AnticoagEvaluator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 30 keywords for AnticoagEvaluator in Google Play
AnticoagEvaluator tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 39.9.
Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.
Tracked keywords
30
0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: patients
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 198
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 200
- 59.6
tuned
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 357
- 62.0
clinical
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 75
- 60.5
viewed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 255
Unranked opportunities
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 198
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 200
tuned
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 357
clinical
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 75
viewed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Competitors: 255
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 330,494 • Major competitors: 20,505
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
based
Total apps: 154,090 • Major competitors: 5,984
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
updated
Total apps: 83,050 • Major competitors: 3,164
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2
informed
Total apps: 63,604 • Major competitors: 1,282
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.2
options
Total apps: 54,437 • Major competitors: 3,336
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 330,494 competing apps Median installs: 2,474 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 20,505 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,689 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,933 competing apps Median installs: 4,216 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,982 major competitor apps |
| driven | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 15,253 competing apps Median installs: 636 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 428 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 64 9,763 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,944 competing apps Median installs: 1,429 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,486 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,564 competing apps Median installs: 599 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 200 major competitor apps |
| informed | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 63,604 competing apps Median installs: 384 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,282 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 154,090 competing apps Median installs: 1,414 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,984 major competitor apps |
| tuned | 74 | 100 | 39 | 60 5,498 competing apps Median installs: 2,793 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 357 major competitor apps |
| developed | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 52,003 competing apps Median installs: 1,330 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,387 major competitor apps |
| updated | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 83,050 competing apps Median installs: 1,250 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,164 major competitor apps |
| options | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 54,437 competing apps Median installs: 2,410 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,336 major competitor apps |
| risk | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 14,988 competing apps Median installs: 1,749 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 696 major competitor apps |
| anti | 72 | 100 | 38 | 51 1,567 competing apps Median installs: 20,497 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 222 major competitor apps |
| stroke | 72 | 100 | 37 | 54 2,597 competing apps Median installs: 2,450 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| guidance | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,008 competing apps Median installs: 1,038 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 635 major competitor apps |
| individualized | 71 | 100 | 29 | 47 919 competing apps Median installs: 386 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| adjusted | 72 | 100 | 37 | 55 2,755 competing apps Median installs: 2,094 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| prescribing | 69 | 100 | 25 | 41 377 competing apps Median installs: 1,825 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| clinical | 74 | 100 | 37 | 62 7,744 competing apps Median installs: 816 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| viewed | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 6,237 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| decisions | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 18,908 competing apps Median installs: 856 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 603 major competitor apps |
| therapy | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 5,036 competing apps Median installs: 928 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| informed decisions | 74 | 100 | 36 | 60 5,904 competing apps Median installs: 414 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
App Description
Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.
Use the app to:
• Calculate a patient's renal function and risk of ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, and bleed
• Review ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline-driven therapy guidance for stroke prevention
• Generate individualized risk for anti thrombotic therapy options based on individual clinical trials.
• Improve accurate use of DOACs with adjusted dosage based on prescribing information, fine-tuned for renal and other patient characteristics.
This app is based on SPARC Tool, developed by Peter Loewen, ACPR, Pharm.D., FCSHP, which can be viewed at www.sparctool.com