ESC CVD Risk Calculation
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for ESC CVD Risk Calculation in Google Play
ESC CVD Risk Calculation tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 41.7.
Individual cardiovascular risk assessment for healthcare professionals
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
41.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.3
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 284
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 173
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 200
- 65.1
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 375
- 61.1
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 284
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 173
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 200
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 375
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 123
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 264,190 • Major competitors: 8,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
features
Total apps: 250,100 • Major competitors: 14,990
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.1
available
Total apps: 194,534 • Major competitors: 10,380
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
online
Total apps: 193,969 • Major competitors: 10,143
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
data
Total apps: 177,045 • Major competitors: 7,061
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 193,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,519 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 10,143 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 74 | 100 | 45 | 64 10,874 competing apps Median installs: 585 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 284 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 25,404 competing apps Median installs: 2,270 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,004 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 164,701 competing apps Median installs: 1,612 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,885 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 103,943 competing apps Median installs: 1,509 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,170 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,257 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 882 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 264,190 competing apps Median installs: 798 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,559 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 59,659 competing apps Median installs: 1,095 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,132 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 62,678 competing apps Median installs: 2,675 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,195 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 194,534 competing apps Median installs: 2,770 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 10,380 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 137,954 competing apps Median installs: 1,610 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,040 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,006 competing apps Median installs: 1,714 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 173 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 140,933 competing apps Median installs: 3,233 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 8,814 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 15,924 competing apps Median installs: 702 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 325 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 167,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,649 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,560 competing apps Median installs: 599 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 200 major competitor apps |
| powered | 71 | 100 | 61 | 72 32,124 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,224 major competitor apps |
| center | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 27,454 competing apps Median installs: 1,386 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,177 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 17,158 competing apps Median installs: 3,015 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 660 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,761 competing apps Median installs: 444 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 411 major competitor apps |
| internet | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,271 competing apps Median installs: 4,125 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,931 major competitor apps |
| influence | 73 | 100 | 37 | 59 5,055 competing apps Median installs: 3,228 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,186 competing apps Median installs: 2,058 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 375 major competitor apps |
| includes | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 67,101 competing apps Median installs: 2,497 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,842 major competitor apps |
App Description
Individual cardiovascular risk assessment for healthcare professionals
SCORE2
SCORE2-OP
SCORE2-Diabetes
ASCVD
SMART
SMART-REACH*
DIAL*
LIFE-CVD*
* Available online on U-Prevent (Internet connection required)
The ESC CVD Risk Calculation App is available in English. It provides guidance to the most adapted calculator for your patient, and provides an estimation of cardiovascular risk. Of note, patient data are not stored in the App.
This application is only for informative use and is not intended to provide therapeutic support or diagnosis assistance.
This Application is powered by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), based upon the source codes of the U-Prevent webtool, a concept developed by University Medical Center Utrecht, redesigned and owned by ORTEC.
The SCORE2, SCORE2-OP and SCORE2-Diabetes calculators were developed in collaboration with the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration unit.
The Application has recently been updated in the framework of the EAPC IMPLEMENT Programme (2023) which was supported by Novo Nordisk in the form of an educational grant. The sponsor did not have any involvement or influence on the features nor on the scientific contents within the Application.