7,628 major competitor apps |
| manage | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 184,906 competing apps Median installs: 672 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,741 major competitor apps |
| dispatch | 73 | 100 | 36 | 55 2,856 competing apps Median installs: 899 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,860 competing apps Median installs: 594 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,169 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 44,311 competing apps Median installs: 3,270 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,288 major competitor apps |
| customers | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,715 competing apps Median installs: 611 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,549 major competitor apps |
| fleet | 75 | 100 | 40 | 64 9,959 competing apps Median installs: 618 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 50,027 competing apps Median installs: 2,038 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,202 major competitor apps |
| reduce | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 24,865 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 767 major competitor apps |
| carbon footprint | 70 | 100 | 32 | 44 560 competing apps Median installs: 584 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| successful | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,635 competing apps Median installs: 1,266 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 662 major competitor apps |
| platform | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 124,588 competing apps Median installs: 643 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 2,737 major competitor apps |
| thanks | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 32,896 competing apps Median installs: 1,598 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,417 major competitor apps |
| carbon | 72 | 100 | 37 | 54 2,447 competing apps Median installs: 895 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
| inspect | 71 | 100 | 31 | 49 1,161 competing apps Median installs: 1,446 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| inspection | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 4,771 competing apps Median installs: 689 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| footprint | 71 | 100 | 33 | 49 1,249 competing apps Median installs: 939 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| steps | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,196 competing apps Median installs: 1,095 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 878 major competitor apps |
| accepted | 73 | 100 | 35 | 55 2,928 competing apps Median installs: 2,527 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 115 major competitor apps |
| cure | 72 | 100 | 34 | 51 1,496 competing apps Median installs: 6,564 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 111 major competitor apps |
| captures | 73 | 100 | 38 | 58 4,117 competing apps Median installs: 1,662 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
App Description
Goodyear's successful eCasing platform to inspect casings.
Inspected and accepted casings will be used in our mold-cure retread process. Thanks to our retreads, our customers run their fleet as efficient as possible and reduce the carbon footprint of their operations.