EmoPaint – Paint your emotions
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 60 keywords for EmoPaint – Paint your emotions in Google Play
EmoPaint – Paint your emotions tracks 60 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 60 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.5, difficulty 45.2.
Be aware of your body sensations and emotions in novel ways
Tracked keywords
60
0 ranked • 60 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.5
Top keyword: aimed
Avg difficulty
45.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.1
aimed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 60.1
diary
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 301
- 63.9
academy
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 183
- 64.1
aware
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 440
- 60.3
algorithm
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 338
Unranked opportunities
aimed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 168
diary
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 301
academy
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 183
aware
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 440
algorithm
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 338
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 391,175 • Major competitors: 18,119
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
free
Total apps: 315,041 • Major competitors: 24,095
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
different
Total apps: 185,522 • Major competitors: 14,949
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
see
Total apps: 166,657 • Major competitors: 8,369
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
personal
Total apps: 152,667 • Major competitors: 7,084
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 315,041 competing apps Median installs: 5,777 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 24,095 major competitor apps |
| maps | 73 | 100 | 57 | 68 19,711 competing apps Median installs: 3,790 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,474 major competitor apps |
| exercise | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 20,968 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,064 major competitor apps |
| mode | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 67,564 competing apps Median installs: 5,381 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,720 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 31,784 competing apps Median installs: 1,818 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,473 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,828 competing apps Median installs: 954 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,417 competing apps Median installs: 1,946 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,203 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 47,086 competing apps Median installs: 3,036 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,518 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 391,175 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,119 major competitor apps |
| international | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,092 competing apps Median installs: 2,048 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,978 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,136 competing apps Median installs: 4,479 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,648 major competitor apps |
| update | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 51,470 competing apps Median installs: 1,864 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,611 major competitor apps |
| diary | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 5,908 competing apps Median installs: 2,377 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 301 major competitor apps |
| academy | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 10,226 competing apps Median installs: 503 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| free mode | 69 | 100 | 33 | 41 367 competing apps Median installs: 25,847 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| personal | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 152,667 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 7,084 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 166,657 competing apps Median installs: 1,963 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 8,369 major competitor apps |
| feature | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 77,427 competing apps Median installs: 3,088 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,685 major competitor apps |
| aware | 74 | 100 | 40 | 64 10,507 competing apps Median installs: 1,818 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 440 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 64,554 competing apps Median installs: 3,736 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,305 major competitor apps |
| detected | 72 | 100 | 46 | 52 1,925 competing apps Median installs: 4,601 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 135 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 185,522 competing apps Median installs: 5,273 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 14,949 major competitor apps |
| apps | 70 | 100 | 65 | 76 60,569 competing apps Median installs: 4,876 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,941 major competitor apps |
| algorithm | 74 | 100 | 39 | 60 6,075 competing apps Median installs: 3,395 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 338 major competitor apps |
| emotions | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 6,988 competing apps Median installs: 4,190 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
App Description
Be aware of your body sensations and emotions in novel ways
With EmoPaint, you can:
• Represent your bodily sensations in a novel way, by painting them interactively on the screen, in a free mode or following a Mindfulness exercise (body scan).
• Have your emotions detected through an analysis of your painting. The analysis starts with the Bodily Maps of Emotions proposed by Nummenmaa et al. (see reference below), but we have also added a machine learning algorithm that gives you the option to teach the app to recognize your personal patterns of sensations.
• Create a diary of your emotions. The app can automatically update the diary each time you paint your sensations. [THIS FEATURE BECOMES ACTIVE AFTER 4 WEEKS OF USE]
• See different infographics about your emotions over time. [THIS FEATURE BECOMES ACTIVE AFTER 4 WEEKS OF USE]
Scientific Reference:
L. Nummenmaa, E. Glerean, R. Hari, and J. K. Hietanen (2014). “Bodily maps of emotions”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, PNAS 111(2), 646-651
