Optima ELD
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 59 keywords for Optima ELD in Google Play
Optima ELD tracks 59 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 58 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 43.4, best rank 12.
Optima ELD electronic logbook
Tracked keywords
59
1 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 12 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: continuously
Avg difficulty
43.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.1
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 503
- 59.5
eliminating
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 200
- 63.8
strive
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 335
- 63.5
logging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 431
- 64.7
simplicity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 334
Unranked opportunities
continuously
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 503
eliminating
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Competitors: 200
strive
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 335
logging
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 431
simplicity
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 334
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
best
Total apps: 255,713 • Major competitors: 16,877
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
offers
Total apps: 195,234 • Major competitors: 7,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
keep
Total apps: 170,363 • Major competitors: 8,125
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| enriched | 72 | 100 | 35 | 53 2,140 competing apps Median installs: 2,384 Avg rating: 2.0 | 12 | 12 | 85 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 255,713 competing apps Median installs: 3,150 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,877 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 107,978 competing apps Median installs: 2,602 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,164 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,207 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,822 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,340 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,149 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,108 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,316 major competitor apps |
| service | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 134,155 competing apps Median installs: 1,199 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,360 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 136,849 competing apps Median installs: 1,367 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,403 major competitor apps |
| striving | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,232 competing apps Median installs: 631 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 64 major competitor apps |
| speed | 70 | 100 | 55 | 76 57,510 competing apps Median installs: 3,897 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,369 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 113,683 competing apps Median installs: 1,032 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,277 major competitor apps |
| vehicle | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 34,197 competing apps Median installs: 1,400 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,648 major competitor apps |
| fast | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 132,579 competing apps Median installs: 2,036 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,822 major competitor apps |
| informed | 69 | 100 | 47 | 76 62,101 competing apps Median installs: 418 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,193 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 65,936 competing apps Median installs: 861 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,827 major competitor apps |
| driver | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 26,058 competing apps Median installs: 1,306 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,575 major competitor apps |
| continuously | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,167 competing apps Median installs: 1,974 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| eliminating | 74 | 100 | 38 | 59 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 1,142 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 200 major competitor apps |
| functions | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 31,368 competing apps Median installs: 2,327 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,304 major competitor apps |
| strive | 74 | 100 | 40 | 64 10,145 competing apps Median installs: 906 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 335 major competitor apps |
| keep | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 170,363 competing apps Median installs: 1,390 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 8,125 major competitor apps |
| solution | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 78,710 competing apps Median installs: 762 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| understand | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,390 competing apps Median installs: 1,555 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,647 major competitor apps |
App Description
Optima ELD electronic logbook
USER-FRIENDLY
Our app is designed with drivers in mind, prioritizing their needs by creating the app with alerts, easy-to-use interface and large icons. Most functions can be accessed with just a few taps, ensuring simplicity and convenience. We understand that the ELD mandate can be complex, but we continuously strive to simplify FMCSA compliance for drivers.
OPTIMISED PERFORMANCE & DESIGN
We are dedicated to improving our app's speed and usability. By continuously improving our performance, we ensure our users have the best experience, while also striving to keep the app fast and stable.