FSAP-LET
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 83 keywords for FSAP-LET in Google Play
FSAP-LET tracks 83 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 83 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 45.6.
Provides laboratory checklists based on US regulations and biosafety standards
Tracked keywords
83
0 ranked • 83 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: facility
Avg difficulty
45.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
facility
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 233
- 65.4
print
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 541
- 62.6
rooms
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 792
- 63.4
response
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 289
- 61.9
agent
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 285
Unranked opportunities
facility
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 233
print
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 541
rooms
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 792
response
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 289
agent
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 285
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
available
Total apps: 199,899 • Major competitors: 9,729
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| security | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 52,577 competing apps Median installs: 1,699 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,747 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 75,078 competing apps Median installs: 1,819 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,979 major competitor apps |
| software | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 31,510 competing apps Median installs: 1,379 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,041 major competitor apps |
| internal | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 16,816 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 107,978 competing apps Median installs: 2,602 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,164 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,899 competing apps Median installs: 2,015 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 136,849 competing apps Median installs: 1,367 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,403 major competitor apps |
| variety | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 98,131 competing apps Median installs: 3,186 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,775 major competitor apps |
| program | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 43,327 competing apps Median installs: 1,464 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,222 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,573 competing apps Median installs: 2,109 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,950 major competitor apps |
| document | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 17,753 competing apps Median installs: 848 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 785 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 44,572 competing apps Median installs: 3,186 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,284 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 165,742 competing apps Median installs: 1,224 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,954 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 101,554 competing apps Median installs: 1,112 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,592 major competitor apps |
| contains | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 66,906 competing apps Median installs: 3,651 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,940 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 49,421 competing apps Median installs: 3,058 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,612 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,711 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,773 major competitor apps |
| assist | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 18,574 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 712 major competitor apps |
| 74 | 100 | 47 | 65 12,807 competing apps Median installs: 2,204 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 541 major competitor apps |
App Description
Provides laboratory checklists based on US regulations and biosafety standards
The tool allows the user to print a single PDF document summarizing the recorded findings. The tool also allows the user to record any corrective actions taken in response to identified findings. The resulting PDF document can be stored locally, saved to a facility’s computer, or emailed to someone using the default client of the system.
FSAP-LET allows for similar checklists to be used for multiple rooms or buildings, or at future points in time. FSAP-LET also allows for facility information to be saved so that it does not have to be input each time a checklist is used. However, the information can be edited as needed.
All data in the system, including findings, comments and corrective actions, are encrypted so that it is only available to the user. The software will not run on a device that does not have security of some type (e.g., biometrics, password/phrase).
While the tool is intended to assist laboratories in meeting federal regulations and biosafety standards, it is not all-inclusive. The responsibility to fully adhere to applicable federal regulations remains with the entity using the tool.
Any available updates to the application will be communicated to users.
