Panini Ashtadhyayi | Sanskrit
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 48 keywords for Panini Ashtadhyayi | Sanskrit in Google Play
Panini Ashtadhyayi | Sanskrit tracks 48 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 48 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 41.3.
Panini Ashtadhyayi is one of the earliest grammars of Sanskrit.
Tracked keywords
48
0 ranked • 48 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: forms
Avg difficulty
41.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.5
forms
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 312
- 64.3
scientific
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 318
- 60.9
grammar
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 329
- 62.2
basis
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 257
- 63.2
texts
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 489
Unranked opportunities
forms
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 312
scientific
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 318
grammar
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 329
basis
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 257
texts
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 489
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 286,405 • Major competitors: 22,380
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.7
work
Total apps: 120,322 • Major competitors: 5,248
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
advanced
Total apps: 85,292 • Major competitors: 5,168
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
comprehensive
Total apps: 83,201 • Major competitors: 2,130
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.1
modern
Total apps: 75,604 • Major competitors: 3,489
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| modern | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 75,604 competing apps Median installs: 1,165 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,489 major competitor apps |
| mark | 73 | 100 | 43 | 69 20,251 competing apps Median installs: 1,705 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 853 major competitor apps |
| immediate | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,606 competing apps Median installs: 1,072 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 486 major competitor apps |
| introducing | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 23,600 competing apps Median installs: 690 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 763 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 83,201 competing apps Median installs: 733 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,130 major competitor apps |
| bring | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 66,406 competing apps Median installs: 2,459 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,306 major competitor apps |
| together | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 43,379 competing apps Median installs: 1,984 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,440 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 61 | 87 286,405 competing apps Median installs: 4,563 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 22,380 major competitor apps |
| advanced | 69 | 100 | 53 | 79 85,292 competing apps Median installs: 2,121 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 5,168 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 120,322 competing apps Median installs: 1,895 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,248 major competitor apps |
| whole | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 29,135 competing apps Median installs: 5,217 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,253 major competitor apps |
| forms | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 9,625 competing apps Median installs: 1,740 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 312 major competitor apps |
| period | 73 | 100 | 46 | 67 15,104 competing apps Median installs: 5,665 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 942 major competitor apps |
| th | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 15,681 competing apps Median installs: 3,371 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| providing | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 70,688 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,949 major competitor apps |
| classical | 73 | 100 | 39 | 59 5,167 competing apps Median installs: 4,298 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| developed | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 51,975 competing apps Median installs: 1,328 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,380 major competitor apps |
| scientific | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,785 competing apps Median installs: 1,504 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 318 major competitor apps |
| taken | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,140 competing apps Median installs: 2,736 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 607 major competitor apps |
| mid | 71 | 100 | 32 | 48 1,017 competing apps Median installs: 3,248 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| grammar | 74 | 100 | 40 | 61 6,577 competing apps Median installs: 6,107 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 329 major competitor apps |
| end | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 48,012 competing apps Median installs: 3,522 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,894 major competitor apps |
| thanks | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 33,077 competing apps Median installs: 2,014 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,550 major competitor apps |
| theory | 73 | 100 | 36 | 59 4,687 competing apps Median installs: 2,804 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| analysis | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,797 competing apps Median installs: 1,338 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 789 major competitor apps |
App Description
Panini Ashtadhyayi is one of the earliest grammars of Sanskrit.
Directed By:- Prof. Madan Mohan Jha
The Ashtadhyayi is one of the earliest known grammars of Sanskrit, although Pāṇini refers to previous texts like the Unadisutra, Dhatupatha, and Ganapatha. It is the earliest known work on linguistic description, and together with the work of his immediate predecessors (the Niruktas, Nighantus, and Pratishakyas) stands at the beginning of the history of linguistics itself. His theory of morphological analysis was more advanced than any equivalent Western theory before the mid 20th century, and his analysis of noun compounds still forms the basis of modern linguistic theories of compounding, which have borrowed Sanskrit terms such as bahuvrihi and dvandva.
Pāṇini's comprehensive and scientific theory of grammar is conventionally taken to mark the end of the period of Vedic Sanskrit, introducing the period of Classical Sanskrit.
The app bring the whole grammar to your mobile.
Special thanks to sanskritdocuments.org for providing the resources.