Father of microscope
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 65 keywords for Father of microscope in Google Play
Father of microscope tracks 65 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 65 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 45.3.
Transforms traditional microscope slides into a digital experience at your fingertips.
Tracked keywords
65
0 ranked • 65 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: analytics
Avg difficulty
45.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.5
analytics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 215
- 62.4
colored
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 534
- 63.5
greatest
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 727
- 62.6
essence
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 266
- 64.2
scientific
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 313
Unranked opportunities
analytics
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 215
colored
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 534
greatest
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 727
essence
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 266
scientific
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 313
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 410,996 • Major competitors: 20,188
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
experience
Total apps: 276,459 • Major competitors: 16,246
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
without
Total apps: 227,537 • Major competitors: 13,120
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
allows
Total apps: 185,582 • Major competitors: 7,297
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
personal
Total apps: 148,876 • Major competitors: 6,863
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experience | 65 | 100 | 57 | 87 276,459 competing apps Median installs: 1,765 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 16,246 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 109,416 competing apps Median installs: 1,575 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,768 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 118,875 competing apps Median installs: 881 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,377 major competitor apps |
| interest | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 26,940 competing apps Median installs: 2,509 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,510 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 54,273 competing apps Median installs: 3,490 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,170 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 90 410,996 competing apps Median installs: 1,475 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 20,188 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 33,920 competing apps Median installs: 1,529 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,464 major competitor apps |
| offer | 69 | 100 | 51 | 79 85,810 competing apps Median installs: 1,282 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,704 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 144,048 competing apps Median installs: 1,704 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,649 major competitor apps |
| touch | 69 | 100 | 52 | 76 61,782 competing apps Median installs: 1,915 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,685 major competitor apps |
| explore | 68 | 100 | 57 | 81 123,164 competing apps Median installs: 1,880 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,587 major competitor apps |
| driven | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,298 competing apps Median installs: 686 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 512 major competitor apps |
| helping | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 39,019 competing apps Median installs: 1,030 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,458 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 73,680 competing apps Median installs: 1,449 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,067 major competitor apps |
| analytics | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 9,523 competing apps Median installs: 402 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| researcher | 69 | 100 | 39 | 42 409 competing apps Median installs: 2,443 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| practical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,143 competing apps Median installs: 920 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 105,794 competing apps Median installs: 1,974 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,500 major competitor apps |
| colored | 74 | 100 | 41 | 62 8,182 competing apps Median installs: 3,052 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 534 major competitor apps |
| personal | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 148,876 competing apps Median installs: 1,411 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,863 major competitor apps |
| allows | 66 | 100 | 54 | 84 185,582 competing apps Median installs: 1,477 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,297 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 227,537 competing apps Median installs: 3,623 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 13,120 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 133,193 competing apps Median installs: 2,043 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,118 major competitor apps |
| instructors | 73 | 100 | 34 | 56 3,107 competing apps Median installs: 534 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| learner | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,150 competing apps Median installs: 1,702 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 67 major competitor apps |
App Description
Transforms traditional microscope slides into a digital experience at your fingertips.
The essence of the idea:
Glass slide digitization
Each microscopic specimen is scanned at high resolution and stored as an interactive image cloud that can be zoomed or moved with the touch of a finger, as if you were rotating the lens yourself.
Laboratory tools simulation
Virtual zoom wheel, controllable lighting, and direct measurement of dimensions within the specimen—all without lenses, oils, or slide cleaning.
Focusing on interaction
The user writes their notes over the image, places colored markers on areas of interest, and shares them instantly with colleagues or their scientific supervisor.
Data-driven self-learning
Every zoom movement or viewing time is recorded (anonymously) to provide analytics on the points of greatest interest to learners, helping instructors improve their practical content.