NLE Calc

Developer: Centers for Disease

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

4.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

253 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +232

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 43 keywords for NLE Calc in Google Play

Developer: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Category: tools

NLE Calc tracks 43 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 43 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.6, difficulty 42.2.

Calculates RWL, LI, and CLI for lifting tasks.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 43 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.6

Top keyword: refer

Avg difficulty

42.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

refer

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 370
63.7
calculates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 136
59.2
limit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,291
65.5
performing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 397
60.9
workers

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 192
60.3

Unranked opportunities

refer

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 370
calculates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Competitors: 136
limit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 1,291
performing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 397
workers

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.1 • Competitors: 192

High competition keywords

based

Total apps: 151,543 • Major competitors: 5,852

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
multiple

Total apps: 131,625 • Major competitors: 9,050

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
please

Total apps: 127,983 • Major competitors: 6,922

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
used

Total apps: 115,888 • Major competitors: 5,095

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
single

Total apps: 75,708 • Major competitors: 4,294

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
single	69	100	51	78 75,708 competing apps Median installs: 2,296 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,294 major competitor apps
used	68	100	54	81 115,888 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,095 major competitor apps
protecting	73	100	42	59 5,073 competing apps Median installs: 4,445 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	386 major competitor apps
multiple	67	100	55	82 131,625 competing apps Median installs: 2,903 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	9,050 major competitor apps
task	72	100	50	69 22,550 competing apps Median installs: 1,398 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,197 major competitor apps
related	70	100	48	76 57,714 competing apps Median installs: 1,802 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,960 major competitor apps
please	67	100	53	81 127,983 competing apps Median installs: 5,028 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	6,922 major competitor apps
manual	72	100	46	69 21,067 competing apps Median installs: 1,265 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	826 major competitor apps
back	70	100	53	75 52,881 competing apps Median installs: 3,442 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	3,662 major competitor apps
publication	73	100	34	55 2,885 competing apps Median installs: 1,757 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	61 major competitor apps
calculate	72	100	44	70 24,860 competing apps Median installs: 1,476 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	775 major competitor apps
low	72	100	48	71 26,944 competing apps Median installs: 4,273 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,843 major competitor apps
weight	73	100	43	68 17,865 competing apps Median installs: 1,435 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	804 major competitor apps
physical	71	100	45	72 32,435 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,253 major competitor apps
stress	72	100	45	69 21,181 competing apps Median installs: 2,359 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,367 major competitor apps
based	67	100	55	82 151,543 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,852 major competitor apps
pub	70	100	29	45 713 competing apps Median installs: 1,108 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	17 major competitor apps
development	71	100	45	72 33,675 competing apps Median installs: 1,296 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,060 major competitor apps
details	69	100	49	77 66,391 competing apps Median installs: 1,227 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,422 major competitor apps
recommended	73	100	44	68 18,812 competing apps Median installs: 4,197 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,017 major competitor apps
calculates	74	100	36	59 5,243 competing apps Median installs: 1,530 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	136 major competitor apps
results	70	100	47	74 45,081 competing apps Median installs: 1,702 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,525 major competitor apps
limit	74	100	45	65 12,926 competing apps Median installs: 8,146 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,291 major competitor apps
calculator	73	100	45	69 20,511 competing apps Median installs: 1,606 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	736 major competitor apps
applications	72	100	49	70 24,637 competing apps Median installs: 4,438 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,133 major competitor apps

App Description

Calculates RWL, LI, and CLI for lifting tasks.

The NIOSH Lifting Equation calculator (NLE Calc) is based on the Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (Pub No. 94-110) and can be used to calculate the Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) and for single or multiple lifting tasks. The Lifting Index (LI) is an index of the relative physical stress for performing a single lifting task and the Composite Lifting Index (CLI) is an index of the overall physical stress for performing multiple lifting tasks. NIOSH recommends an LI and a CLI of 1 or less for protecting workers from physical stress related to development of low back musculoskeletal disorders. Please refer to the Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation publication for examples and details on how calculations are performed and what the results imply.