AcceleratorKMS 5.0
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 73 keywords for AcceleratorKMS 5.0 in Google Play
AcceleratorKMS 5.0 tracks 73 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 73 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.1, difficulty 47.7.
AcceleratorKMS' Mobile Offline Execution Application
Tracked keywords
73
0 ranked • 73 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.1
Top keyword: specifically
Avg difficulty
47.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.6
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 651
- 68.3
solutions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 727
- 70.1
low
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 53.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,593
- 66.5
focused
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 671
- 69.8
complex
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,186
Unranked opportunities
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 651
solutions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Competitors: 727
low
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 53.0 • Competitors: 1,593
focused
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 671
complex
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 1,186
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 68 | 100 | 60 | 81 54,787 competing apps Median installs: 36,532 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,486 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 22,704 competing apps Median installs: 25,700 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,181 major competitor apps |
| tailored | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 15,571 competing apps Median installs: 27,345 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,393 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 64 | 81 56,908 competing apps Median installs: 30,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,627 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 64 | 71 15,037 competing apps Median installs: 30,161 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,552 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| connectivity | 71 | 100 | 47 | 59 2,723 competing apps Median installs: 27,936 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 69 | 100 | 56 | 79 39,579 competing apps Median installs: 28,449 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,140 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 67 | 82 64,261 competing apps Median installs: 33,401 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,565 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 88,254 competing apps Median installs: 44,186 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 11,840 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 68 | 80 47,754 competing apps Median installs: 40,524 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,815 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 63,400 competing apps Median installs: 25,686 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,690 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,617 major competitor apps |
| knowledge | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 23,013 competing apps Median installs: 22,252 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,315 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 73 | 100 | 46 | 69 10,294 competing apps Median installs: 22,066 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 651 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 62 | 76 28,322 competing apps Median installs: 45,422 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,042 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,926 major competitor apps |
App Description
AcceleratorKMS' Mobile Offline Execution Application
The digital system includes “Procedure Lifecycle Management (PLCM),” a "Connected Worker Platform (CWP)," a "Learner Experience Platform (LXP)," a “Component Content Management System (CCMS),” and a “Quality Management System (QMS).”
The combined capability facilitates solutions to many critical problems experienced in workplaces across America and around the World. The system provides an integrated digital content ecosystem in an easy-to-use and intuitive package focused on making the complex simple.
AcceleratorKMS' Mobile Offline Execution Application is specifically tailored to allow the offline completion of procedures in low or no connectivity environments. The user can search and view procedures, start and resume completions, make completion comments, view completions, and sync with AcceleratorKMS when back online. The limitations are inherent in offline environments such as no collaborative execution and real-time tracking.
*Use of the online application is recommended in all scenarios that connectivity is available. *
