AnticoagEvaluator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 30 keywords for AnticoagEvaluator in Google Play
AnticoagEvaluator tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 39.9.
Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.
Tracked keywords
30
0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: patients
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.5
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
- 59.4
tuned
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 349
- 62.1
clinical
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 78
- 60.4
viewed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 253
Unranked opportunities
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 195
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 202
tuned
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.8 • Competitors: 349
clinical
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 78
viewed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 253
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 326,506 • Major competitors: 20,179
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
based
Total apps: 151,581 • Major competitors: 5,856
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
updated
Total apps: 81,976 • Major competitors: 3,188
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.1
informed
Total apps: 62,343 • Major competitors: 1,311
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.1
accurate
Total apps: 55,521 • Major competitors: 2,533
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 326,506 competing apps Median installs: 2,532 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 20,179 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,249 competing apps Median installs: 1,420 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,149 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,268 competing apps Median installs: 4,210 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,999 major competitor apps |
| driven | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,968 competing apps Median installs: 663 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 418 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,669 competing apps Median installs: 749 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,521 competing apps Median installs: 1,116 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,533 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,729 competing apps Median installs: 605 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| informed | 69 | 100 | 47 | 76 62,343 competing apps Median installs: 454 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,311 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 151,581 competing apps Median installs: 1,470 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,856 major competitor apps |
| tuned | 74 | 100 | 39 | 59 5,416 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 349 major competitor apps |
| developed | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 51,494 competing apps Median installs: 1,360 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,367 major competitor apps |
| updated | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 81,976 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,188 major competitor apps |
| options | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 53,676 competing apps Median installs: 2,468 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,255 major competitor apps |
| risk | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 15,492 competing apps Median installs: 1,753 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 707 major competitor apps |
| anti | 72 | 100 | 38 | 52 1,760 competing apps Median installs: 15,857 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 238 major competitor apps |
| stroke | 72 | 100 | 37 | 54 2,638 competing apps Median installs: 2,438 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| guidance | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,655 competing apps Median installs: 1,058 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 659 major competitor apps |
| individualized | 71 | 100 | 29 | 47 926 competing apps Median installs: 390 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| adjusted | 72 | 100 | 37 | 55 2,725 competing apps Median installs: 2,159 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| prescribing | 69 | 100 | 25 | 41 375 competing apps Median installs: 1,938 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| clinical | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,924 competing apps Median installs: 822 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| viewed | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 6,174 competing apps Median installs: 3,242 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 253 major competitor apps |
| decisions | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 18,603 competing apps Median installs: 896 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 599 major competitor apps |
| therapy | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 5,121 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 103 major competitor apps |
| informed decisions | 74 | 100 | 36 | 60 5,824 competing apps Median installs: 430 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
App Description
Make informed anti thrombotic therapy decisions for AF patients.
Use the app to:
• Calculate a patient's renal function and risk of ischemic stroke, thromboembolism, and bleed
• Review ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline-driven therapy guidance for stroke prevention
• Generate individualized risk for anti thrombotic therapy options based on individual clinical trials.
• Improve accurate use of DOACs with adjusted dosage based on prescribing information, fine-tuned for renal and other patient characteristics.
This app is based on SPARC Tool, developed by Peter Loewen, ACPR, Pharm.D., FCSHP, which can be viewed at www.sparctool.com