EVASION, attention et lecture
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 131 keywords for EVASION, attention et lecture in Google Play
EVASION, attention et lecture tracks 131 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 131 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 46.2.
An educational game that trains visual attention for effective reading
Tracked keywords
131
0 ranked • 131 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: aspect
Avg difficulty
46.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
aspect
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 516
- 64.0
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 312
- 65.8
grade
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 574
- 60.4
algorithm
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 309
- 62.6
adapts
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 271
Unranked opportunities
aspect
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 516
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 312
grade
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 574
algorithm
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 309
adapts
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 271
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,388 • Major competitors: 16,211
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
easy
Total apps: 327,746 • Major competitors: 14,534
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
make
Total apps: 327,400 • Major competitors: 18,245
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
designed
Total apps: 260,993 • Major competitors: 7,557
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
without
Total apps: 211,678 • Major competitors: 10,361
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fun | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 169,007 competing apps Median installs: 5,275 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 14,193 major competitor apps |
| word | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 50,128 competing apps Median installs: 3,080 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,199 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 109,646 competing apps Median installs: 1,860 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,427 major competitor apps |
| software | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 31,509 competing apps Median installs: 1,379 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,040 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 327,746 competing apps Median installs: 1,989 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14,534 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 327,400 competing apps Median installs: 2,052 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 18,245 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,266 competing apps Median installs: 1,768 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,987 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,684 competing apps Median installs: 1,041 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,052 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,216 competing apps Median installs: 2,386 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,654 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,993 competing apps Median installs: 725 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,557 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 60,752 competing apps Median installs: 981 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,024 major competitor apps |
| aspect | 74 | 100 | 44 | 63 9,353 competing apps Median installs: 1,628 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 516 major competitor apps |
| avoid | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 34,656 competing apps Median installs: 2,253 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,944 major competitor apps |
| choose | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 195,600 competing apps Median installs: 2,307 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 12,132 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 19,873 competing apps Median installs: 3,884 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,340 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,388 competing apps Median installs: 1,265 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,211 major competitor apps |
| offer | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 87,818 competing apps Median installs: 1,129 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,575 major competitor apps |
| exercises | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,409 competing apps Median installs: 1,344 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 469 major competitor apps |
| special | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 108,683 competing apps Median installs: 2,056 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,530 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 51,562 competing apps Median installs: 3,016 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,862 major competitor apps |
| move | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 50,684 competing apps Median installs: 2,830 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,088 major competitor apps |
| mission | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 33,003 competing apps Median installs: 1,457 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,073 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 48,196 competing apps Median installs: 1,182 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,767 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 57,592 competing apps Median installs: 1,658 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,716 major competitor apps |
| evaluations | 71 | 100 | 30 | 48 1,092 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
App Description
An educational game that trains visual attention for effective reading
How does it work?
In each of the 4 EVASION mini-games, the child's mission is to identify and “catch” sequences of target letters (for example, H D S) which move quickly on the screen. He must identify the targets very precisely to avoid other letter sequences, which are only distractors (for example, H S D). As the game progresses, the sequences of letters become longer and longer, the time to identify each sequence becomes shorter and shorter, and the targets become more and more similar to distractors. With increasing difficulty, the child must mobilize more and more visual attention. For personalized learning, the software includes an algorithm that adapts the difficulty of the game to the level of each player in real time. Visual attention is trained very gradually according to each person’s needs.
Is the training effective?
An experiment made it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of in-class training. The study was carried out with hundreds of first grade children, aged between 6 and 7 years old. Evaluations carried out before and after training show that children who trained with EVASION improved their visual attention. They are able to identify more letters at the same time; they read better and faster and have better scores in word dictation. This progress can be attributed to the application for three reasons:
(1) Children who used EVASION progressed more than children of the same age who used other software for the same training period;
(2) They also progress more than children who have not used any software but attend school regularly;
(3) Children who make more progress in reading and dictation when they have trained longer with EVASION.
How long is the training?
To be effective, training must be relatively intensive. It is recommended to offer 3 sessions of 15 to 20 minutes per week, for 10 weeks, or 10 hours of training in total. We know that less than 5 hours of training is not enough to achieve progress in reading and spelling.
Who is EVASION for?
ESCAPE involves an aspect of visual attention which is essential for learning to read. It is therefore recommended to use it at the start of learning (CP) with the aim of prevention. Use at the end of the main kindergarten section is also possible if the child has learned to recognize isolated letters. The software can also be offered to older children (CE or CM) who have learning difficulties.
What implementation in class?
EVASION was designed to be used relatively independently. The software is easy to use even for young children and the progress of the exercises is managed automatically, without requiring any special handling from the teacher. Teachers often choose small group use.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Link to the popular scientific publication: https://fondamentapps.com/wp-content/uploads/fondamentapps-synthese-evasion.pdf
Link to the scientific article: https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/rrq.576
To test EVAsion, go here: https://fondamentapps.com/#contact
