ESC CVD Risk Calculation
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for ESC CVD Risk Calculation in Google Play
ESC CVD Risk Calculation tracks 76 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 75 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.2, difficulty 42.3, best rank 7.
Individual cardiovascular risk assessment for healthcare professionals
Tracked keywords
76
1 ranked • 75 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 7 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
42.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.4
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 281
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 195
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 118
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 281
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 195
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 348
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 118
High competition keywords
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
features
Total apps: 253,887 • Major competitors: 13,784
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
available
Total apps: 199,899 • Major competitors: 9,729
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
online
Total apps: 196,125 • Major competitors: 9,435
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.9
data
Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cardiovascular | 71 | 100 | 31 | 49 1,207 competing apps Median installs: 1,617 Avg rating: 1.9 | 11 | 7 | 35 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 196,125 competing apps Median installs: 1,362 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 9,435 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 74 | 100 | 45 | 64 11,030 competing apps Median installs: 508 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 25,796 competing apps Median installs: 1,836 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 939 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,327 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,681 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,239 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,909 competing apps Median installs: 1,039 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 60,759 competing apps Median installs: 981 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,027 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 63,825 competing apps Median installs: 2,077 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,975 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,899 competing apps Median installs: 2,015 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 136,849 competing apps Median installs: 1,367 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,403 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,157 competing apps Median installs: 1,522 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 139,841 competing apps Median installs: 2,620 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,811 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,262 competing apps Median installs: 658 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 165,742 competing apps Median installs: 1,224 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,954 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,704 competing apps Median installs: 528 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 195 major competitor apps |
| powered | 71 | 100 | 64 | 72 31,475 competing apps Median installs: 980 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,098 major competitor apps |
| center | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 27,756 competing apps Median installs: 1,174 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,100 major competitor apps |
| upon | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,996 competing apps Median installs: 2,384 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 590 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,406 competing apps Median installs: 431 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 375 major competitor apps |
| internet | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 122,226 competing apps Median installs: 3,191 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,541 major competitor apps |
| influence | 73 | 100 | 37 | 59 5,129 competing apps Median installs: 2,777 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,523 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
App Description
Individual cardiovascular risk assessment for healthcare professionals
SCORE2
SCORE2-OP
SCORE2-Diabetes
ASCVD
SMART
SMART-REACH*
DIAL*
LIFE-CVD*
* Available online on U-Prevent (Internet connection required)
The ESC CVD Risk Calculation App is available in English. It provides guidance to the most adapted calculator for your patient, and provides an estimation of cardiovascular risk. Of note, patient data are not stored in the App.
This application is only for informative use and is not intended to provide therapeutic support or diagnosis assistance.
This Application is powered by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), based upon the source codes of the U-Prevent webtool, a concept developed by University Medical Center Utrecht, redesigned and owned by ORTEC.
The SCORE2, SCORE2-OP and SCORE2-Diabetes calculators were developed in collaboration with the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration unit.
The Application has recently been updated in the framework of the EAPC IMPLEMENT Programme (2023) which was supported by Novo Nordisk in the form of an educational grant. The sponsor did not have any involvement or influence on the features nor on the scientific contents within the Application.