AcceleratorKMS 5.0
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 73 keywords for AcceleratorKMS 5.0 in Google Play
AcceleratorKMS 5.0 tracks 73 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 73 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 44.3.
AcceleratorKMS' Mobile Offline Execution Application
Tracked keywords
73
0 ranked • 73 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: connectivity
Avg difficulty
44.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 60.9
connectivity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 275
- 60.9
completion
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 162
- 63.6
combined
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 562
- 63.5
package
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 552
- 63.0
facilitates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 148
Unranked opportunities
connectivity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 275
completion
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 162
combined
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 562
package
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 552
facilitates
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 148
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 391,175 • Major competitors: 18,119
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
make
Total apps: 330,494 • Major competitors: 20,501
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
experience
Total apps: 282,658 • Major competitors: 16,683
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
mobile
Total apps: 280,245 • Major competitors: 11,030
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
start
Total apps: 195,082 • Major competitors: 12,746
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 108,922 competing apps Median installs: 4,298 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,938 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 193,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,519 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 10,143 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 330,494 competing apps Median installs: 2,474 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 20,501 major competitor apps |
| connected | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 72,687 competing apps Median installs: 625 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| tailored | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 47,922 competing apps Median installs: 612 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,681 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 57 | 87 282,658 competing apps Median installs: 1,757 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 16,683 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 121,785 competing apps Median installs: 871 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,516 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 109,334 competing apps Median installs: 567 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,579 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 128,388 competing apps Median installs: 2,336 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,045 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,193 competing apps Median installs: 716 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,435 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 391,175 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,119 major competitor apps |
| connectivity | 74 | 100 | 42 | 61 6,642 competing apps Median installs: 1,534 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 275 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,245 competing apps Median installs: 1,393 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,030 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 114,755 competing apps Median installs: 826 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,481 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 58 | 82 129,628 competing apps Median installs: 3,393 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,838 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 195,082 competing apps Median installs: 2,669 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 12,746 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 89,591 competing apps Median installs: 3,477 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 6,382 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 180,016 competing apps Median installs: 913 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,121 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 166,917 competing apps Median installs: 5,298 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 11,862 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 167,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,649 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 142,295 competing apps Median installs: 2,027 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,037 major competitor apps |
| knowledge | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 58,694 competing apps Median installs: 1,243 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,358 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,336 competing apps Median installs: 872 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 609 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 53,664 competing apps Median installs: 3,340 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,726 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 140,240 competing apps Median installs: 1,997 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,548 major competitor apps |
App Description
AcceleratorKMS' Mobile Offline Execution Application
The digital system includes “Procedure Lifecycle Management (PLCM),” a "Connected Worker Platform (CWP)," a "Learner Experience Platform (LXP)," a “Component Content Management System (CCMS),” and a “Quality Management System (QMS).”
The combined capability facilitates solutions to many critical problems experienced in workplaces across America and around the World. The system provides an integrated digital content ecosystem in an easy-to-use and intuitive package focused on making the complex simple.
AcceleratorKMS' Mobile Offline Execution Application is specifically tailored to allow the offline completion of procedures in low or no connectivity environments. The user can search and view procedures, start and resume completions, make completion comments, view completions, and sync with AcceleratorKMS when back online. The limitations are inherent in offline environments such as no collaborative execution and real-time tracking.
*Use of the online application is recommended in all scenarios that connectivity is available. *
