Digestive Endoscopy
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for Digestive Endoscopy in Google Play
Digestive Endoscopy tracks 66 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 65 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.3, difficulty 43.7, best rank 12.
An application developed to support physicians in their daily practice.
Tracked keywords
66
1 ranked • 65 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 12 • Latest leader 12
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: endorsed
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.0
endorsed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank 12
Competitors: 349
- 61.5
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 62.1
ongoing
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 244
- 63.0
residents
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 146
Unranked opportunities
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 170
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
ongoing
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 244
residents
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 146
familiar
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.0 • Competitors: 552
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 280,962 • Major competitors: 14,384
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
easily
Total apps: 214,726 • Major competitors: 8,338
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
support
Total apps: 169,442 • Major competitors: 7,314
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
daily
Total apps: 168,659 • Major competitors: 7,761
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
always
Total apps: 142,761 • Major competitors: 6,069
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| endorsed | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,005 competing apps Median installs: 3,394 Avg rating: 1.8 | 12 | 12 | 349 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 55,904 competing apps Median installs: 1,282 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,569 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 169,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,290 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,314 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 54 | 76 61,785 competing apps Median installs: 2,244 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,468 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,289 competing apps Median installs: 558 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,711 competing apps Median installs: 1,060 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 834 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,442 competing apps Median installs: 3,176 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,166 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 110,628 competing apps Median installs: 502 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,438 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 280,962 competing apps Median installs: 1,692 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14,384 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 42,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,496 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,894 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 35,446 competing apps Median installs: 4,677 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,411 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 45 | 57 3,825 competing apps Median installs: 1,750 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 54,178 competing apps Median installs: 946 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,271 major competitor apps |
| today | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 103,217 competing apps Median installs: 770 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,453 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,651 competing apps Median installs: 540 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| practical | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 34,942 competing apps Median installs: 839 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 784 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 214,726 competing apps Median installs: 1,310 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 8,338 major competitor apps |
| always | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 142,761 competing apps Median installs: 1,488 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,069 major competitor apps |
| diverse | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 45,535 competing apps Median installs: 1,519 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,568 major competitor apps |
| assist | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 18,533 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 53,299 competing apps Median installs: 2,975 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,424 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 41,858 competing apps Median installs: 3,200 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,234 major competitor apps |
| progress | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 86,939 competing apps Median installs: 584 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,947 major competitor apps |
| subject | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 15,740 competing apps Median installs: 2,924 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 800 major competitor apps |
| ongoing | 74 | 100 | 45 | 62 7,870 competing apps Median installs: 785 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 244 major competitor apps |
App Description
An application developed to support physicians in their daily practice.
A useful and practical application, containing more than 150 endoscopic classifications and algorithms, developed to support physicians in their daily practice.
As a result of ongoing technological innovation in the field of diagnostic imaging, nowadays endoscopy can rely on an extensive classification of endoscopic presentations of the most diverse gastrointestinal diseases.
Hence, today endoscopists can easily exchange views and speak a common language with physician teams involved in patient care by providing a concise picture of the patient’s clinical situation along with adequate management of disease progress and follow-up diagnostic investigations.
The purpose of this collection of endoscopic classifications, score and algorithms divided by organ and subject is to help endoscopists prepare accurate and updated medical reports, and also to assist general practitioners, medical residents and other non-gastroenterologist specialists, who are often required to read and decipher acronyms and classifications that are not always familiar to them.