AnticoagEvaluator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 30 keywords for AnticoagEvaluator in Google Play
AnticoagEvaluator tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 39.9.
Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.
Tracked keywords
30
0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: patients
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.5
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
- 59.4
tuned
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
- 62.1
clinical
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 78
- 60.3
viewed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 251
Unranked opportunities
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 195
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 202
tuned
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 348
clinical
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 78
viewed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 251
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 326,434 • Major competitors: 20,160
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
based
Total apps: 151,543 • Major competitors: 5,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
updated
Total apps: 81,984 • Major competitors: 3,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
informed
Total apps: 62,348 • Major competitors: 1,311
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.1
accurate
Total apps: 55,523 • Major competitors: 2,534
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 326,434 competing apps Median installs: 2,530 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 20,160 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,249 competing apps Median installs: 1,420 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,147 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,271 competing apps Median installs: 4,212 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,001 major competitor apps |
| driven | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,965 competing apps Median installs: 663 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 417 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,669 competing apps Median installs: 749 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,523 competing apps Median installs: 1,116 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,534 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,730 competing apps Median installs: 605 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| informed | 69 | 100 | 47 | 76 62,348 competing apps Median installs: 454 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,311 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 151,543 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,852 major competitor apps |
| tuned | 74 | 100 | 39 | 59 5,412 competing apps Median installs: 2,818 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| developed | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 51,484 competing apps Median installs: 1,359 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,366 major competitor apps |
| updated | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 81,984 competing apps Median installs: 1,453 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,191 major competitor apps |
| options | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 53,660 competing apps Median installs: 2,464 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,252 major competitor apps |
| risk | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 15,491 competing apps Median installs: 1,752 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 707 major competitor apps |
| anti | 72 | 100 | 38 | 52 1,763 competing apps Median installs: 15,882 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 239 major competitor apps |
| stroke | 72 | 100 | 37 | 54 2,639 competing apps Median installs: 2,440 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| guidance | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,660 competing apps Median installs: 1,058 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 660 major competitor apps |
| individualized | 71 | 100 | 29 | 47 926 competing apps Median installs: 390 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| adjusted | 72 | 100 | 37 | 55 2,723 competing apps Median installs: 2,153 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 117 major competitor apps |
| prescribing | 69 | 100 | 25 | 41 375 competing apps Median installs: 1,938 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| clinical | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,924 competing apps Median installs: 822 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| viewed | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 6,172 competing apps Median installs: 3,238 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| decisions | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 18,596 competing apps Median installs: 895 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 598 major competitor apps |
| therapy | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 5,121 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| informed decisions | 74 | 100 | 36 | 60 5,822 competing apps Median installs: 429 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
App Description
Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.
Use the app to:
• Calculate a patient's renal function and risk of ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, and bleed
• Review ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline-driven therapy guidance for stroke prevention
• Generate individualized risk for anti thrombotic therapy options based on individual clinical trials.
• Improve accurate use of DOACs with adjusted dosage based on prescribing information, fine-tuned for renal and other patient characteristics.
This app is based on SPARC Tool, developed by Peter Loewen, ACPR, Pharm.D., FCSHP, which can be viewed at www.sparctool.com