NLE Calc

Developer: Centers for Disease

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

4.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

291 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +70

Steady

Monthly +242

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 43 keywords for NLE Calc in Google Play

Developer: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Category: tools Rating: 2.24

NLE Calc tracks 43 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 43 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.6, difficulty 43.0.

Calculates RWL, LI, and CLI for lifting tasks.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 43 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.6

Top keyword: refer

Avg difficulty

43.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

refer

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 329
63.7
calculates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 126
59.3
limit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,195
65.4
performing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 354
60.9
workers

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 174
60.4

Unranked opportunities

refer

Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 329
calculates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Competitors: 126
limit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 1,195
performing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 354
workers

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 174

High competition keywords

based

Total apps: 152,098 • Major competitors: 5,361

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
multiple

Total apps: 130,551 • Major competitors: 8,222

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
please

Total apps: 128,374 • Major competitors: 6,234

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
used

Total apps: 116,194 • Major competitors: 4,649

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
single

Total apps: 75,078 • Major competitors: 3,979

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
single	69	100	52	78 75,078 competing apps Median installs: 1,819 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,979 major competitor apps
used	68	100	55	81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,649 major competitor apps
protecting	73	100	44	59 5,088 competing apps Median installs: 3,380 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	360 major competitor apps
multiple	67	100	57	81 130,551 competing apps Median installs: 2,326 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	8,222 major competitor apps
task	72	100	52	69 22,389 competing apps Median installs: 1,218 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,076 major competitor apps
related	70	100	49	76 57,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,780 major competitor apps
please	67	100	54	81 128,374 competing apps Median installs: 3,780 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	6,234 major competitor apps
manual	72	100	47	69 20,891 competing apps Median installs: 1,014 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	753 major competitor apps
back	70	100	54	75 53,024 competing apps Median installs: 2,847 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	3,343 major competitor apps
publication	73	100	34	55 2,872 competing apps Median installs: 1,606 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	56 major competitor apps
calculate	72	100	44	70 24,727 competing apps Median installs: 1,193 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	699 major competitor apps
low	72	100	50	70 26,657 competing apps Median installs: 3,346 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,709 major competitor apps
weight	73	100	44	68 17,750 competing apps Median installs: 1,290 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	753 major competitor apps
physical	71	100	45	72 32,283 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,132 major competitor apps
stress	72	100	46	69 20,913 competing apps Median installs: 2,031 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,255 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,361 major competitor apps
pub	70	100	29	45 709 competing apps Median installs: 1,086 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	16 major competitor apps
development	71	100	45	72 33,545 competing apps Median installs: 1,139 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	993 major competitor apps
details	69	100	50	77 66,583 competing apps Median installs: 1,054 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,213 major competitor apps
recommended	73	100	44	68 18,895 competing apps Median installs: 3,094 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	950 major competitor apps
calculates	74	100	36	59 5,265 competing apps Median installs: 1,224 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	126 major competitor apps
results	70	100	47	74 45,276 competing apps Median installs: 1,427 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,378 major competitor apps
limit	74	100	46	65 12,832 competing apps Median installs: 6,552 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,195 major competitor apps
calculator	73	100	45	69 20,381 competing apps Median installs: 1,346 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	643 major competitor apps
applications	72	100	51	70 24,700 competing apps Median installs: 3,196 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,034 major competitor apps

App Description

Calculates RWL, LI, and CLI for lifting tasks.

The NIOSH Lifting Equation calculator (NLE Calc) is based on the Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (Pub No. 94-110) and can be used to calculate the Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) and for single or multiple lifting tasks. The Lifting Index (LI) is an index of the relative physical stress for performing a single lifting task and the Composite Lifting Index (CLI) is an index of the overall physical stress for performing multiple lifting tasks. NIOSH recommends an LI and a CLI of 1 or less for protecting workers from physical stress related to development of low back musculoskeletal disorders. Please refer to the Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation publication for examples and details on how calculations are performed and what the results imply.