Pixilang

Developer: Alexander Zolotov

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

14.4K installs

202 ratings

73 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +9.00

Steady

Monthly +42

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 52 keywords for Pixilang in Google Play

Developer: Alexander Zolotov Category: tools Rating: 3.22

Pixilang tracks 52 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 52 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 45.6.

Pixel-oriented programming language for multimedia apps and experiments

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 52 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: multimedia

Avg difficulty

45.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

multimedia

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 221
59.2
universal

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 469
60.8
formats

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 886
62.7
external

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 927
67.3
stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 939
68.7

Unranked opportunities

multimedia

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 221
universal

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 469
formats

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 886
external

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 927
stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 939

High competition keywords

data

Total apps: 182,594 • Major competitors: 7,201

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
favorite

Total apps: 171,468 • Major competitors: 11,007

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
platform

Total apps: 125,856 • Major competitors: 2,999

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
open

Total apps: 96,952 • Major competitors: 7,347

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.3
text

Total apps: 77,939 • Major competitors: 4,676

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
source	72	100	47	70 25,945 competing apps Median installs: 2,274 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,015 major competitor apps
external	73	100	47	67 16,869 competing apps Median installs: 1,501 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	927 major competitor apps
language	69	100	53	76 62,345 competing apps Median installs: 3,019 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,693 major competitor apps
created	70	100	48	76 55,678 competing apps Median installs: 1,995 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,182 major competitor apps
file	72	100	57	71 29,184 competing apps Median installs: 6,147 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,444 major competitor apps
dynamic	70	100	49	74 45,591 competing apps Median installs: 1,846 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,716 major competitor apps
small	70	100	49	76 57,932 competing apps Median installs: 2,160 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,940 major competitor apps
code	70	100	49	74 44,444 competing apps Median installs: 1,921 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,214 major competitor apps
favorite	67	100	60	83 171,468 competing apps Median installs: 2,974 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	11,007 major competitor apps
text	69	100	57	78 77,939 competing apps Median installs: 4,528 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	4,676 major competitor apps
open	68	100	54	79 96,952 competing apps Median installs: 4,244 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,347 major competitor apps
type	70	100	52	75 49,652 competing apps Median installs: 3,942 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,860 major competitor apps
block	72	100	51	69 21,170 competing apps Median installs: 5,810 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,078 major competitor apps
files	72	100	60	71 28,231 competing apps Median installs: 7,378 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,699 major competitor apps
functions	71	100	47	72 31,292 competing apps Median installs: 3,039 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,457 major competitor apps
sound	69	100	51	76 61,974 competing apps Median installs: 6,402 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,752 major competitor apps
data	66	100	57	84 182,594 competing apps Median installs: 1,338 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,201 major competitor apps
text files	70	100	29	42 450 competing apps Median installs: 4,153 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	31 major competitor apps
apps	69	100	64	76 62,434 competing apps Median installs: 4,720 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,016 major competitor apps
platform	68	100	51	81 125,856 competing apps Median installs: 691 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,999 major competitor apps
multimedia	74	100	38	59 5,217 competing apps Median installs: 1,418 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	221 major competitor apps
stored	73	100	49	69 20,521 competing apps Median installs: 1,586 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	939 major competitor apps
universal	74	100	42	61 6,635 competing apps Median installs: 4,042 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	469 major competitor apps
point	71	100	47	72 35,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,899 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,703 major competitor apps
supported	71	100	52	71 30,235 competing apps Median installs: 3,781 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,755 major competitor apps

App Description

Pixel-oriented programming language for multimedia apps and experiments

Pixilang is a pixel-oriented programming language for small graphics/sound applications and experiments. Originally created by Alexander Zolotov (NightRadio) and Mik Razuvaev (Goglus) for non-programmers and artists. It is cross-platform and open source (MIT).

Pixilang programs are stored in text files (UTF-8 encoding) with extensions .txt or .pixi. So you can use your favorite text editor to create/edit these files. Pixilang has no built-in editor.

Key features:
• universal containers (pixi-container) for any type of data;
• dynamically typed variables (for integer or floating point numbers);
• functions for sound synthesis and recording;
• functions for block data processing;
• supported file formats (load/save): WAV, PNG, JPG, GIF (animated);
• native code (external dynamic libraries) support;
• OpenGL acceleration;
• MIDI In/Out.

Documentation: https://warmplace.ru/soft/pixilang/manual.php