FSAP-LET
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 83 keywords for FSAP-LET in Google Play
FSAP-LET tracks 83 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 83 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 49.4.
Provides laboratory checklists based on US regulations and biosafety standards
Tracked keywords
83
0 ranked • 83 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.7
Top keyword: pdf
Avg difficulty
49.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
pdf
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 918
- 67.7
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,026
- 67.9
similar
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,267
- 68.3
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 830
- 67.7
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 786
Unranked opportunities
pdf
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.8 • Competitors: 918
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,026
similar
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 65.4 • Competitors: 1,267
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 830
intended
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.3 • Competitors: 786
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
us
Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| security | 70 | 100 | 64 | 74 22,681 competing apps Median installs: 36,021 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,764 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,952 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 55 | 70 13,182 competing apps Median installs: 24,654 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,054 major competitor apps |
| internal | 72 | 100 | 48 | 65 6,261 competing apps Median installs: 25,932 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 571 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 72 | 81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,390 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| variety | 68 | 100 | 57 | 80 49,032 competing apps Median installs: 47,792 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,236 major competitor apps |
| program | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 19,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,294 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,273 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| document | 72 | 100 | 51 | 65 6,562 competing apps Median installs: 30,678 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 782 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 57 | 74 21,776 competing apps Median installs: 53,680 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,447 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,793 major competitor apps |
| contains | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 38,895 competing apps Median installs: 27,025 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,326 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 37,985 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,782 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
| assist | 72 | 100 | 58 | 66 7,512 competing apps Median installs: 30,940 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 716 major competitor apps |
| 72 | 100 | 53 | 65 5,992 competing apps Median installs: 28,108 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 562 major competitor apps |
App Description
Provides laboratory checklists based on US regulations and biosafety standards
The tool allows the user to print a single PDF document summarizing the recorded findings. The tool also allows the user to record any corrective actions taken in response to identified findings. The resulting PDF document can be stored locally, saved to a facility’s computer, or emailed to someone using the default client of the system.
FSAP-LET allows for similar checklists to be used for multiple rooms or buildings, or at future points in time. FSAP-LET also allows for facility information to be saved so that it does not have to be input each time a checklist is used. However, the information can be edited as needed.
All data in the system, including findings, comments and corrective actions, are encrypted so that it is only available to the user. The software will not run on a device that does not have security of some type (e.g., biometrics, password/phrase).
While the tool is intended to assist laboratories in meeting federal regulations and biosafety standards, it is not all-inclusive. The responsibility to fully adhere to applicable federal regulations remains with the entity using the tool.
Any available updates to the application will be communicated to users.
AppGoblin