EmoPaint – Paint your emotions
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 60 keywords for EmoPaint – Paint your emotions in Google Play
EmoPaint – Paint your emotions tracks 60 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 60 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 50.3.
Be aware of your body sensations and emotions in novel ways
Tracked keywords
60
0 ranked • 60 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: maps
Avg difficulty
50.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.3
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 70.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,419
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 67.7
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 954
- 67.2
exercise
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,041
- 70.5
active
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
Unranked opportunities
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 70.4 • Competitors: 1,419
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
becomes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 954
exercise
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.6 • Competitors: 1,041
active
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 1,388
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 173,844 • Major competitors: 23,343
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
see
Total apps: 78,341 • Major competitors: 9,101
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.4
personal
Total apps: 60,197 • Major competitors: 6,497
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 64 | 100 | 64 | 90 173,844 competing apps Median installs: 46,597 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 23,343 major competitor apps |
| maps | 73 | 100 | 70 | 68 9,914 competing apps Median installs: 45,030 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,419 major competitor apps |
| exercise | 72 | 100 | 48 | 67 8,537 competing apps Median installs: 36,740 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,041 major competitor apps |
| mode | 69 | 100 | 65 | 78 35,564 competing apps Median installs: 53,723 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 5,505 major competitor apps |
| active | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 13,334 competing apps Median installs: 30,112 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,913 competing apps Median installs: 20,150 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 26,487 competing apps Median installs: 29,378 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,446 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| international | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 15,943 competing apps Median installs: 33,008 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,857 major competitor apps |
| added | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 23,852 competing apps Median installs: 42,355 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,862 major competitor apps |
| update | 70 | 100 | 66 | 74 22,777 competing apps Median installs: 36,732 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,519 major competitor apps |
| diary | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,732 competing apps Median installs: 29,952 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 290 major competitor apps |
| academy | 71 | 100 | 37 | 58 2,609 competing apps Median installs: 13,118 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| free mode | 68 | 100 | 36 | 41 250 competing apps Median installs: 96,679 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| personal | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 60,197 competing apps Median installs: 33,210 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,497 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 68 | 84 78,341 competing apps Median installs: 34,000 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 9,101 major competitor apps |
| feature | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 40,911 competing apps Median installs: 39,110 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,125 major competitor apps |
| aware | 72 | 100 | 41 | 62 4,398 competing apps Median installs: 31,492 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 426 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,198 major competitor apps |
| detected | 70 | 100 | 56 | 52 1,083 competing apps Median installs: 47,914 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,575 major competitor apps |
| apps | 69 | 100 | 81 | 77 31,191 competing apps Median installs: 49,219 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 4,578 major competitor apps |
| algorithm | 71 | 100 | 42 | 59 2,959 competing apps Median installs: 39,979 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 323 major competitor apps |
| emotions | 71 | 100 | 42 | 61 3,864 competing apps Median installs: 37,926 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 405 major competitor apps |
App Description
Be aware of your body sensations and emotions in novel ways
With EmoPaint, you can:
• Represent your bodily sensations in a novel way, by painting them interactively on the screen, in a free mode or following a Mindfulness exercise (body scan).
• Have your emotions detected through an analysis of your painting. The analysis starts with the Bodily Maps of Emotions proposed by Nummenmaa et al. (see reference below), but we have also added a machine learning algorithm that gives you the option to teach the app to recognize your personal patterns of sensations.
• Create a diary of your emotions. The app can automatically update the diary each time you paint your sensations. [THIS FEATURE BECOMES ACTIVE AFTER 4 WEEKS OF USE]
• See different infographics about your emotions over time. [THIS FEATURE BECOMES ACTIVE AFTER 4 WEEKS OF USE]
Scientific Reference:
L. Nummenmaa, E. Glerean, R. Hari, and J. K. Hietanen (2014). “Bodily maps of emotions”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, PNAS 111(2), 646-651
