AnticoagEvaluator

Developer: American College of

Category: Medical

29.1K installs

67 ratings

+23 weekly installs

+79 monthly installs

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 30 keywords for AnticoagEvaluator in Google Play

Developer: American College of Cardiology Foundation Category: medical Rating: 4.86

AnticoagEvaluator tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 41.8.

Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.5

Top keyword: driven

Avg difficulty

41.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

driven

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 491
63.7
risk

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 619
64.7
guidance

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 600
66.6
decisions

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 660
65.8
individual

Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,085
71.4

Unranked opportunities

driven

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 491
risk

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 619
guidance

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 600
decisions

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 660
individual

Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Competitors: 1,085

High competition keywords

make

Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
based

Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
updated

Total apps: 32,012 • Major competitors: 2,956

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
options

Total apps: 26,770 • Major competitors: 3,668

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
developed

Total apps: 21,997 • Major competitors: 1,467

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
make	64	100	65	89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	21,922 major competitor apps
individual	71	100	54	71 15,144 competing apps Median installs: 20,930 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,085 major competitor apps
function	71	100	51	73 19,612 competing apps Median installs: 35,316 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,942 major competitor apps
driven	72	100	44	64 5,330 competing apps Median installs: 23,790 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	491 major competitor apps
patients	71	100	39	60 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 19,052 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	203 major competitor apps
accurate	71	100	50	73 19,904 competing apps Median installs: 36,597 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,266 major competitor apps
patient	71	100	38	61 3,718 competing apps Median installs: 18,204 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	190 major competitor apps
informed	71	100	48	72 16,326 competing apps Median installs: 20,770 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,194 major competitor apps
based	67	100	63	82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,592 major competitor apps
tuned	71	100	43	59 2,793 competing apps Median installs: 45,112 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	373 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	48	74 21,997 competing apps Median installs: 22,751 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,467 major competitor apps
updated	69	100	54	77 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 28,552 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,956 major competitor apps
options	70	100	56	76 26,770 competing apps Median installs: 42,964 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	3,668 major competitor apps
risk	72	100	45	65 6,149 competing apps Median installs: 28,500 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	619 major competitor apps
anti	64	100	40	50 830 competing apps Median installs: 115,142 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	170 major competitor apps
stroke	70	100	40	53 1,191 competing apps Median installs: 42,000 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	148 major competitor apps
guidance	72	100	43	67 7,888 competing apps Median installs: 24,858 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	600 major competitor apps
individualized	68	100	27	42 276 competing apps Median installs: 18,012 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	13 major competitor apps
adjusted	70	100	40	54 1,362 competing apps Median installs: 31,666 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	146 major competitor apps
prescribing	67	100	24	38 175 competing apps Median installs: 12,455 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2 major competitor apps
clinical	71	100	36	58 2,562 competing apps Median installs: 15,804 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	74 major competitor apps
viewed	71	100	42	60 3,279 competing apps Median installs: 31,098 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	287 major competitor apps
decisions	72	100	43	66 7,117 competing apps Median installs: 26,885 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	660 major competitor apps
therapy	70	100	36	56 1,841 competing apps Median installs: 21,646 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	99 major competitor apps
informed decisions	70	100	35	55 1,768 competing apps Median installs: 18,605 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	111 major competitor apps

App Description

Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.

Make well-informed decisions on anti thrombotic therapy for your non-valvular AF patients with the updated AnticoagEvaluator.
Use the app to:
• Calculate a patient's renal function and risk of ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, and bleed
• Review ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline-driven therapy guidance for stroke prevention
• Generate individualized risk for anti thrombotic therapy options based on individual clinical trials.
• Improve accurate use of DOACs with adjusted dosage based on prescribing information, fine-tuned for renal and other patient characteristics.
This app is based on SPARC Tool, developed by Peter Loewen, ACPR, Pharm.D., FCSHP, which can be viewed at www.sparctool.com